聽日翻2:00pm-10:00pm,哥哥等你呀🫶

Channel
💋💞純陀Bessie studio💘
@bessiestudio520
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
554subscribers
+412 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004363600486 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bessiestudio520 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 11 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bessiestudio520 |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 554 | +97 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 457 | +106 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 351 | +78 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:59 | 273 | +106 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 167 | +25 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 142 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3s
- Average length
- 1s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
45 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 35.6% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 15.6% | |
| 😘 | 6 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 11.1% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#usbreport Relax場TG: https://t.me/bessiestudio520 Relax場名:純陀Bessie studio 幫你Relax嘅女仔:Bessie 過程:P0 開門已經好靚好甜仲好白,同相一樣,cute爆,有漱口水滿哂分 P1 破冰揼骨好舒服,本身自己唔係成日玩呢啲體驗,心情好復雜,但吹水破冰令我無咁緊張。了解多咗,個人都鬆咗,扒低仲有白白長腿睇 P2 到戲肉除衫正題。雖然較暗咗,但太白啲皮膚,發光咁,睇得好清楚,雖然 奶唔大但好cute,Nuru都feel到粒點。挑逗又甜又有feel,起機起到好硬,打得都好舒服。 仲會不時轉pose 餵奶,又主動要人摸妹妹。 含得好甜無齒感。最尾打出好爽,成個人都舒服哂 總結好甜有女友feel,新做係寶藏 家用:1600 +300 情感滿分齊頭 2000,唔洗找 =================== #報告 #report #後補包膠 …
#好評
#好評
#好評
想見你 姑勿論晴天🌞 還是雨天☔️
《Relax 852 中獎報告》 #usbreport Relax場TG: https://t.me/bessiestudio520 Relax場名:純陀Bessie Studio 幫你Relax嘅女仔:Bessie 外貌:9.5/10 目測22左右,100%純陀,五觀有少少似少女版沈殷怡,笑嘅時候有啲腰果眼,氣質好迷人。 身材:9/10 約166cm,model身型,對腳好靚,皮膚白滑。除非係死忠胸奴族,否則一定會鍾意。 服務:9.5/10 過程: P0 開門相認,有啲驚豔,冇諗到個人工作室有咁後生高質嘅靚女,零彈鐘可能。入房自取其浴,Bessie先去準備,之後拎一次性毛巾幫我抹身。 P1 美容骨其實我唔好,但感覺到Bessie都有用心按,加上第一次見作為破冰都唔錯,所以冇skip. 佢非常健談,我哋由蜘蛛俠,MC嘅歌,SPA場嘅生態都有傾。😂 P2 揀咗60mins口爆plan,Bessie由錫耳,錫面,…
❤3👍1👏1💋1😘1
Hi I am Bessie 👧
❤4💋1🔥1🤗1🥰1😘1
#好評
❤1🔥1🥰1
聽日翻2:00pm-10:00pm,哥哥等你呀🫶
一次性漱口水已準備好🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️
😘3❤1👍1💋1🤩1🥰1
🎟️《Relax包租婆抽奬計劃》🎟️ 🔺鹹濕仔抽獎計劃強勢回歸🔺 ✅每月抽30位即平兩舊水✅ ———————————————— 🌟 #九龍 #純陀Bessiestudio TG:https://t.me/bessiestudio520 已參與$200優惠劵抽獎; ———————————————— ✅抽中即刻平兩舊水唔係同你講笑 ✅得獎師兄需預約時主動提供中獎記錄俾客服 ✅即可在預約時獲取200優惠 🆘抽獎疑問 @msrelaxhk852 ———《參加抽獎連結》——— ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/Relaxtgfun/14
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bessiestudio520. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💋💞純陀Bessie studio💘” (@bessiestudio520), 554 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bessiestudio520.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.