Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Виноваты книги

Channel

Виноваты книги

@blamethebooks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,702subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001912949318
TypeChannel
Username@blamethebooks
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/blamethebooks

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,7024,7354,718.56 August 2026 — 4,735 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,735 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,734 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,728 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,730 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,727 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,730 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,726 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,727 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,726 subscribers4 September 2026 — 4,727 subscribers10 September 2026 — 4,719 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,710 subscribers18 September 2026 — 4,702 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,697–4,740 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 01:214,702-8
14 Sept 2026, 05:404,710-9
10 Sept 2026, 03:574,719-8
4 Sept 2026, 23:014,727+1
1 Sept 2026, 14:544,726-1
29 Aug 2026, 06:064,727+1
26 Aug 2026, 16:464,726-4
23 Aug 2026, 09:064,730+3
16 Aug 2026, 15:484,727-3
12 Aug 2026, 13:364,730+2
9 Aug 2026, 23:364,728-6
7 Aug 2026, 07:554,734-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:304,735no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:214,735first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

787 reactions across 10 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
787100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 787 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blamethebooks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC376 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩это могло быть ещё одним разочарованием года, если бы я хоть чего-то ожидала от истории, но я не стала мучать себя и тратить время зря, и просто бросила её на половине всё, начиная от сюжета, заканчивая образами персонажей - мимо начинается всё в городе с говорящим названием Лейк-Комо, где главная героиня после развода возвращается в родительский дом, а точнее - подвал😂 ей за тридцать, она работает чертёжницей в с

48

10 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC476 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

воскресный отдых на реке Дон 🤩🤩 после недельной парилки в каменных джунглях мы с друзьями сбежали от жары в сельскую местность фиксировать градиент перехода от зелени до небесно-голубого. бла-го-дать 🤍 взяла с собой летнюю книжную хотелку, но мало того, что мне не удалось её даже открыть, книга, лежавшая около бассейна, намокла и испортилась…реанимирую под прессом из толстячков БК 💔 задолжала вам полуотзыв на брош

73

7 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC797 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

3/5 - главное разочарование года 🏰🤩 эту книгу можно было бы назвать «джейн эйр» для поколения, которое застало холодную войну, если бы Бронте вдруг решила, что роману не хватает советской угрозы и взрывающейся атомной бомбы то ли это дарк-академия в декорациях восьмидесятых, то ли подростковый ужастик, то ли комедия абсурда, то ли искренняя попытка сказать что-то важное, но сказать так, чтобы никто не догадался, я

70

5 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC875 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

что я посмотрела за последнее время📌🎥 «одиссея» - потрясающее КИНО с множеством смыслов, и для каждого человека он будет свой. все, начиная от музыкального сопровождения до нолановского витка сюжета - поражает до глубины души. кино не для попкорнового просмотра, не для развлечения, а для поисков ответов на важнейшие вопросы что древности, что современности последние слова Одиссея в фильме не дают мне покоя. «закули

73

4 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC924 views69 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

месяц начался не с самых положительных впечатлений…книга и того гляди улетит в худшие года (я максимально субъективна в своей оценке) 🤩 за 200 прочитанных страниц я не запомнила ни одного из персонажей, чтобы хотя бы различать их между собой. это смесь викторианской готики и дарк академии, но на дворе, если верить описанию, конец двадцатого века, 1984 год. за территорией школы - холодная война, ядерная угроза, но у

69

2 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC861 views84 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

5/5 и претендент на цикл года!🤧💔 конец 44 года. мне было семь, я не помнила время без войны описываемый ужас книги с романтичным пейзажем на обложке и «райским» названием - разбивает сердце с первой главы все начинается в маленькой деревушке на севере Италии в 1944 году. меня встретили фашисты, партизаны и страх, который въедается в стены домов. семилетняя Грациэлла, смотрит на мир глазами ребенка, который не пони

84

31 Jul 2026, 07:43 UTC939 views105 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

июльские итоги настолько шикарны, насколько вообще возможно в летний период нечитуна🙏 каждый день эти истории спасали мои не самые позитивные мысли, за что им огромное спасибо располагаю в градации от лучшего к лучшему: «Некк» «парадизо» - завтра отзыв 🤩 «цвета истины» «музей неудач» «тильда здесь» «Клара и солнце» делитесь своими итогами ниже🤍

105

30 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC982 views77 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

7 августа с виновниками начинаем погружаться в историю расследования от мастерицы Тартт 🤩💔 приятная компания из самых талантливых и умных детективов телеграма приглашает вас присоединиться

77

28 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC≈1,040 views86 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📹🗞️🤩что будет, если совместить в один сюжет историю жизни трех сестер на фоне обветшалого конного ранчо, не игнорировать ревность, неразделенную любовь, и отцовское холодное равнодушие? получится старая мелодрама нулевых, где всё начинается с поцелуя на фоне заката, а заканчивается перевернувшей все вверх дном пощечиной от сценариста я неспроста сравниваю сюжет с мелодрамой/драмой нулевых: сильно мне напомнила истор

86

27 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC953 views102 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

домашние кадры выходных 📸 у нас в городе был масштабнейший ураган, и слава богу, никаких планов не было. службы спасения до сих пор пытаются откачать воду с дорог и разобрать завалы после падений деревьев зато я успела досмотреть несколько начатых сериалов и прочесть больше запланированного на выходные как прошли ваши выходные?🤩

102

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @blamethebooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ZOYA BOOKS | КНИГИ ЗОИ
@zoyabooks · 79,371
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
КнигоЛер
@val_kk_val · 30,407
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
читающий домик 🛋
@chitayushiydomik · 24,600
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
Bookspace
@anya_bookspace · 27,301
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Виноваты книги” (@blamethebooks), 4,702 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blamethebooks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.