The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 2 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
Paladinπ‘
@bhutiatradinggroup
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
13,581subscribers
-295 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001689105993 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bhutiatradinggroup |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bhutiatradinggroup |
Topic
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 13,581 | -17 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 13,598 | -13 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 13,611 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 13,619 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 13,627 | -17 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 13,644 | -18 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 13,662 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 13,671 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 13,685 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:35 | 13,692 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 13,696 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 13,702 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 13,713 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 13,721 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 13,728 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 13,731 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 13,736 | -14 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 13,750 | -17 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 13,767 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 13,775 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 June 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 23m 17s
- Average length
- 5m 49s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
1,985 reactions across 18 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 679 | 34.2% | |
| π₯ | 624 | 31.4% | |
| π | 276 | 13.9% | |
| π | 48 | 2.42% | |
| πΎ | 41 | 2.07% | |
| β | 39 | 1.96% | |
| π | 38 | 1.91% | |
| π | 29 | 1.46% | |
| π€ | 28 | 1.41% | |
| π | 26 | 1.31% | |
| π | 21 | 1.06% | |
| π | 19 | 0.957% | |
| π«‘ | 16 | 0.806% | |
| π― | 12 | 0.605% | |
| π€·ββ | 12 | 0.605% | |
| πΏ | 11 | 0.554% | |
| π | 9 | 0.453% | |
| π | 6 | 0.302% | |
| π | 6 | 0.302% | |
| π | 6 | 0.302% | |
| 15 further kinds | 39 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,985 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2024 to 17 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Trade Recap + Outlook (06/27/24)
β€85π10πΎ9π8π7π«‘6π5π5
Phase 1 ACG challenge doneβ . Essentially called the top on GU off that 1H OB on Monday.
π₯83π15π5π4πΏ4π4πΎ2π2
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯58β€16π9πΏ5π4π4πΎ2
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯26β€12π5β3πΎ3π1
DXY low caught as mentioned in the video as wellβ
π₯65π15πΎ5β€3β2π2π€2πΏ1
GU got stopped out due to close SL. If I had not moved my original SL that I had above the 1H OB would have still been in and caught the high but all good. EU rejected off the 4H SIBI noted in the videoβ
π€26π7β€6π4πΎ3π«‘2π₯1
For me I trade challenges aggresively accepting I might lose a few before im funded but i trade my funded accounts very conservatively making sure I dont lose it. Now currently just started my ACG challenges as they allow US clients so lets see how many challenges will it take before I get funded.
β€57π₯15π4π4πΎ4π1
It took me 4 challenges which two of them i traded as one as a trade copier before I finally got my funded account in May and since then I have profited around $23,000.
π₯42β€15π5πΎ4π3π2π1
Photo, posted without a caption
π32π₯12β€3πΎ3π3π2
Photo, posted without a caption
π30β€11πΎ4β3π3
Its fine if you blow a couple challenge to get funded but it shouldnt be normal to lose a funded account.
π41π―11β€8π₯4πΎ2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bhutiatradinggroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@jademastersabode Β· 21,031
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 61 here β alongside 60 others β read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βPaladinπ‘β (@bhutiatradinggroup), 13,581 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bhutiatradinggroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.