#网友反馈:🇰🇭戈公省今天已经开始在边境布控警察检查车辆 📣 订阅佤邦新闻频道|东南亚】新闻|爆料|吃瓜 ⚠️ 关注频道 https://t.me/bhdlzidt 🌐 投稿爆料联系 : @damiaicai

Channel
柬埔寨大事件
@bhdlzidt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
871subscribers
-37 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003418131041 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bhdlzidt |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 18 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bhdlzidt |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 871 | -15 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 886 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:12 | 900 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 912 | -14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 926 | +18 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 908 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 908 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 18 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 35s
- Average length
- 48s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
436 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 144 | 33.0% | |
| 👍 | 142 | 32.6% | |
| 👎 | 59 | 13.5% | |
| 🥰 | 59 | 13.5% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 7.34% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 436 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2026 to 4 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#网友反馈:今天凌晨五点一个女的嗨多!感觉有人要绑架他,赖在太子楼下那个烧烤店不肯走!来了很多警察。 📣 订阅佤邦新闻频道|东南亚】新闻|爆料|吃瓜 ⚠️ 关注频道 https://t.me/bhdlzidt 🌐 投稿爆料联系 : @damiaicai
🥰3👎2🔥2
#狗推的呐喊:什么时候才能开门让推推们回家啊? 📣 订阅佤邦新闻频道|东南亚】新闻|爆料|吃瓜 ⚠️ 关注频道 https://t.me/bhdlzidt 🌐 投稿爆料联系 : @damiaicai
👍30🥰12👎7
芭堤雅海滩上,就在警察局对面,竟然有性交易! 今天上午,一名 61 岁的泰国女子和一名 34 岁的英国公民在中央海滩被拘留,地点就在市警察局的街对面。 据目击者称,这对情侣在沙滩上发生性行为,完全没有注意到路人。震惊的游客拍摄了这一幕并报警。这段视频成为了关键证据。 巡逻队迅速赶到现场。两名涉事人员当场被拘留并带往警察局。经查,该英国男子没有合法身份,但经核实,他并未否认事件经过。 目前该案件已按扰乱公共秩序处理。警方正在进行进一步调查,包括确定被拘留者是否受到酒精或毒品的影响。 PS:61岁的泰国女人和34岁的英国人?这位英国兄弟真不挑啊🤣🤣🤣 📣 订阅佤邦新闻频道|东南亚】新闻|爆料|吃瓜 ⚠️ 关注频道 https://t.me/bhdlzidt 🌐 投稿爆料联系 : @damiaicai
❤20🔥17👍14
#突发事件:🇰🇭磅湛省7号园区被宪兵围了,园区门口好多宪兵进去了 📣 订阅佤邦新闻频道|东南亚】新闻|爆料|吃瓜 ⚠️ 关注频道 https://t.me/bhdlzidt 🌐 投稿爆料联系 : @damiaicai
👎50❤13👍11
#西港突发 #南海园区 #铂莱园区 南海 铂莱 有中国警察要扫荡 中国警察要来 那边的赌场 工作人员 刚刚紧急通知搬家撤离! 📣 订阅佤邦新闻频道|东南亚】新闻|爆料|吃瓜 ⚠️ 关注频道 https://t.me/bhdlzidt 🌐 投稿爆料联系 : @damiaicai
👍31🥰20❤18
#网友警告:八号园区的物业我再次命令你们打开大门放我们出去。不然我将下一道圣旨诛你们九族。 温暖表示:莫非传国玉玺在这兄弟手上?? 📣 订阅佤邦新闻频道|东南亚】新闻|爆料|吃瓜 ⚠️ 关注频道 https://t.me/bhdlzidt 🌐 投稿爆料联系 : @damiaicai
🥰24👍18❤13🔥13
#网友爆料:柬埔寨72号园区,永利园区。东方公司。公司老板,管理,长期高压,PC棍子抡冒烟。 老板也是当面一套,背后一套。当着公司面说人性化管理,是人性化,看人的心情管理。公司长期买卖人口。虐待公司底层员工,没业绩就电疗。没有完成任务当月底薪扣完。 诊所床位已经睡不下,里面的员工全部是打吊瓶上班,有几个人脚被打断还继续上班。 管理更是黑心。收员工手机,员工给奶奶打的30000人民币动手术的钱,组长和主管直接贪污,老板包庇管理成,让公司所有员工苦不堪言。 公司长期骗招未成年,以恐吓的理由威胁未成年隐瞒个人真实年龄,前段时间失踪的未成年现在就在永利园区,其中一个未成年因未完成任务长期被打现在精神已经不正常了。昨晚上冲园区。公司更是动用很多保护伞和本地保安的力量强制把人抓回去,今天晚上9点钟救护车已经来了几趟,昨天晚上的人应该是凶多吉少。 公司为了惩罚员工。打员工之后让别人吃屎。没有把别人当人。当着公司几百个人的面在工作室对…
❤40👍22
柬埔寨诸多电诈园区开门放人 狗推迎来“零赔付”时代 在柬埔寨政府决心剿灭电诈园区的高压态势下,先有境内园区纷纷跑路,大举搬家,后有各大园区开门放人,任由员工自行离开,柬埔寨狗推首次迎来“零赔付”。1月14日,柬埔寨总理洪玛奈宣布史上最严打击电诈行动后,不断有宪兵、警察进入园区突击检查。园区方面收到消息后,大规模遣散狗推,发布必须限期搬离的通知。目前,财通、木牌、西港、金边、磅湛、波哥山等部分园区已采取“开放式管理”,有狗推表示,自愿离开的可随时走,愿意留下来的,键盘还在敲冒烟。此番柬埔寨部分园区“零赔付”放人,虽然并非是所有园区统一行动,但自园区设立以来,也为首次。 📣 订阅佤邦新闻频道|东南亚】新闻|爆料|吃瓜 ⚠️ 关注频道 https://t.me/bhdlzidt 🌐 投稿爆料联系 : @damiaicai
❤40👍16
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @bhdlzidt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@bhdlzidt named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 8 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柬埔寨大事件” (@bhdlzidt), 871 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bhdlzidt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.