Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бездна отвечает

Channel

Бездна отвечает

@bezdwur

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

205subscribers

+21 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002398723230
TypeChannel
Username@bezdwur
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bezdwur

Growth

184205194.59 August 2026 — 184 subscribers9 August 2026 — 184 subscribers25 August 2026 — 196 subscribers31 August 2026 — 200 subscribers8 September 2026 — 205 subscribers9 August 20268 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 181–208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 22:37205+5
31 Aug 2026, 10:05200+4
25 Aug 2026, 01:34196+12
9 Aug 2026, 17:00184no change
9 Aug 2026, 16:47184first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5380001465194532462623.1%
custom 5435890173810342415623.1%
custom 5368370569202923384415.4%
custom 5228853594588990468311.5%
custom 5328114875824632015311.5%
custom 537738424526834053627.69%
custom 544964444579853085127.69%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 23:09 UTC37 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54496444457985308512

8 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @moy_Appendix_v_rayuPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54358901738103424151

8 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC56 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

это не мой но тоже хороший

custom 53773842452683405361custom 54358901738103424151

8 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC68 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#рисунки

custom 52288535945889904683custom 53683705692029233843

8 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#рисунки

custom 53683705692029233841

8 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC44 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @spelllss

С появлением людей, неумолимо появилось Говно, в котором эти самые люди по воле и по неволе утопают по сей день. Это нормально, у нас на биологическом уровне установлено утопание в Говне. Все рано или поздно вступят, вопрос в том, как быстро выкарабкаются и перестанут нести за собой этот смрад. Но теоретически, если Мы все лишь восприятие чего-то извне, то почему бы нам не менять это самое восприятие, а не это вонюче

custom 53773842452683405361

7 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC55 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Сосать вейпик на зарядке это как сосать сиську у Матери-Розетки

custom 53281148758246320153

6 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC65 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Как можно проповедовать антинатализм (не будем даже заострять внимание на том, что это незаконно в РФ), чтобы тебя восприняли всерьез? Тут точно есть какая-то логическая ошибка, ведь люди любят повторять, как жестока жизнь, и что никто не обещал, что она будет лёгкой и счастливой. Почему тогда эти же самые люди вырывают своих нерожденных детей из сладких объятий не-существования, чтобы обречь на жизнь, которую назы

6 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC65 viewsread 9 August 2026

Спасибо, не забудь в чате похвастаться что круто опустил

6 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC66 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Надеюсь тебя кей изнасилует

custom 54358901738103424154

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @bezdwur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

У автора канала шиза?

  1. да9%
  2. нет17%
  3. третий, секретный вариант74%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бездна отвечает” (@bezdwur), 205 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bezdwur.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.