❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ The week in crypto: key market developments 🪭 J.P. Morgan Asset Management forecasts average annual Bitcoin returns of around 10% over the next 10 to 15 years. Alongside its baseline outlook for 2027, the firm's analysts outlined two alternative scenarios for the cryptocurrency. Under the bearish scenario, Bitcoin would decline by an average of 9.7% annually, while the bullish scenario projects average…

Channel
BestChange — exchanger directory
@bestchange
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,668subscribers
+14,689 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001246002508 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bestchange |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bestchange |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:59 | 23,668 | +8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 23,660 | +40 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 23,620 | +19 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:17 | 23,601 | -5 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:41 | 23,606 | -15 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:55 | 23,621 | -5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:20 | 23,626 | -11 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 23,637 | -6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:59 | 23,643 | -24 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 23,667 | -18 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 20:11 | 23,685 | -19 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 10:55 | 23,704 | -201 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 06:57 | 23,905 | -184 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:22 | 24,089 | -270 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 24,359 | -1,091 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:01 | 25,450 | -40 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 25,490 | -115 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 25,605 | -136 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 25,741 | -38 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 25,779 | first reading |
Engagement
79 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 85 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.58%
- avg views ÷ 23,668 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 373
- 30 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.07%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 30
- of 79 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 79 (27 July 2026 – 24 October 2026) |
| Views total | 11,185 |
| Reactions total | 454 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Oct 2026, 11:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 55s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,732 reactions across 78 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,516 | 40.6% | |
| 🔥 | 1,012 | 27.1% | |
| 👍 | 804 | 21.5% | |
| 👏 | 202 | 5.41% | |
| 🥰 | 41 | 1.10% | |
| ❤🔥 | 37 | 0.991% | |
| 😎 | 28 | 0.75% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 0.375% | |
| 🤩 | 13 | 0.348% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 0.295% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 0.268% | |
| ✍ | 9 | 0.241% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 0.161% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 0.134% | |
| 🥴 | 5 | 0.134% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.08% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.08% | |
| 🙉 | 3 | 0.08% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.054% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.054% | |
| 4 further kinds | 6 | 0.161% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,732 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 11
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 6
- of 79 we hold a reading for · 8%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bestchange. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 79 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 24 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🥰 BestChange September highlights In our latest update, we've rounded up the month's key achievements: 🪭 Key monitoring stats 🪭 Quality control and user support highlights 🪭 AML initiatives, fraud prevention efforts, and product updates The key takeaways are on the cards, and the best exchange rates, as always, at BestChange.biz AML analyzer | Mini App | X.com | New website
❤65🔥17😎11
On BestChange, reviews are part of a comprehensive quality control system. They help users make informed decisions and assess the reliability of an exchanger before completing a transaction. 👩💻 How reviews help you choose a service Before proceeding to an exchange service’s website, take a look at its profile page, including reviews, complaints, and the discussion history associated with them. The way a service re…
❤21👍5👎2🔥2
❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ Latest developments in the cryptocurrency industry 🖱️ Bitcoin could continue its recovery, although some analysts believe it is unlikely to surpass $100,000 before the end of the year. Rising interest rates and tensions surrounding Iran are weighing on the cryptocurrency market. Alice Liu, Head of Research at CoinMarketCap, noted that Bitcoin could finish the year above its current price but is unlikel…
❤14🔥2👎1
🔑 Restaking A crypto mechanism that lets users reuse cryptocurrency they have already staked to help secure additional blockchain networks or decentralized services—and potentially earn extra rewards. #cryptodictionary AML analyzer | Mini App | X.com | New website
❤10👍1👏1
❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ The week in digital assets: key developments ➡️ Tether unveiled QVAC TranscribePsy this week, a multilingual AI model designed for automatic speech recognition. The model can transcribe 10 minutes of audio in just 1.6 seconds on a recent iPhone. According to the company’s press release, TranscribePsy has 254 million parameters and processes audio locally, without sending recordings to cloud platforms, …
❤6👍3🥰1
🥰 How a batch transfer can link a user to high-risk sources of funds One of our users received crypto from an exchange service listed on BestChange. Some time later, they checked the address used to receive the funds with an AML Analyzer and discovered a link to a high-risk source—despite never having interacted with it directly. 🪭 We reviewed the transaction history, identified the cause, and helped the parties re…
❤9🔥4
🥰 Reviews and complaints in the BestChange Telegram Mini App and mobile app Our mobile products keep receiving new features—or, more precisely, familiar ones that our website visitors have long known and used. You can now visit an exchange service’s profile in the BestChange Telegram Mini App and mobile app to: 🪭 leave a review about a completed exchange: rate your experience, give feedback, and attach screenshots…
❤12🔥4
🥰 Not sure what to exchange or where to get the best rate? Start with the popular choices! BestChange lists more than 54,000 currency pairs. But if you simply want to exchange USDT for cash USD or buy BTC, such a wide selection can make it harder to find the right pair. That’s why BestChange websites feature a Popular section, bringing together the currency pairs users exchange most often. Where to find the Popular…
👍8👏2🔥1
❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ Key developments in the digital asset industry as the week begins 👩💻 The U.S. Department of Justice is reviewing whether cryptocurrency exchange Binance has complied with the terms of the 2023 settlement. The agreement followed findings of banking compliance violations and required the company to pay $4.3 billion in penalties. The latest scrutiny concerns potential violations of U.S. sanctions against…
❤6👍4
🕹️ Flash loan A collateral-free loan in DeFi protocols that is issued and repaid within a single blockchain transaction. If the borrower fails to return the funds plus fees before the transaction completes, the entire operation is automatically reverted as if it never happened. This eliminates the risk of non-repayment for the protocol: the money is either returned within the same transaction or the operation does n…
❤9
❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ What’s been driving discussions in the crypto market lately 👩💻 Capital inflows into the cryptocurrency industry have reached approximately $50 billion since the beginning of 2026, according to JPMorgan. Most of the investment has flowed into spot crypto ETFs and futures. Market indicators tracked by the bank’s analysts also suggest that traders have begun rebuilding long positions in Bitcoin and Ether…
👍9❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @bestchange. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What would help you start promoting AML checks through your referral link?
- 🖱️ A ready-to-post article or social media post28%
- 🖱️ Banners tailored to my platform17%
- 🖱️ A simple explanation of why AML checks matter39%
- 🖱️ A guide on where to get my referral link and how to promote it39%
- 🖱️ Higher rewards or a bonus for the first referred AML check22%
- 🖱️ A bonus for the friend who will order an AML check28%
- 🖱️ I don't have a platform or audience17%
- 🖱️ I'm already promoting AML checks39%
- 🖱️ Other (I'll explain in the comments)28%
- 🖱️ I'm not interested in joining the referral program22%
The shares total 279%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 24 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@uniochangenews · 806#1
@itezofficial · 1,184#2
@Quickex_en · 5,942#3
@toncoincheck2 · 804#4
@faucetworld · 4,651#5
@bitcoin_industry · 422,542#6
@Coin_Tradings · 6,260#7
@xroketteam · 193#8
@cryptoexplorer · 4,734#9
@faucetcryptochannel · 9,252#10
@bemineanalytics · 16,710#11
@exwalletss · 248#12
@iexexchanger_news · 1,063#13
@monease_io · 1,689 (as read 14 September 2026)#14
@TradeMaster_insight · 5,369#15
@ourexchangers · 253#16
@zuborev_eth · 333#17
@FixedFloat · 2,073#18
@xr_cheque · 277#19
@Lordbtcb · 596#20
@Online_Income_officiall · 235#21
@cryptophercolumbus_news · 333#22
@Earlyearns · 678#23
@F_TON · 163#24
@crypto_mountains · 436,378#25
@BRO_TOpi · 96#26
@findertoncoin · 1,108#27
@tonairgamesairdrops · 565#28
@dmd_coin · 17,937#29
@ttcoinofficial · 86,621#30
@aviator_predictor2026 · 1,748 (as read 14 September 2026)#31
@taranApp · 1,607#32
@i604isnear · 94#33
@ramjetton · 242#34
@mylifearbitrage · 4,608#35
@Airdrop_baz8 · 579#36
@baxdashia · 41#37
@TheRichMindsetSecret · 1,308#38
@CFOofficialNEWS · 1,447#39
@Vexelman_W3B · 734#40
@farvardinyha · 740#41
@lgcckinyarwanda · 1,289#42
@orgnasa · 187#43
@ehsaan123 · 790 (as read 14 September 2026)#44
@medad_istethnaa · 564#45
@funsky_official · 3,571#46
@Oromiaeducationbureauo1 · 30,011#47
@joingethackedapp · 741#48
@xpmxpm · 173#49
@RTTofficial · 898#50
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bscnursing01 · 38,663
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BestChange — exchanger directory” (@bestchange), 23,668 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bestchange.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.