Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🏆Биоленты лентирование |советы| обучение

Channel

🏆Биоленты лентирование |советы| обучение

@biolentaobychenie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,287subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001568634976
TypeChannel
Username@biolentaobychenie
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/biolentaobychenie

Growth

1,2851,2911,2887 August 2026 — 1,285 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,285 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,287 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,288 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,291 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,289 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,290 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,289 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,287 subscribers1,2877 August 20265 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 29 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,284–1,292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 20:161,287-2
1 Sept 2026, 21:251,289-1
29 Aug 2026, 22:571,290+1
24 Aug 2026, 04:161,289-2
20 Aug 2026, 20:041,291+3
17 Aug 2026, 20:381,288+1
14 Aug 2026, 13:541,287+2
7 Aug 2026, 22:461,285no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:251,285first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

131 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5239.7%
👍3022.9%
🔥2216.8%
❤‍🔥1713.0%
😍53.82%
👎21.53%
😁21.53%
👌10.763%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC125 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/volosatielenty Все мастер классы здесь. Покупка возможна только после изучения описания и прослушивания голосовых которые относятся к конкретным мастер классам.

31 Jul 2026, 16:59 UTC111 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @biolentyVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

31 Jul 2026, 16:59 UTC110 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @biolentyPhoto

Даю ответ в голосовом, многим будет полезно

14 Jun 2026, 21:11 UTC395 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍2

14 Jun 2026, 21:11 UTC388 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему я не горю желанием продавать курс по волосатым лентам. Кто думает также напишите. Если не так думаете, то это прекрасно👍

1

6 Jun 2026, 13:13 UTC505 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Запросов на обучение изготовлению волосатых лент стало настолько много, что я уже начинаю терять контакты людей Мне пишут в TikTok, Telegram, Instagram, в директ, под постами, в комментариях. Поэтому я решила создать лист ожидания для тех, кто хочет изучить этот навык. Времени осталось не так много. Скоро эти пряди начнёт делать каждый второй мастер. Вопрос только в том, насколько качественно. Если хотите стать о

3👌1

30 May 2026, 11:59 UTC466 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Конечно ещё есть к чему стремиться. Но всё же я уже довольна этим результатом. Разработала несколько типов сборки таких лент. С густым наполнением и легким. С прозрачной основой и непрозрачной для разных запросов наращивания и исходных данных родных волос.

🔥51

30 May 2026, 11:56 UTC444 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Это промежуточный результат. Набивка уже была аккуратная но сама лента не очень

❤‍🔥7👍32

30 May 2026, 11:55 UTC417 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Биоленты волосатые ленты скрытые ленты. Конечно, небо и земля по сравнению с тем, что я делала вначале. Все-таки процесс набивки волос занимает время для постановки руки. В лентировании волос такого нет: понял процесс, и уже с первого опыта можно получить профессиональный результат. Здесь же знания сами по себе не гарантируют результат. Конечно, если руки привыкли делать всё аккуратно, результат будет, но нужно вре

9❤‍🔥4🔥4😍3

17 Apr 2026, 12:35 UTC618 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Набор прядей на заколках, работа стоит 6800руб. Две пряди по 10 см на височные, одна 20 см на затылок. Изготовлены из капсульных прядей после нескольких наращиваний.

10❤‍🔥6😍2

10 Apr 2026, 10:17 UTC684 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Китайцы подделали моё изобретение так же халтурно и отвратительно, как и русские. Почему никто не может понять смысл этого инструмента? Потому что никому нет дела до самой сферы лентирования волос и до мастеров . Я жила этой темой, я хотела лучшего для мастеров, поэтому думала как упростить нам жизнь. Но тот кто подделывает, он думает только о том как заработать, без цели помочь тому кто покупает. Это сразу видно

9👍2👎1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @biolentaobychenie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ОТЖ_Ады Кондэ
@ADA_OTZH · 55,820
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🏆Биоленты лентирование |советы| обучение” (@biolentaobychenie), 1,287 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biolentaobychenie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.