Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Billy Six 📸

Channel

Billy Six 📸

@billysix

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

10,707subscribers

-56 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001439882553
TypeChannel
Username@billysix
Created29 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/billysix

Growth

10,70310,76310,7336 August 2026 — 10,763 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,763 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,756 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,755 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,750 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,747 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,740 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,735 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,734 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,727 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,723 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,724 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,721 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,717 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,714 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,709 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,707 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,706 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,704 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,703 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,705 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,703 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,726 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,716 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,707 subscribers10,7076 August 20268 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 33 days, net -56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,694–10,772 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 08:5610,707-9
5 Sept 2026, 05:2110,716-10
3 Sept 2026, 13:1910,726+23
2 Sept 2026, 09:1210,703-2
1 Sept 2026, 10:3710,705+2
30 Aug 2026, 13:1510,703-1
29 Aug 2026, 10:0810,704-2
28 Aug 2026, 07:1210,706-1
27 Aug 2026, 07:0310,707-2
26 Aug 2026, 05:0810,709-5
25 Aug 2026, 03:4310,714-3
23 Aug 2026, 23:0310,717-4
22 Aug 2026, 04:0810,721-3
20 Aug 2026, 21:5310,724+1
19 Aug 2026, 22:0410,723-4
18 Aug 2026, 23:3810,727-7
17 Aug 2026, 20:4510,734-1
16 Aug 2026, 21:5710,735-5
14 Aug 2026, 01:1410,740-7
12 Aug 2026, 20:4610,747first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

298 reactions across 5 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍21070.5%
3712.4%
🥰124.03%
👏82.68%
😍62.01%
🙏62.01%
🔥51.68%
💋31.01%
😁31.01%
🤣31.01%
💩20.671%
💯10.336%
😨10.336%
🤡10.336%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC≈3,460 views115 reactionsread 1 September 2026

„Der Überfall“ auf CORRECTIV - zehn Jahre danach Kaum zu glauben, wie die Zeit vergangen ist . . . Ich kann mich noch erinnern, als wäre es gestern gewesen: „Komm, lass uns da hingehen“, schlug mir der britische Blogger Graham Phillips vor – und spontan entschieden wir, die Berliner Zentrale des „Recherchebüros Correctiv“ aufzusuchen. Es ging um eine preisgekrönte Veröffentlichung zum Abschuss der Boeing „MH-17“, d

👍8121👏8🔥2💩1💯1🥰1

2 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC≈3,260 views35 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

„Der Überfall“ auf CORRECTIV – zehn Jahre danach ( "The Attack" on CORRECTIV – ten years later ) ⬇️ Text ⬇️

👍26🥰4😁3🔥2

5 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC≈3,340 views50 reactionsread 1 September 2026

⬆️ . . . 2023 hatte das Gericht den Umstand, dass die Botschaft eine fünfseitige Telefon-Liste aller ihr bekannten Anwälte übergeben hatte, als Erfüllung von § 7 des Konsulargesetzes definiert – auch, wenn mir das gar nichts gebracht hatte, da ich aus dem Gefängnis heraus nicht frei kommunizieren konnte. Rückwirkend fand ich heraus, dass auf dieser Liste überhaupt nur ein einziger Strafverteidiger stand – und dieser

👍33🙏63😍3💋1💩1🔥1🤣1

5 Jul 2026, 13:27 UTC≈2,630 views40 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

⬆️ . . . Dennoch war es vorab notwendig, noch rechtzeitig meine Feststellungsklage gegen die BRD anzupassen: Verfassungsrechtler hatten mir geraten, die Verstöße gegen das Konsulargesetz während meiner Venezuela-Haft 2018/19 nicht (wie zuletzt beantragt) aus dem Klagekatalog herauszunehmen. Grund: Für das Gericht wäre die Hürde, die Bundesregierung wegen ihres Angriffs auf meine Grundrechte zu verurteilen (Antragspun

👍294🤣2🥰2😍2💋1

5 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC≈2,540 views58 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Lebenszeichen aus Weißrussland Ich komme in letzter Zeit leider nicht mehr dazu, Eure Nachrichten zu beantworten. Jeden Tag gibt es hier Programm und Ausflüge. Und hoffentlich bald genügend Ruhe und besseres Netz, um die neuen Erkenntnisse auch zu publizieren. Dank Klaus, einem lieben Berliner Auswanderer in Belarus, konnte ich immerhin noch rechtzeitig einen wichtigen Schriftsatz für das Verwaltungsgericht Berlin

👍419🥰5💋1🤡1😍1

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @billysix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Billy Six (en.wikipedia.org)
“…'switched sides'.{{cite web|title= Billy Six Telegram post|url=https://t.me/billysix/1698|accessdate=11 May 2024}} As of late 2024, Six continues…”
read 23 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Billy Six 📸” (@billysix), 10,707 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/billysix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.