Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Книги для программистов

Channel

Книги для программистов

@bfbook

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

53,922subscribers

-188 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001371374098
TypeChannel
Username@bfbook
DescriptionКниги по программированию, библиотека электронных книг для разработчиков. По всем вопросам @evgenycarter РКН clck.ru/3Ko9cz
Created13 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 October 2026
Measurements held49
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/bfbook

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

53,92254,11054,0166 August 2026 — 54,110 subscribers6 August 2026 — 54,108 subscribers7 August 2026 — 54,103 subscribers8 August 2026 — 54,102 subscribers9 August 2026 — 54,088 subscribers10 August 2026 — 54,077 subscribers11 August 2026 — 54,068 subscribers12 August 2026 — 54,065 subscribers13 August 2026 — 54,060 subscribers14 August 2026 — 54,066 subscribers16 August 2026 — 54,070 subscribers17 August 2026 — 54,067 subscribers18 August 2026 — 54,065 subscribers22 August 2026 — 54,055 subscribers23 August 2026 — 54,051 subscribers25 August 2026 — 54,043 subscribers26 August 2026 — 54,041 subscribers27 August 2026 — 54,044 subscribers27 August 2026 — 54,051 subscribers29 August 2026 — 54,059 subscribers29 August 2026 — 54,062 subscribers31 August 2026 — 54,063 subscribers1 September 2026 — 54,064 subscribers3 September 2026 — 54,072 subscribers4 September 2026 — 54,073 subscribers8 September 2026 — 54,064 subscribers11 September 2026 — 54,081 subscribers13 September 2026 — 54,072 subscribers14 September 2026 — 54,073 subscribers16 September 2026 — 54,056 subscribers18 September 2026 — 54,041 subscribers24 September 2026 — 54,015 subscribers8 October 2026 — 54,020 subscribers12 October 2026 — 54,011 subscribers14 October 2026 — 53,992 subscribers15 October 2026 — 53,989 subscribers16 October 2026 — 53,980 subscribers17 October 2026 — 53,973 subscribers18 October 2026 — 53,975 subscribers20 October 2026 — 53,972 subscribers22 October 2026 — 53,969 subscribers23 October 2026 — 53,965 subscribers23 October 2026 — 53,954 subscribers24 October 2026 — 53,949 subscribers25 October 2026 — 53,957 subscribers26 October 2026 — 53,946 subscribers28 October 2026 — 53,940 subscribers29 October 2026 — 53,930 subscribers30 October 2026 — 53,922 subscribers6 August 202630 October 2026
49 measurements spanning 85 days, net -188. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,894–54,138 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Oct 2026, 05:2853,922-8
29 Oct 2026, 06:3853,930-10
28 Oct 2026, 01:1753,940-6
26 Oct 2026, 22:1653,946-11
25 Oct 2026, 19:0053,957+8
24 Oct 2026, 21:1053,949-5
23 Oct 2026, 23:5953,954-11
23 Oct 2026, 00:5953,965-4
22 Oct 2026, 01:2053,969-3
20 Oct 2026, 18:4853,972-3
18 Oct 2026, 13:0653,975+2
17 Oct 2026, 09:3653,973-7
16 Oct 2026, 13:0053,980-9
15 Oct 2026, 13:0653,989-3
14 Oct 2026, 12:0653,992-19
12 Oct 2026, 20:4954,011-9
8 Oct 2026, 06:3854,020+5
24 Sept 2026, 23:5754,015-26
18 Sept 2026, 21:5954,041-15
16 Sept 2026, 15:0154,056first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 173 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.29%
avg views ÷ 53,922 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,010
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026
Posts held38 (27 May 2026 – 28 October 2026)
Views total40,060
Reactions total80
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Oct 2026, 22:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,380
Videos
≈285
Links
≈1,240

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

738 reactions across 37 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩15721.3%
🤡13017.6%
❤11816.0%
👍9512.9%
👎638.54%
🔥567.59%
🖕527.05%
🤮395.28%
🤣81.08%
🤬70.949%
🤯50.678%
🤔30.407%
🍌10.136%
🎉10.136%
👏10.136%
😐10.136%
🥰10.136%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 747 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 28 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Oct 2026, 18:50 UTC≈2,980 views6 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

📚 Coding Interview Patterns: Nail Your Next Coding Interview (2024) ✍️ Авторы: Alex Xu, Shaun Gunawardane Это не просто очередной сборник задач — это гайд по выживанию на собесе, где: ✔️ Разбирают, что реально ищет интервьюер, а не просто заставляет тебя вспоминать, что делает O(log n) ✔️ Есть 101 задача с подробными решениями, чтобы ты не просто «зубрил», а реально понимал ✔️ Более 1000 схем и картинок, чтобы да…

👍3🔥2❤1

26 Oct 2026, 20:08 UTC≈3,790 views6 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

📚 Работа с MySQL, MS SQL Server и Oracle в примерах, 2-е издание (2025) ✍️ Автор: Святослав Куликов Книга посвящена практике использования SQL для решения типичных задач. Она не рассматривает теорию реляционных БД — ты сразу переходишь к хардкору. 🔥 В книге тебя ждет: 3 СУБД, 50 примеров, 129 задач, более 500 запросов с пояснениями и комментариями. От SELECT * до поиска кратчайшего пути в ориентированном графе. Ни…

👍2🔥2❤1🤮1

22 Oct 2026, 20:04 UTC≈5,330 views8 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

📚 Designing Machine Learning Systems: An Iterative Process for Production-Ready Applications (2022) ✍️ Автор: Chip Huyen Chip Huyen в своей книге не просто рассказывает, как собирать ML-системы, а учит думать итерациями: от данных и метрик до деплоя и мониторинга. Она показывает, что ML — это не про «магическую модель», а про жизненный цикл: данные, фичи, пайплайны, MLOps и мониторинг — всё как в нормальной инженер…

🔥6❤2

22 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC≈4,760 views4 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

QA митап: про агентов, деньги и эволюцию QA Как оценивать ИИ-агентов, не разориться на токенах и понять, куда движется профессия тестировщика? Соберемся без пафоса, на практике разберем будущее. В программе: 🔘Eval будущего для агентов Как Eval'ы работают сейчас, какие у них проблемы и что будет завтра. 🔘Token FinOps: как инженеры перестают быть расходной статьей Откуда берутся расходы на LLM и как их срезать в три …

❤3👍1

22 Oct 2026, 06:09 UTC≈4,710 views9 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

📚Distributed Systems 4th edition Авторы: M. van Steen and A.S. Tanenbaum (2025) Это четвёртое издание книги «Распределённые системы». Мы сохранили структуру третьего издания, включая примеры (частей) существующих распределённых систем рядом с обсуждаемыми общими принципами. Например, мы добавили материал о блокчейн-системах и рассматриваем их различные компоненты на протяжении всей книги. Также мы вновь использовал…

❤5👍2🔥2

16 Oct 2026, 06:33 UTC≈6,020 views7 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

📚 Automate The Boring Stuff With Python: Practical Programming For Total Beginners, 2nd edition (2019) ✍️ Автор: Al Sweigart В третьем издании книги автор помогает освоить Python, чтобы сделать то, что раньше занимало часы, за считанные минуты. Программирование — это не только для гиков! Здесь даже без опыта можно научиться писать код, который: ❣️ Ищет информацию в интернете, заполняет формы и скачивает контент ❣️…

👍5❤1🔥1

13 Oct 2026, 19:25 UTC≈6,030 views6 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

📚 Реляционные базы данных в примерах (2025) ✍️ Автор: Святослав Куликов В книге автор собрал все ключевые идеи реляционных СУБД — от понятия данных до логики работы транзакций. Тебя ждет фундаментальная теория и наглядная практика проектирования БД: ▪️таблицы, ключи, связи; ▪️нормальные формы, представления; ▪️триггеры, хранимые процедуры и многое другое в примерах. 🔥 Подойдёт тем, кто: ▪️когда-то изучал базы, но…

🔥3❤2👍1

10 Oct 2026, 07:39 UTC≈6,440 views34 reactionsread 30 October 2026

🚀 Подборка полезных IT каналов в Max Системное администрирование, DevOps 📌 https://max.ru/i_odmin Все для системного администратора https://max.ru/bash_srv Bash Советы https://max.ru/sysadminof Книги для админов, полезные материалы https://max.ru/i_odmin_book Библиотека Системного Администратора https://max.ru/i_devops DevOps: Пишем о Docker, Kubernetes и др. https://max.ru/tipsysdmin Типичный Сисадмин https://max…

💩27❤4🖕1🤡1🤮1

28 Sept 2026, 07:56 UTC≈7,930 views7 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

📚 Рефакторинг на максималках (2025) ✍️ Автор: Александр Беспоясов Ты тоже откладывал рефакторинг «на потом»… а потом оно превращалось в багфикс-фестиваль? Эта книга — про то, как перестать бояться и начать чинить код так, чтобы от этого выигрывали и разработчики, и бизнес. Автор объясняет: — зачем рефакторить, если оно и так работает (спойлер: «и так работает» — временно), — как находить самые болезненные места в …

👍5❤1🔥1

22 Sept 2026, 17:39 UTC≈8,410 views6 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

📚 Тестирование программного обеспечения: базовый курс, 3-е издание (2025) ✍️ Автор: Святослав Куликов В основу книги положен многолетний опыт проведения тренингов для тестировщиков, позволивший обобщить типичные для многих начинающих вопросы, проблемы и сложности. Книга будет полезна как джунам, так и опытным специалистам — для систематизации уже имеющихся знаний и организации обучения в своей команде. 🔗 Скачать …

❤4👍1🔥1

17 Sept 2026, 05:14 UTC≈9,170 views16 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

📚 Какие книги должен прочитать каждый Java-программист? 🔹1. Java. Библиотека профессионала (том 1, том 2) Кей Хорстман Оригинал: Core Java (Cay S. Horstmann) Среди учебников «для самых маленьких» эта книга, пожалуй, самая популярная. Она пережила одиннадцать изданий только на русском языке, двенадцатое пока существует только на английском и выпущено в 2021 году. 🔹2. Философия Java Брюс Эккель Оригинал: Thinking …

❤9👍5👎2

15 Sept 2026, 07:28 UTC≈6,900 views11 reactionsread 30 October 2026
Photo

📚 An Elegant Puzzle: Systems of Engineering Management ✍️ Авторы: Will Larson (2019) Есть старая истина: люди уходят не из компаний, а от менеджеров. И если твой тимлид думает, что burndown chart решает все проблемы, то, возможно, пора подсунуть ему An Elegant Puzzle. Эта книга про инженерный менеджмент без занудства: 🟠 Как подбирать размер команды, чтобы не получился «оркестр из трёх барабанщиков и одного кларне…

❤6👍4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @bfbook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

4 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

max.ru155 posts · 27 May 2026 – 6 August 2026 · example post
publication.pravo.gov.ruregistrable domain: pravo.gov.ru1 post · 27 May 2026 – 27 May 2026 · example post
vk.cc1 post · 29 June 2026 – 29 June 2026 · example post
www.youtube.comregistrable domain: youtube.com1 post · 27 May 2026 – 27 May 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Книги для программистов” (@bfbook), 53,922 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bfbook.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.