Channel
@bidary1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,877subscribers
-127 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001007901386 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bidary1 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bidary1 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 10,877 | -11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 10,888 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 10,890 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 10,892 | -6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 10,898 | -12 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 10,910 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:24 | 10,913 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:27 | 10,922 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:49 | 10,923 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 10,926 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 10,927 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 10,926 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 10,931 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:49 | 10,933 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 10,935 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 10,939 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 10,938 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 10,943 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 10,944 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 10,945 | first reading |
114 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 114 (26 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 9,508 |
| Reactions total | 178 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 02:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
509 reactions across 91 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 436 | 85.7% | |
| 😭 | 59 | 11.6% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 2.16% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.393% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.196% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 98 of the 114 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 547 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 114 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#مظلومیت_امام_زمان امام زمانِ ما در کرهی زمین، بسیار غریب و مظلوم و تنها هستند. اجازه ندهیم بیشتر از این، آقایمان تنهایی بکِشند. بیشتر از این، غریب و مظلوم باشند. و انشاءاللّه وقتی مادرشان فاطمهی زهرا سلاماللّهعلیها از ما سؤال میکنند که با فرزندم مهدی چه کردید؟ بتوانیم در پیشگاه ایشان سرمان را بلند کنیم و بگوییم: بیبی جان، شما شاهد هستید که دنیا را کنار گذاشتیم، بهطرف #امام_زمان ارواحنافداه حرکت کردیم و خ…
❤5
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
#زنگ_بیداری وقتی داری چیزی رو نگاه میکنی یه لحظه فکر کن اگه امام زمان کنارم نشسته بود بازم نگاهش میکردم؟ وقتی داری جایی میری از خودت بپرس اگه امام زمان بود...باهاش اونجا میرفتم؟ اگه حرفی میزنی...یه لحظه فکر کن اگه امام زمان این حرفم رو بشنوه بازم این حرف ارزش گفتن داره؟ و.......... فقط چند ثانیه وقت میگیره ولی تاثیری داره به اندازه ی یک عمر امتحانش کن @bidary1
❤2
سلام امام زمانم💔 دنیا در هجوم بلاهای هولناک آخرالزمان، نفَسش به شماره افتاده است ... زمین و زمان از اضطراب و التهاب بخود می پیچند ... ... خدا شما را برساند وگرنه ما را دیگر تاب اینهمه رنج نیست ... کاش می آمدید و زندگی و آرامش و لبخند را یادمان می آوردید. #نوای_دلتنگی @bidary1
❤6
👆👆👆 ⭕️عمل هر کدام از ما زندانی است برای #امام_زمان ارواحنا فداه ⛔️به فراق عادت کردهایم!!! ⚠️شیطان معنای #انتظار را برایمان عوض نکند. 🎤: استاد حاج آقا زعفری زاده حفظه الله تعالی زمان: ١۵ دقیقه #سخنرانی @bidary1
مانده ام با غم هجران نگارم چه کنم؟ عمر بگذشت و ندیدم رخ یارم چه کنم؟ 🌿 چشم آلوده کجا، دیدن دلدار کجا چشم دیدار رخ دوست ندارم چه کنم؟ 🌿 با نگاهی بگشا عقده ی دیرین مرا کز فراقت گره افتاده به کارم چه کنم؟ 🌿 جلوه ای کن که دمی روی نکویت بینم گر چه لایق نبود دیده ی تارم چه کنم؟ 🌿 اشک می ریزم و با غصه ی دل همراهم گر ز هجران تو من اشک نریزم چه کنم #نوای_دلتنگی سلام مولای مهربانم ❤️ @bidary1
❤3
⭕️ مردم! روز تولد رسول اكرم است عرض ميكنم, روز تولد امام صادق است عرض ميكنم، به خدا قسم! همه ما يا اكثر ما “عاق” امام زمانيم. چرا؟ به جهت اينكه نام آن حضرت را نميبريم، ياد آن حضرت نيستيم. اگر يك منبري، سخن از امام زمان نگويد اعتراض نميكنيم. آخر ما چه چيز جز امام زمان داريم؟ يا بقيةالله! ما را ببخش به جان رسول اكرم و به جان امام صادقي كه به تو عشق ميورزيد. از تو طلب عفو ميكنيم. حضرت استاد آیت الله ابطحی ۱۷ رب…
❤10😭4
#حکایت روزی پیامبر اعظم صلی الله علیه و آله و امیرمؤمنان علی علیه السلام در میان نخلستان نشسته بودند که زنبور عسلی دور پیغمبر اکرم صلی الله علیه و آله شروع به چرخیدن کرد. پیغمبر صلی الله علیه و آله فرمود: «یا علی! می دانی این زنبور چه می گوید؟» حضرت علی علیه السلام فرمود: «خیر.» رسول اکرم صلی الله علیه و آله فرمود: این زنبور ما را مهمان کرده و می گوید: یک مقدار عسل در فلان محل گذاشتم. امیرمؤمنان علیه السلام را بفرس…
❤8
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤️امام رضا علیه السلام درباره ی رسول خدا صلی الله علیه و آله فرمود: سه کار را در مورد مردم انجام نمی داد: کسی را مذمت و تحقیر نمیکرد. لغزش ها و مسائل پنهانی افراد را دنبال نمیکرد. و در موردی تکلم میفرمود که امید ثواب داشت. 📚عیون أخبار الرضا علیه السلام ج۱ ص۳۱۶ @bidary1
❤7
تبریک امام زمانم❤️✨ ایّام ِغم ِدشمن حیدر گشته با شادی ما، دو چشمشان تر گشته حالا که ولادت دو معصوم رسید لبخند به لعل ِشیعه زیور گشته هم روز ولادت امام ِصادق هم روز ولادت پیمبر گشته در هفدهم ماه ربیع الاول عالم ز دو خورشید، منوّر گشته از بوی دو لاله ی بهشت زهرا هر گوشه ی این جهان معطّر گشته ای کاش دگر به حقّ این دو مولود اعلام شود صاحب ما برگشته از کعبه ندا رسد که اهل عالم این شام سیاه ظلم، آخر گشته بیرون بکشد آن…
❤4
#پرسش_پاسخ سوال: لطفاً معنای لعن کردن و زشتی فحش دادن را بفرمائید. پاسخ ما: «المؤمن لایکون سبّابا و لافحاشا»، مؤمن نه سب میکند و نه فحش میدهد. من به شما عرض میکنم که با همه بغضتان به غاصبین حق حضرت زهرا سلام الله علیها فحش ندهید، لعن کنید. برای اینکه اصلاً فحش نباید از دهان شما بیرون بیاید. فحش یعنی حرفی که به اصطلاح بد باشد، ذاتاً بد است. لعن خیلی مهم است. لعن کردن معرفت انسان را نسبت به خدا آنقدر بالا میبرد …
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 114 posts we hold for @bidary1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bidary1 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بیداری از خواب غفلت” (@bidary1), 10,877 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bidary1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.