Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Black Rabbit (Public Journal)

Channel

Black Rabbit (Public Journal)

@blackrabbittrader

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,273subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001466249184
TypeChannel
Username@blackrabbittrader
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/blackrabbittrader

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,2732,3102,291.57 August 2026 — 2,310 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,310 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,308 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,305 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,299 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,295 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,290 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,289 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,288 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,287 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,285 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,283 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,279 subscribers19 September 2026 — 2,273 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,267–2,316 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 01:202,273-6
14 Sept 2026, 13:012,279-4
11 Sept 2026, 02:592,283-2
5 Sept 2026, 23:402,285-2
1 Sept 2026, 19:372,287-1
29 Aug 2026, 13:282,288-1
26 Aug 2026, 09:432,289-1
23 Aug 2026, 20:052,290-5
20 Aug 2026, 07:132,295-4
17 Aug 2026, 15:252,299-6
14 Aug 2026, 00:372,305-3
10 Aug 2026, 14:312,308-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:302,310no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:232,310first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
466.7%
👍233.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 03:35 UTC250 viewsread 7 August 2026

9 hours left, after this, will be the last time you can get a.i. money machines, or volume profile bootcamps, they will not be available moving forward.

Signed Ev

20 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC303 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I’ve been getting a lot of DMs from people who want to join TapeScript, but simply can’t justify the full price right now. I get it. TapeScript is priced high for a reason, it can replace months of manual strategy building, testing, and research. But I also don’t want money to be the only thing keeping serious traders on the outside. So for the next 48 hours, I’m opening a rare chance to get into TapeScript Lite OR

Signed Ev

16 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC371 viewsread 7 August 2026

The Market's Daily Rhythm: When Volatility Actually Shows Up The market breathes on a schedule: loud at the open, sleepy at midday, alive again into the close. This U-shape has been documented since the 1980s — and cutting the dead hours is one of the cheapest upgrades you can make to any strategy. See the daily rhythm and learn how to trade around it. 👇 Read the full post on the TapeScript blog →

Signed tapescript

15 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC310 viewsread 7 August 2026

The Donchian Channel Breakout: The Turtle Rule Tested Across Global Futures This is the rule that turned total beginners into the legendary Turtle Traders. A study across 28 futures markets and five decades says the trend edge behind it is real — if you can stomach a low win rate and trade it across markets. Here's the breakout rule, why it works, and how to test it on futures and forex. 👇 Read the full post on the

Signed tapescript

15 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC271 viewsread 7 August 2026

The Monday Effect: Does the Day of the Week Really Move Markets? For decades, Mondays were the market's weakest day — a pattern documented by one of finance's biggest names. But here's the twist: it faded once everyone knew about it. That lesson is worth more than the trade. Learn the weekend effect, why it decayed, and how to check if a day-of-week edge still breathes on your market. 👇 Read the full post on the Ta

Signed tapescript

14 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC252 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Sell in May and Go Away? What the Halloween Effect Really Shows It sounds like folklore — until you see the data. An American Economic Review study found stock gains piled up from November to April and nearly vanished May to October, across 37 countries. Is the "Halloween effect" real, and does it still work? Here's the research, plain and simple, plus how to test the seasonal split yourself. 👇 Read the full post o

1

Signed tapescript

14 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC253 viewsread 7 August 2026

Opening Range Breakout: The Day-Trading Setup That Passed a Real Backtest Most "day trading strategies" die the moment you backtest them. This one didn't. A 2023 study put the classic Opening Range Breakout through years of data and found a real edge — but only with strict stops and letting winners run to the close. We break down the exact rules and show you how to test ORB on futures or forex in minutes. 👇 Read th

Signed tapescript

13 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC253 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The Turn-of-the-Month Effect: When the Calendar Quietly Pays Traders What if almost the ENTIRE long-run gain of the stock market happened in just 4 days each month? That's not a hook — it's what 80 years of data (1926–2005) showed in the Financial Analysts Journal. The "turn-of-the-month" effect is one of the cleanest, hardest-to-fake edges in finance. We explain who found it, why it works (it's the plumbing of ho

1

Signed tapescript

13 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC247 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Volatility Targeting: The Boring Risk Trick That Beat the Market Most traders obsess over the perfect entry. But a Journal of Finance study found the biggest free upgrade to almost any strategy is something else: trade SMALLER when markets are wild, BIGGER when they're calm. It's called volatility targeting — and it raised risk-adjusted returns across nearly everything the researchers tested, mostly by dodging the

Signed tapescript

12 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC272 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Overnight vs Intraday: Where Stock Market Returns Actually Come From Surprising fact: for many strategies, almost ALL the profit happens while you're asleep — overnight, between the close and the next open — and the daytime session gives some back. A Journal of Financial Economics study ("A Tug of War") split 14 well-known strategies into overnight vs intraday and found the edge almost always lived in just ONE wind

Signed tapescript

12 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC276 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

137 Years of Proof That Trend-Following Works (and How to Test It) Skeptics love to say trend-following "used to work but doesn't anymore." So AQR researchers tested it across 137 YEARS — 1880 to 2016 — through the Great Depression, two world wars, and 2008. It held up the whole way: Journal of Portfolio Management, 67 markets, after realistic costs. We explain the simple moving-average rule behind it, why it's ca

Signed tapescript

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blackrabbittrader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gold Signals Daily 🔔🏆
@Gold_SignallsDaily · 43,232
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Black Rabbit (Public Journal)” (@blackrabbittrader), 2,273 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blackrabbittrader.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.