5 measurements spanning 32 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 127–134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 22:15
133
+4
30 Aug 2026, 19:28
129
+1
24 Aug 2026, 13:47
128
-1
9 Aug 2026, 01:31
129
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:55
129
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12m 10s
Average length
3m 03s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
173 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
42
24.3%
🔥
39
22.5%
👍
19
11.0%
😁
16
9.25%
👏
15
8.67%
😱
12
6.94%
🙉
11
6.36%
🥰
10
5.78%
🏆
4
2.31%
💯
3
1.73%
🎉
1
0.578%
🙏
1
0.578%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 20 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blagovich_law. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 December 2025 to 20 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Иждивенец или как бабушка-соседка, которой вы помогаете регулярно по доброте душевной, может стать вашим наследником
❔Кто считается иждивенцем?
В общем смысле иждивенец - это лицо, которое полностью или преимущественно содержится за счет другого человека и не имеет возможности самостоятельно обеспечивать себя.
К иждивенцам могут относиться:
- несовершеннолетние дети;
- нетрудоспособные родители;
- супруги, утратив…
The shares total 216%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Абсолютно ответственно заявляю, это гениальная зарисовка на тему семейной жизни!
https://music.yandex.ru/album/9123582/track/59507169?ref_id=23CA41E4-8A50-4F12-B25B-EF9794D18543&utm_medium=copy_link
Тверской суд удивил. Сегодня две беседы прошло там и обе с присутствием судьи. Он задавал много вопросов и ему было интересно:)
И даже получили судебный запрос для нотариуса.
П.с. обычно в коридор выходит помощник и озвучивает дату судебного заседания. Мы уже привыкли не ходить на беседу.
Кстати, сейчас на домодедовскую переехало около 14 судебных участков мировых судей! Приезжайте заранее на заседания, а то суд может внезапно переехать! 😂
Хоть фото и кривое, но зато последние два процесса рассматривают очень внимательно. Даже надежда появилась на то, что отменят решения, с которыми мы спорим :)
Интересный был опыт 🙂
Оказалось очень сложно читать. Я еще была заграницей, хотела сделать красивую картинку на берегу моря. Реальность показала, что либо картинка, либо я ))))) шум моря полностью загрушал речь )
В преддверии Нового года мы с коллегами запустили небольшой челлендж по озвучиванию книги «Кафе на краю земли».
Казалось бы, просто читать вслух.
Но получилось гораздо больше.
Разные голоса. Разные интонации.
Разный жизненный опыт. Это удивительно объединяет.
Мы записывали небольшие фрагменты и делились ими друг с другом.
Без идеального звука. Без студии. Без «правильного» тембра.
Просто на мобильный телефон.
Свое…
ОТМЕНА ЗУМА из-за командировки.
Доброе утро, любители книг! В марте читаем эту книгу мега-бестселлер Джиа Джианг «А я тебя «нет». Как не бояться отказов идти напролом к своей цели.
Мы с коллегами-юристами выбрали ее по рекомендации.
Присоединяйтесь 29.03 в 11.00 к обсуждению!
Подключиться к конференции Zoom
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83955116338?pwd=D7kyB9CwZ3DLSbMnqvoG189bIN9VWQ.1
Идентификатор конференции: 839 …
Юристам платят за паранойю и опыт десятков других семей
У меня лично было несколько друзей, которые на вопрос как к главе семейства: "есть ли у тебя завещание или брачный договор?" шарахались от меня так, словно мой вопрос непременно принесет несчастье в дом. Тема сразу закрывалась.
Только опыт подсказывает, что такая тактика точно приносит несчастье в дом и бросает женщин, парализованных горем, в бесконечную бездн…
👍7❤5🥰4
Signed Наталья Благович
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blagovich_law. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 216%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Семейный совет Благович. Судебная практика, кейсы, психология.” (@blagovich_law), 133 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blagovich_law.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
