Рейтинги и топы лучших роботов пылесосов в 2026 году. Как и какой робот пылесос купить для сухой и влажной уборки.
Чат BESTROBOT - https://t.me/+cowCE2voFUs4ZDgy
Независимые тесты bestrobot.info
https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a5d1304689c2151c83543c
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 32% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -2,346. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,878–41,946 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 20:56
39,232
-134
15 Sept 2026, 19:20
39,366
+95
14 Sept 2026, 02:19
39,271
-2
12 Sept 2026, 09:41
39,273
-1,083
10 Sept 2026, 06:01
40,356
-635
7 Sept 2026, 01:59
40,991
+81
4 Sept 2026, 12:00
40,910
-48
3 Sept 2026, 02:05
40,958
-101
2 Sept 2026, 00:26
41,059
-282
1 Sept 2026, 01:29
41,341
+512
31 Aug 2026, 01:35
40,829
+838
30 Aug 2026, 04:47
39,991
+192
29 Aug 2026, 03:54
39,799
+167
28 Aug 2026, 01:28
39,632
-238
26 Aug 2026, 23:15
39,870
-532
26 Aug 2026, 01:28
40,402
-296
24 Aug 2026, 23:35
40,698
-11
23 Aug 2026, 09:56
40,709
-24
21 Aug 2026, 19:25
40,733
-143
20 Aug 2026, 12:44
40,876
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 39,232 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,030
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held
39 (15 July 2026 – 19 September 2026)
Views total
56,400
Reactions total
986
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Sept 2026, 23:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
746
Videos
207
Links
867
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
12m 35s
Average length
1m 24s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,236 reactions across 37 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
962
43.0%
🔥
596
26.7%
❤
506
22.6%
👏
34
1.52%
✍
32
1.43%
⚡
27
1.21%
👀
14
0.626%
❤🔥
12
0.537%
💯
10
0.447%
😎
9
0.403%
🍾
8
0.358%
😍
4
0.179%
🆒
3
0.134%
🤗
3
0.134%
😁
2
0.089%
😢
2
0.089%
🙈
2
0.089%
🤝
2
0.089%
🤣
2
0.089%
🫡
2
0.089%
4 further kinds
4
0.179%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,236 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
71.8%
28 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
28
posts carrying an erid · 22 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
4,290
over 28 measured posts
Median views · rest
4,940
over 9 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjdw25VS
4
2 August 2026
15 September 2026
2SDnjcomwyY
2
31 July 2026
22 August 2026
2SDnje5tnZX
2
17 August 2026
1 September 2026
5jtCeReNx12oajzgzCVD5iU
2
14 August 2026
27 August 2026
2SDnjbvk6A7
1
1 August 2026
1 August 2026
2SDnjc4bZUF
1
4 August 2026
4 August 2026
2SDnjcuN8jd
1
11 September 2026
11 September 2026
2SDnjdg7Cf5
1
14 September 2026
14 September 2026
2W5zFJ97HHK
1
15 July 2026
15 July 2026
5jtCeReNx12oajoi64wk9Qd
1
28 August 2026
28 August 2026
5jtCeReNx12oajxUXaUZ2SQ
1
21 August 2026
21 August 2026
5jtCeReNx12oajzfVmx9fxv
1
22 July 2026
22 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 10 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 19 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Обзор робота-пылесоса Trouver S70 Roller
Этому пылесосу паскали на коробке (28 000 Па) явно пригодились - с классическим резиновым валиком легко выбил 100🎯 на ламинате и поставил рекорд по глубокой очистке ковра🥇 Моющий валик тоже показал себя отлично - отмывает всё, даже кетчуп, и без разводов!
В общем, моделька определенно заслуживает внимания! Смотрим обзор на удобной площадке👇
YouTube📱
VK-видео📱
Яндекс-Дзен📱
R…
BestNEWS 🎤📷
В США уже продают новенький Narwal Freo 20 - ещё одна итерация робота с гусеничным роллером и мытьём горячей водой (60*С). В целом моделька похожа на 👉Narwal Flow 2:
🔸 31 000 Па (больше, больше паскалей!!);
🔸 ассиметричная щётка с распутыванием волос;
🔸 2-лучевая торцевушка;
🔸 стереокамеры (300 объектов);
🔸 преодоление порогов 4 см;
🔸 высота корпуса 95 мм;
🔸 температура стирки 100*С;
🔸 температура сушк…
Распродажа вертикальных пылесосов на Алиэкспресс до 20.09❗️
Лучшая цена с 10.00 до 11.00
🔸 Для сухой уборки
Dreame R10 Pro (обзор☕️) 👉 12 100 руб.
эффективный, с насадками для разных покрытий, без дисплея и авторежима
Dreame R10s Pro 👉 12 700 руб.
как R10 Pro (обзор☕️), но с дисплеем и боковой подсветкой
Dreame T30 👉 15 300 руб.
щётка для ковра,🌪, мебельная насадка 🐱
Dreame R20 (обзор☕️) 👉 18 700 руб.
щетка дл…
Распродажа Алиэкспресс до 20.09❗️
Лучшая цена с 10.00 до 11.00
🔸 Бюджетные роботы
Dreame F20 (обзор☕️) 👉 11 300 руб.
щетка для коротких волос, удлиненная торцевая
Dreame F10 Plus (обзор☕️) 👉16 000 руб.
рез. валик, слабая ВУ, выгрузка мусора
Roborock Q8 Max Pro Plus (обзор☕️)👉18 100 руб.
щётка для шерсти, 🌪, обход предметов, выгрузка мусора
🔸 Средний класс
Xiaomi S40 Pro (обзор☕️) ЯМ 👉24 000 руб.
щётка для шерс…
Обзор робота-пылесоса ECOVACS T30C Prime Omni
Протестировали и со всех сторон рассмотрели новую модельку Эковакса для бюджетного сегмента с характерным индексом Prime в названии. Робот удивил конструкцией и показал неплохие результаты. Кое в чем Prime явно спрогрессировал, но недостатки тоже есть. Говорю обтекаемо, чтобы сохранить интригу - смотрите обзор!😊
YouTube📱
VK-видео📱
Яндекс-Дзен📱
RuTube🥰
Читать на сайте📕
…
Новый лидер по качеству влажной уборки! 😳
Внезапно им оказался Trouver P50 Pro Ultra 🏆 - сравнительно недорогой робот-пылесос, у которого не заявлено каких-то выдающихся способностей. Просто прикладываю скрины с состоянием стенда до и после с указанием количества проходов 👆
Результаты тестов по этой модели уже внесены в 👉Большую сравнительную таблицу.
Секрет успеха прост:
— улучшили прижим салфеток (с двух попыто…
Обзор вертикального пылесоса Trouver G70 Detect 🥉
Ранее вкратце 👉рассказывал о впечатлениях от этой модельки, теперь полноценный обзор! У пылесоса прекрасно проработана эргономика - даже телескопическая труба имеется! Лучшая насадка для мебели, инновационная насадка для пола и масса других достоинств - заслуженный ТОП-3 нашего рейтинга.
Но и без недостатков не обошлось - о них тоже рассказали в большом обзоре:
You…
В сентябре разыграем великолепный и потрясающий мойщик окон Electrolux Liectroux S9 (обзор☕️) 🤩 Он не просто возит тряпочку по стеклу, а полирует поверхность двумя валиками! Ещё и брызгает воду из тройного распылителя!
Заполучить это чудо легко - достаточно лишь выиграть в розыгрыше! Условия участия максимально простые:
1) Подписаться на канал 👉Лучшие роботы-пылесосы 2026
2) Нажать кнопку «Участвовать».
🎯Результат…
Распродажа вертикальных пылесосов на Алиэкспресс до 07.09❗️
Лучшая цена с 10.00 до 11.00
🔸 Для сухой уборки
Dreame R10 Pro (обзор☕️) 👉 12 600 руб.
эффективный, с насадками для разных покрытий, без дисплея и авторежима
Dreame R10s Pro 👉 13 200 руб.
как R10 Pro (обзор☕️), но с дисплеем и боковой подсветкой
Dreame T30 👉 16 000 руб.
щётка для ковра,🌪, мебельная насадка 🐱
Dreame R20 (обзор☕️) 👉 19 500 руб.
щетка дл…
Распродажа Алиэкспресс до 07.09❗️
Лучшая цена с 10.00 до 11.00
🔸 Бюджетные роботы
Dreame D20 👉11 200 руб.
2 щётки для волос и шерсти
Dreame F20 (обзор☕️) 👉 11 600 руб.
щетка для коротких волос, удлиненная торцевая
Dreame F10 Plus (обзор☕️) 👉16 000 руб.
рез. валик, слабая ВУ, выгрузка мусора
Roborock Q8 Max Pro Plus (обзор☕️)👉18 100 руб.
щётка для шерсти, 🌪, обход предметов, выгрузка мусора
🔸 Средний класс и в…
❤9👍8✍4🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @bestrobotvacuum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@bestrobotvacuum edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лучшие роботы пылесосы 2026 | Bestrobot.info” (@bestrobotvacuum), 39,232 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bestrobotvacuum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.