Channel
@bigbettypartners
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
450subscribers
-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002265404283 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bigbettypartners |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bigbettypartners |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 450 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 462 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 461 | -15 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:29 | 476 | -22 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 498 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 498 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
22 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 63.6% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 31.8% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Trust is the foundation of every successful partnership 🤝 In our latest Small Talk interview with Big Betty Partners, Gentle Partners CEO Anna shares why transparency is one of the most valuable principles in affiliate business. 💬 Big Betty: What’s your biggest partner red flag at an event? 🎙️Anna: A lack of transparency. When partners aren’t clear about who they are, what they do, or can’t support their claims …
❤3
🔺How to protect your margins with just one question? Before signing up for any affiliate program, ask this: If a player I referred wins big this month, will I start the next month with a negative balance? If the answer is yes… you’re in trouble, darling! Here’s how it works in some programs: 📈 User wins big → your balance goes negative 📉 User loses later → you still don’t get paid Example 👇 📅 January Your user…
❤4
Big Deal Show — from an idea to a live production 🎬 You watched an affiliate show unlike anything the industry had seen. But what did it take to bring it to life? 💌 In this interview, Valery, Big Betty's Head of Brand Marketing, pulls back the curtain to share the inspiration, creative vision, and key principles behind the Big Deal Show. 👉 Swipe through to discover the story behind the show. Stay tuned, captain… …
🥰3🔥1
We did it again, Dear! 💋 Big Betty Partners has been crowned Affiliate Program of the Year at the iGamingNews Awards! A huge thank you to everyone who supports us and grows alongside Big Betty Partners. 🔗 Join Big Betty Partners 📲 or contact our manager
🥰4
Why do smart affiliates choose Big Betty Partners? ☎️ Simple — because Betty is built to help you get the most out of your traffic📈 Here’s what you get: 📌8+ high-converting offers 🚫 No negative carryover 👩🏼💻Dedicated personal affiliate manager 📈Transparent statistics Hybrid | CPA up to €600 | RevShare up to 60% Ready to scale your profits? Your best deal is waiting. 📩 Contact our manager now 🔗 or Join on websit
❤4
iGB L!VE London — here’s how it went! 🇬🇧✨ What an incredible two days filled with inspiring conversations, new connections, and unforgettable moments. A huge thank you to the entire Big Betty Partners team, our amazing partners, and everyone who stopped by our booth. Your energy made this event truly special. But this is only the beginning. Betty has plenty more surprises in store! 📍 Next big stop: SBC Summit, Li…
❤3
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @bigbettypartners. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Big Betty Partners” (@bigbettypartners), 450 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bigbettypartners.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.