Channel
@blackdevilss_97
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 4 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003904573816 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blackdevilss_97 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blackdevilss_97 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:22 | 3 | no change |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:47 | 3 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 October 2026 – 4 October 2026) |
| Views total | 136 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Oct 2026, 18:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Здравствуйте, не против заключить сз с нашим каналом? Канал: @Il1usion_shop след: @hharno папка: рп допы: 2:2 @SU1VS 3:3 @DA4MN0 4:4 @BOIYSH6 5:5 @SU0MC 6:6 @Djdidmk 7:7 @Vjsisok 8:8 @tifafafaf 9:9 @WWW1NWW
здравствуйте, хотел бы заключить с вами союз. макс. пдп: 14:14 (я не работаю с переходниками и вз допами) папка: рп/вз. личные правила: @lindvvv канал: @irizzki след: @L1NDW1ND допы: @HUGXXH @K1TUR @KRMKSN @K1YOKI @L1NDW1N @reyosh @xoosooe @lleewm @rremilx @frftto @SWITT1G @VI1VP @muuuxwyaxsssy извините, если у нас уже есть союз — просто удалите чат у двоих.
приветствую, видел ваше сообщение в анонке, я согласен заключить союз пдп 1:1-9:9 макс папки:рп КАНАЛ: @Dixieskie ПРАВИЛА: @union_dixi след: @ASlM0V допы: 2:2 @barrbie_v 3:3 @Barrbie_jk 4:4 @M0SKHV 5:5 @L1SHH4 6:6 @Y30NSH1 7:7 @zzertx3 8:8 @Tovii7 9:9 @ascenii
Канал @SR1NS правила! Папка: актив+/рп/вз След : 1:1 @S3R4R1 Допы 3:3 2:2 @aideeid 3:3 @hanter_468
канал @V4ZDUXANSKIE след @ck_swan 2:2 @K3ESD 3:3 @Gleeede 4:4 @wl8qs
@neroxu @ck_swan
канал - @AZARTSKIEFMM след. - @ck_swan 2:2 @CTRNT7L 3:3 @KL1TF7 4:4 @Mefedronnxss 5:5 @mr_dop1 6:6 @mr_dop2 7:7 @mr_dop3
Канал: @HRDHM404 След: @nrtxvc Папка: рп+актив Доп: 2. @f4ke_you 3. @uroborx 4. @jes_03r 5. @V1LER3AN 6. @NAR1K0 7. @EBLANKA_MIKA 8. @D3MENTRA 9. @AVE7TUR 10. @ST69NG3R
Канал: @kirinosato Папка: рп След: @jen_wjen 1:1 Допы: 2:2 @E1V7NS 3:3 @Dr4cky 4:4 @Jijiwooyoon 5:5 @WHOREANGELLS 6:6 @QWSKI1 7:7 @Die_woww 8:8 @sselliin 9:9 @NEELdarty 10:10 @D1LA4R Правила: @kirisatounions
следящий: @KristallNerval папка: рп канал: @spektaklgrehov допы : 10:10 @undertakerkrash @xlikely @kicynR @mmandarrin @Mary_Banan @hstxta @CKY4HEHKO @CEKYHDO4KA @C_i_aa @kamila_131
здравия желаю. хотел бы предложить вам рассмотреть возможность заключения союза с каналом @vnrfmm. ➖➖ Канал: @vnrfmm След: @sacredsinl папка: актив/актив+рп пдп: 8:8 макс. Допы: @ggtwll @glkkjk @guzxl @WYUZ0 @GGGUIPOM @NNHPOI @dswlmy Если союз есть, то приношу свои извинения!
Здравствуйте, не желаете ли заключить союз?🚨 Канал — @POHUISTYFML Папка актив+рп Следящий я — @LECLERClc16 Допы: Активные допы: @pohuist_1111 @pohuist_2222 @pohuist_3333 @fgpglggdd @pohuisty_5555 @D1N1ZLL @D2N1ZLL @D3N1ZLL @D4N1ZLL Будем рады крепкому и долгому союзу! 🧸
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blackdevilss_97. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@blackdevilss_97 named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Black Devil's союзы” (@blackdevilss_97), 3 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blackdevilss_97.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.