Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Big 😉 Brother

Channel

Big 😉 Brother

@big_pepper

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

611subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001546974308
TypeChannel
Username@big_pepper
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/big_pepper

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6116156136 August 2026 — 612 subscribers6 August 2026 — 612 subscribers15 August 2026 — 614 subscribers23 August 2026 — 615 subscribers31 August 2026 — 613 subscribers10 September 2026 — 612 subscribers18 September 2026 — 611 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 610–616 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 02:22611-1
10 Sept 2026, 13:01612-1
31 Aug 2026, 17:29613-2
23 Aug 2026, 19:04615+1
15 Aug 2026, 02:56614+2
6 Aug 2026, 17:46612no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:45612first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏240.0%
120.0%
👍120.0%
😁120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC532 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

Американците сравняват фината моторика на двамата си застаряващи президенти. 😏 Байдън изпреварва Тръмп с огромна преднина…

29 Jul 2026, 21:11 UTC559 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Пуснат е трейлър за поредната нова Одисея, но това е версия, по-близка до оригинала, отколкото тази на Нолан.

1

29 Jul 2026, 21:06 UTC51 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Economy_with_NinaPhoto

ЕС провежда конкурс за дизайн на нова евробанкнота.

😁1

29 Jul 2026, 21:02 UTC56 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @RosenNachev

Украйна предложи на Канада 30 години да й дават по $461 милиона за закупуване на газ от същата тази Канада. Киев нарече това „ нос мост за стратегическа енергийна сигурност“. Това е видът взаимноизгодно партньорство, което украинският министър на енергетиката Шмигал обсъди с канадския си колега Ходжсън. Резултатите от тази дискусия са неизвестни. 🤒 Нищо не е ясно, но е много интересно

28 Jul 2026, 20:08 UTC35 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Economy_with_NinaVideo

✨ Китай завърши изграждането на 582-тонен магнит за ядрен синтез. Планирано е производството на електроенергия да започне до 2030 г. Целта е да се създаде „изкуствено слънце“ като източник на практически неизчерпаема и безвъглеродна енергия. @Economy_with_Nina

26 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @RosenNachev

❗️Договори, които не означават нищо Тази карта показва как биха изглеждали САЩ, ако американското правителство беше спазило всички споразумения, официално записани на хартия с индианците. Иде реч за «Indian land areas judicially established» - официална карта на американската Геологическа служба (USGS) от 1978 г. Тя е съставена въз основа на съдебните производства на Комисията по индианските искове. Картата показва

👏1

26 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC37 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Economy_with_Nina

И всичко това става възможно единственно защото Aramco беше национализирана и по-късно проведе IPO❓ Национализацията на Aramco и последвалото IPO са две различни, но свързани събития: 1. Национализацията се случва постепенно между 70-те и 80-те години. Саудитската държава поетапно изкупува дяловете на американските компании (Exxon, Mobil, Chevron и Texaco), докато през 1980 г. придобива пълен контрол. Това означава

26 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC33 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Economy_with_Nina

NEOM – един от най-амбициозните мегапроекти в света, който се изгражда в северозападна Саудитска Арабия, близо до границите с Йордания и Египет. Той е ключова част от програмата Saudi Vision 2030, чиято цел е да намали зависимостта на страната от петрола и да развие нови високотехнологични индустрии. Основните елементи на проекта включват: •The Line – футуристичен линеен град с дължина около 170 км, без автомобили

26 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC24 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @for_financial

Защо Уолстрийт всъщност завишава стойността на SpaceX Миналата седмица водещите инвестиционни банки на Уолстрийт публикуваха своите изследователски доклади за SpaceX, а целите им за оценка граничеха с безумие. Струва си да се помни, че настоящата пазарна капитализация на SpaceX вече е изумителните $1,8 трилиона. С приходи едва от $19 милиарда (до края на 2025 г.), тази оценка е завишена с поне един трилион долара. С

25 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC31 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Economy_with_Nina

🇸🇪 Швеция се отказва от десетилетния си ангажимент за дигитално обучение, връщайки ръкописните и хартиените книги в класните стаи. Страна, някога смятана за лидер в дигиталното образование, сега фокусира значителни ресурси върху традиционните учебници, като същевременно ограничава използването на таблети и екрани, особено за по-малките ученици. Шведските власти отдават тази промяна на нарастващите доказателства, че

👏1

25 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC37 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @red_hot_peppersVideo

🇨🇳 В Китай училищата преминават към „умни дъски“ от следващо поколение: огромни интерактивни панели с изкуствен интелект, поддръжка на 3D модели и разпознаване на ръкописен текст и графики. Цените варират от $300 до $800 за стандартни модели, като по-големите модели започват от $1500. Тези дъски се предлагат в Alibaba от Seewo и подобни компании; те са широко достъпни в китайските училища, а търсенето им нараства в

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @big_pepper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Big 😉 Brother” (@big_pepper), 611 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/big_pepper.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.