Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for - ๐—๐—‚๐—๐–ผ๐— ๐—‚๐—‡๐–ฟ.แŸ

Channel

- ๐—๐—‚๐—๐–ผ๐— ๐—‚๐—‡๐–ฟ.แŸ

@blazeswife

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

23subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003631410003
TypeChannel
Username@blazeswife
Created25 March 2026 โ€” measured โ€” dated from the channelโ€™s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/blazeswife

Growth

202321.56 August 2026 โ€” 22 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 22 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 21 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 20 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 21 subscribers7 September 2026 โ€” 22 subscribers14 September 2026 โ€” 23 subscribers6 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 20โ€“23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 07:3623+1
7 Sept 2026, 08:3822+1
28 Aug 2026, 14:0421+1
20 Aug 2026, 21:4620-1
13 Aug 2026, 18:2621-1
11 Aug 2026, 12:3222no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:3222first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

277 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
customย 53481442668309737818129.2%
customย 53101072418886509827326.4%
customย 53505647987298510727025.3%
customย 53504973892181444915319.1%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegramโ€™s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 277 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC101 views56 reactionsread 11 August 2026

๐Ÿคฉ ๐Ÿคฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฑ ๐—๐–พ๐—‹๐–พ ๐—‚๐–ฟ ๐—’๐—ˆ๐—Ž ๐—๐—๐—‚๐—‡๐—„ ๐–จ'๐—† ๐—๐—๐–พ ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ ๐Ÿค๐Ÿค ๐Ÿค๐—‚๐—‹๐—… ๐–ก๐—…๐–บ๐—“๐–พ.๐ŸŒŸ

customย 535056479872985107220customย 534814426683097378117customย 531010724188865098215customย 53504973892181444914

6 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC100 views46 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

๐Ÿค๐—๐—๐—ˆ ๐—’๐—ˆ๐—Ž ๐–บ๐—‹๐–พ ๐—๐—๐—ˆ ๐—†๐–พ?๐Ÿค๐ŸŒŸ

  1. ๐Ÿคฉ๐–พ๐—Œ๐–ผ๐—ˆ๐—‡๐—ˆ๐–ผ๐—‚๐–ฝ๐—ˆ | ๐—Œ๐—๐—‹๐–บ๐—‡๐—€๐–พ๐—‹๐Ÿค75%
  2. ๐Ÿคฉ๐—ˆ๐—‡๐—ˆ๐–ผ๐—‚๐–ฝ๐—ˆ | ๐–บ๐–ผ๐—Š๐—Ž๐–บ๐—‚๐—‡๐—๐–บ๐—‡๐–ผ๐–พ๐Ÿค38%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

customย 534814426683097378116customย 535056479872985107213customย 531010724188865098212customย 53504973892181444915

6 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC99 views38 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

๐Ÿค ๐Ÿคฉ๐‘–๐‘ก๐‘โ„Ž ๐‘–๐‘  . . .๐Ÿ”ฃ๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€

  1. - ๐Ÿคฉ๐—‡๐—‡๐—ˆ๐–ผ๐–พ๐—‡๐— ๐ŸŒŸ๐Ÿค90%
  2. - ๐Ÿคฉ๐—Ž๐—‚๐—…๐—๐—’ ๐ŸŒŸ๐Ÿค16%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

customย 535056479872985107213customย 531010724188865098210customย 53481442668309737819customย 53504973892181444916

6 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC95 views44 reactionsread 11 August 2026

๐Ÿ— ๐Ÿค๐Ÿค๐–ข๐—๐–บ๐—‡๐—‡๐–พ๐—… ๐—…๐—‚๐—Œ๐—. ๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐Ÿค ๐Ÿข.๐Ÿฃ @STHmaingirls๐Ÿค ๐Ÿค ๐Ÿข.๐Ÿค @silvazecfdaily๐Ÿค ๐Ÿค ๐Ÿข.๐Ÿฅ @sonazeConf๐Ÿค ๐Ÿค ๐Ÿข.๐Ÿฆ @Blazecfdaily๐Ÿค๐Ÿค ๐Ÿข.๐Ÿง @SILVERCONF๐Ÿค๐Ÿค ๐Ÿข.๐Ÿจ @soniconfessions๐Ÿค๐Ÿค ๐Ÿข.๐Ÿฉ @blazecf๐Ÿค๐Ÿค ๐Ÿข.๐Ÿช @ShadAzeCF๐Ÿค๐Ÿค ๐Ÿข.๐Ÿซ @animalanomalycf๐Ÿค๐Ÿค ๐Ÿฃ.๐Ÿข @UnknownHillsTelegram๐Ÿค๐Ÿค

customย 535049738921814449113customย 531010724188865098212customย 534814426683097378112customย 53505647987298510727

6 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC92 views45 reactionsread 11 August 2026

๐Ÿ— ๐Ÿคฉ ๐—Ž๐—‹ ๐—ˆ๐—‰๐—‚๐—‡๐—‚๐—ˆ๐—‡ ๐–บ๐–ป๐—ˆ๐—Ž๐— ๐—†๐–พ.๐Ÿค ๐Ÿคฉ ๐ŸคฉN๐–พ๐—๐–พ๐—‹ ๐—€๐–พ๐— ๐—ˆ๐—‡ ๐—†๐—’ ๐–ป๐–บ๐–ฝ ๐—Œ๐—‚๐–ฝ๐–พ ๐Ÿคฉ

customย 534814426683097378114customย 535049738921814449112customย 531010724188865098211customย 53505647987298510728

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @blazeswife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

๐Ÿค๐—๐—๐—ˆ ๐—’๐—ˆ๐—Ž ๐–บ๐—‹๐–พ ๐—๐—๐—ˆ ๐—†๐–พ?๐Ÿค๐ŸŒŸ

  1. ๐Ÿคฉ๐–พ๐—Œ๐–ผ๐—ˆ๐—‡๐—ˆ๐–ผ๐—‚๐–ฝ๐—ˆ | ๐—Œ๐—๐—‹๐–บ๐—‡๐—€๐–พ๐—‹๐Ÿค75%
  2. ๐Ÿคฉ๐—ˆ๐—‡๐—ˆ๐–ผ๐—‚๐–ฝ๐—ˆ | ๐–บ๐–ผ๐—Š๐—Ž๐–บ๐—‚๐—‡๐—๐–บ๐—‡๐–ผ๐–พ๐Ÿค38%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

๐Ÿค ๐Ÿคฉ๐‘–๐‘ก๐‘โ„Ž ๐‘–๐‘  . . .๐Ÿ”ฃ๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€

  1. - ๐Ÿคฉ๐—‡๐—‡๐—ˆ๐–ผ๐–พ๐—‡๐— ๐ŸŒŸ๐Ÿค90%
  2. - ๐Ÿคฉ๐—Ž๐—‚๐—…๐—๐—’ ๐ŸŒŸ๐Ÿค16%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

๐– ๐–ญ๐–จ๐–ฌ๐– ๐–ซ ๐–ง๐–ฎ๐–ฒ๐–ฏ๐–จ๐–ณ๐– ๐–ซ โŸก ๐“ฌ๐“ธ๐“ท๐“ฏ
@animalanomalycf ยท 122
1 post
โ™ฏึด เฃชห– เฃช ๐˜ฝ๐™‡๐˜ผ๐™•๐™€ ๐™๐™ƒ๐™€ ๐˜พ๐˜ผ๐™:| ๐–ข๐–ฟ ร— ๐“ญ๐“ช๐“ฒ๐“ต๐”‚ ึด เฃชห– เฃช . / . !
@blazecf ยท 147
1 post
๐–ฅป ๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ป๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ง ร— ๐˜‹๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜บ^แชฒ
@blazecfdaily ยท 124
1 post
โ—ฆโ€ขโ—โ—‰โœฟ๐’๐ก๐š๐๐€๐ณ๐ž ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐Ÿ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐งโœฟโ—‰โ—โ€ขโ—ฆ
@ShadAzeCF ยท 64
1 post
๐„ฐ ๐–ฒ๐–จ๐–ซ๐–ต๐– ๐–น๐–คโ‹ฎ ๐—ฐ๐—ณ ร— ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—น๐˜†
@silvazecfdaily ยท 214
1 post
ั€ะตัั‚! ๐‘บ๐‘ฐ๐‘ณ๐‘ฝ๐‘ฌ๐‘น ๐“ญ๐“ช๐“ฒ๐“ต๐”‚ ึบย ๐“ฌ๐“ฏ
@SILVERCONF ยท 353
1 post
๐–ฅป ๐˜š๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ป๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ง ร— ( ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ) ๐˜‹๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜บ^แชฒ
@sonazeConf ยท 135
1 post
(ะฝะฐะฑะพั€ ะฒ ะฐะดะผ) โ€น๐Ÿน ๐—Œ๐—ˆ๐—‡๐—‚๐–ผ ๐–ผ๐—ˆ๐—‡๐–ฟ๐–พ๐—Œ๐—Œ๐—‚๐—ˆ๐—‡ / ๐–ฝ๐–บ๐—‚๐—…๐—’
@soniconfessions ยท 152
1 post
๏นซ ๐˜š๐˜›๐˜๐–ฌ๐–บ๐—‚๐—‡ ๐—€๐—‚๐—‹๐ฅ๐ฌ แด„๊œฐร—แด…แด€ษชสŸส.แŸ
@STHmaingirls ยท 47
1 post
ใ…ค โ™ฏโ•เญจ ๐—จ๐—‡๐—„๐—‡๐—ˆ๐—๐—‡ ๐—›๐—‚๐—…๐—…๐—Œ . .
@UnknownHillsTelegram ยท 74
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ- ๐—๐—‚๐—๐–ผ๐— ๐—‚๐—‡๐–ฟ.แŸโ€ (@blazeswife), 23 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blazeswife.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.