Channel
@biscuit_swee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
133subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002897912260 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @biscuit_swee |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 27 June 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/biscuit_swee |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:35 | 133 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 135 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 132 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 131 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 131 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 27 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
426 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5785094190618646994 | 238 | 55.9% | |
| custom 5785206388049320677 | 91 | 21.4% | |
| custom 5784951533279909627 | 53 | 12.4% | |
| custom 5785071491716487570 | 34 | 7.98% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 1.64% | |
| 🌭 | 3 | 0.704% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 426 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
БУУМ арт на палитру!! да я писала что некомфортно оставлять группу без обнов но пока что все силы уходят на думы по поводу житухи и возню с работой…….. энивей поучаствовала в клевом ивенте, башое спасибо организаторам 🌈🌈
custom 578509419061864699420custom 57849515332799096279custom 57852063880493206777custom 57850714917164875701
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩Итоги летней палитры! 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 1. @n3b1t13va 2. @Ermachelloo 3. @ailirchiart 4. @plysk_ka 5. @lika_vante 6. @biscuit_swee 7. @alusikch 8. @alcocherry 9. @d_stepik 10. @vkogritaart 11. @gaze_to_stars 🤩Вы можете ознакомиться с результатами других палитр в тгк организаторов: 🤩 @FrishaWal 🤩 @mewulenss 🤩 @yorunoku0 🤩 @seven_seva 🤩 @chi_owchi 🤩 @ciucvaa 🤩 @hatsu_mt2 🤩 @fosstet
custom 57850714917164875701
🤩 все еще участвую в ивентах и конкурсах! не очень довольна этой работой, фигово время рассчитала и пришлось под конец быстро сворачиваться 💻 повод заняться своим тайм менеджментом и мейби в будущем эту картинку доработать #mors_pic
custom 578509419061864699430custom 57850714917164875702custom 57852063880493206771
шлепнула 😃
custom 578509419061864699425custom 578520638804932067714custom 57849515332799096279custom 57850714917164875703
пробираясь через дела родила реф штуку для подружани!!🤩 появилось еще желание шлепнуть хотя бы скетчик по бекрумсам так что надеюсь запал не спадет
custom 578509419061864699419custom 57852063880493206776custom 57849515332799096275custom 57850714917164875702
ладно ЗАСИДЕЛАСЬ травма сильна мне теперь некомфортно оставлять соцсети надолго wipка пока сидим рендерим пилим!!🤩
custom 578509419061864699424custom 57849515332799096278custom 57852063880493206774custom 57850714917164875702
а также нас тут стало СИЛЬНО больше что меня конечно не может не порадовать всем привет!!👋 щас работаю над штукой для подружки которую покажу позже, а пока закину сюда старый арт по саге, рисовала в период работы в стол и по-моему закидывала в альбом оф паблика
custom 578509419061864699424custom 578495153327990962714custom 57852063880493206779custom 57850714917164875704
рисовалось в условиях жуткого спидрана и неотложных дел 🥹 зато вписалась в движуху
custom 578509419061864699445custom 578520638804932067710custom 57849515332799096278
скетчевые бриджертонские дивы!!
custom 578507149171648757019custom 57850941906186469945
✨диснеевское
custom 578509419061864699419custom 57852063880493206777
и седня вот дбдшечку закину, а завтра еще что-нибудь))) пока разрисовывалась сообразила себе небольшой накоп рисунков на первое время, так что живем
custom 578509419061864699426
бискв pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @biscuit_swee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@biscuit_swee named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“бискв” (@biscuit_swee), 133 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biscuit_swee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.