9 hours left, after this, will be the last time you can get a.i. money machines, or volume profile bootcamps, they will not be available moving forward.
Signed Ev

Channel
@blackrabbittrader
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,273subscribers
-37 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001466249184 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blackrabbittrader |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blackrabbittrader |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 2,273 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 2,279 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 2,283 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 2,285 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 2,287 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 2,288 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 2,289 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 2,290 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 2,295 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 2,299 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 2,305 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 2,308 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 2,310 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 2,310 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
9 hours left, after this, will be the last time you can get a.i. money machines, or volume profile bootcamps, they will not be available moving forward.
Signed Ev
I’ve been getting a lot of DMs from people who want to join TapeScript, but simply can’t justify the full price right now. I get it. TapeScript is priced high for a reason, it can replace months of manual strategy building, testing, and research. But I also don’t want money to be the only thing keeping serious traders on the outside. So for the next 48 hours, I’m opening a rare chance to get into TapeScript Lite OR…
Signed Ev
The Market's Daily Rhythm: When Volatility Actually Shows Up The market breathes on a schedule: loud at the open, sleepy at midday, alive again into the close. This U-shape has been documented since the 1980s — and cutting the dead hours is one of the cheapest upgrades you can make to any strategy. See the daily rhythm and learn how to trade around it. 👇 Read the full post on the TapeScript blog →
Signed tapescript
The Donchian Channel Breakout: The Turtle Rule Tested Across Global Futures This is the rule that turned total beginners into the legendary Turtle Traders. A study across 28 futures markets and five decades says the trend edge behind it is real — if you can stomach a low win rate and trade it across markets. Here's the breakout rule, why it works, and how to test it on futures and forex. 👇 Read the full post on the…
Signed tapescript
The Monday Effect: Does the Day of the Week Really Move Markets? For decades, Mondays were the market's weakest day — a pattern documented by one of finance's biggest names. But here's the twist: it faded once everyone knew about it. That lesson is worth more than the trade. Learn the weekend effect, why it decayed, and how to check if a day-of-week edge still breathes on your market. 👇 Read the full post on the Ta…
Signed tapescript
Sell in May and Go Away? What the Halloween Effect Really Shows It sounds like folklore — until you see the data. An American Economic Review study found stock gains piled up from November to April and nearly vanished May to October, across 37 countries. Is the "Halloween effect" real, and does it still work? Here's the research, plain and simple, plus how to test the seasonal split yourself. 👇 Read the full post o…
❤1
Signed tapescript
Opening Range Breakout: The Day-Trading Setup That Passed a Real Backtest Most "day trading strategies" die the moment you backtest them. This one didn't. A 2023 study put the classic Opening Range Breakout through years of data and found a real edge — but only with strict stops and letting winners run to the close. We break down the exact rules and show you how to test ORB on futures or forex in minutes. 👇 Read th…
Signed tapescript
The Turn-of-the-Month Effect: When the Calendar Quietly Pays Traders What if almost the ENTIRE long-run gain of the stock market happened in just 4 days each month? That's not a hook — it's what 80 years of data (1926–2005) showed in the Financial Analysts Journal. The "turn-of-the-month" effect is one of the cleanest, hardest-to-fake edges in finance. We explain who found it, why it works (it's the plumbing of ho…
❤1
Signed tapescript
Volatility Targeting: The Boring Risk Trick That Beat the Market Most traders obsess over the perfect entry. But a Journal of Finance study found the biggest free upgrade to almost any strategy is something else: trade SMALLER when markets are wild, BIGGER when they're calm. It's called volatility targeting — and it raised risk-adjusted returns across nearly everything the researchers tested, mostly by dodging the …
Signed tapescript
Deal ends tomorrow FYI.
Signed Ev
Overnight vs Intraday: Where Stock Market Returns Actually Come From Surprising fact: for many strategies, almost ALL the profit happens while you're asleep — overnight, between the close and the next open — and the daytime session gives some back. A Journal of Financial Economics study ("A Tug of War") split 14 well-known strategies into overnight vs intraday and found the edge almost always lived in just ONE wind…
Signed tapescript
137 Years of Proof That Trend-Following Works (and How to Test It) Skeptics love to say trend-following "used to work but doesn't anymore." So AQR researchers tested it across 137 YEARS — 1880 to 2016 — through the Great Depression, two world wars, and 2008. It held up the whole way: Journal of Portfolio Management, 67 markets, after realistic costs. We explain the simple moving-average rule behind it, why it's ca…
Signed tapescript
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blackrabbittrader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Black Rabbit (Public Journal)” (@blackrabbittrader), 2,273 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blackrabbittrader.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.