🟢 RH Rocket [160.67K / 16%] $ROCKET 🟩 ROBIN @ Uniswap v3 💰 USD: $0.000160 👁 FDV: $160.7K ⇨ 341.7K [22h] 💧 Liq: $19.8K [x1] 𓍼 📊 24h Vol: +$114.6K Age: 3d 🚀 1H: -58% ⋅ $1.8K · 🅑3 Ⓢ9 👥 TH: 2.2⋅2.2⋅2.2⋅2.1⋅2.1 [33%] 🤝 Total: 251 ⋅ avg 23w old 🌱 Fresh 1D: 5% ⋅ 7D: 18% Dex: ✅ 📱 Soc: 🐦 💬 🌍 💹: 🍌 BBot · 🐸 GM · 🦅 DxS · 📊 Def 0xf126a270bd9c7bd9c0ab610f07ca09bf1c653f28 COVE · MAE · BSD · BBW · DS · EXP · TW 🤩 142.7K⋅2d ♻️

Channel
blazing_influencers_bot
@blazing_influencers_bot
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10subscribers
-1,715 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002036764921 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blazing_influencers_bot |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blazing_influencers_bot |
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 10 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 9 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 8 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 5 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 2 | -1,732 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 1,734 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 1,732 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 1,726 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 1,725 | first reading |
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
✖️ Via channel ↣ by @RocketOnRH (600) ↳ 🪶 $Rocket Aped some, so this RACCOON actually have a Rh Linkedin and looks like lore is kinda gucci 0xF126a270Bd9c7bd9C0Ab610f07ca09BF1C653F28 💬 10 🔁 8 ❤️ 53 👀 12K ⌚ 2d ago
🪶 $Rocket Aped some, so this RACCOON actually have a Rh Linkedin and looks like lore is kinda gucci https://x.com/RocketOnRH/status/2084718538913185809 0xF126a270Bd9c7bd9C0Ab610f07ca09BF1C653F28
✖️ Via channel ↣ by @haydenzadams (1.8M) ↳ again, hasn't been a week yet and as an optimist I would love to see more come out of it in the longer scale of things. The more success stories the better right @frankdegods Agree with the point on your thread on needing to create distribution Expect a bit of a different approach here We shipped the beta version fast, still very much early innings for this project on ou…
https://x.com/haydenzadams/status/2085756242761335148 again, hasn't been a week yet and as an optimist I would love to see more come out of it in the longer scale of things. The more success stories the better right
Basically looking in trying out the "good tokens" that corrected once the new coin rotations took place, and looking to see a greater rally once they've floored + reclaimed highs + expansion w/ clear S/L invalidation if wrong thesis
Sushi is trying to also compete but they are also spreading thru many. Would like to see a breakout attempt on many of them before
Those are my thoughts atm via launchpad scenes
🟢 Pons [28.38M / 27%] $PONS 🟩 ROBIN @ pons 💰 USD: $0.028384 👁 FDV: $28.4M ⇨ 66.7M [11d] 💧 Liq: $650.3K [x1] 𓍼 📊 24h Vol: +$2.5M Age: 24d 🚀 1H: 107.9% ⋅ $167.3K · 🅑85 Ⓢ79 👥 TH: 25.9⋅1.3⋅1.2⋅1.1⋅1.0 [36%] ↳📦 0.0% 🤝 Total: 23.4K ⋅ avg 41w old 🌱 Fresh 1D: 6% ⋅ 7D: 19% Dex: ✅ 📱 Soc: 🐦 🌍 💹: 🍌 BBot · 🐸 GM · 🦅 DxS · 📊 Def 0x39dbed3a2bd333467115de45665cc57f813c4571 COVE · MAE · BSD · BBW · DS · EXP · TW 🚀 860.9K⋅33x⋅24d
But then that leaves room for $PONS again, still leading the game in mindshare, marketcap, and continuing to ship !
Would love to be wrong on that end but so far on day 3 that's the vibe I'm getting + reading similar thoughts on timeline/chats
It was clear they were spreading thru a lot of the eco pre-public of pools, but now they aren't even indexing coins (liluni, froge) and the divide of what happened w/ FRONG had too much ambiguity so feels w/e
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @blazing_influencers_bot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@PowsGemCalls · 112,90610 postsMoneymancalls
@moneymancalls1104 · 10,5856 postsWasta Degeneracy Journal.
@WastaDegeneracy · 14,2372 postsWatcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 627,7152 postsA’s alpha
@missorplays · 35,0002 postsAdam's Crypto Playground
@AdamsCryptoPlayground · 7,6051 postDegen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,2711 postIssa’s Thoughts 💭
@issasthoughts · 10,2531 postManul Capital
@manulcapital · 2661 post⚡️Pikachu's place⚡️
@pikachusplace · 3,1511 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@maestro · 45,5957 postsBasedBot
@based_eth_bot · 172,1575 posts$ROCKET on Robinhood Portal
@rocketonrh · 322 postsWatcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 627,7152 postsBloom Solana
@BloomSolana_bot · 14,1941 postBinance Stocks
@bstocksfinance · 111 postHPOS10I
@HPOS10I · 12,5661 postManul Capital
@manulcapital · 2661 postStonkFun
@StonkFunXyz · 2,8971 postYOLO
@YoloCoinRH · 1451 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@blazing_influencers_bot named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“blazing_influencers_bot” (@blazing_influencers_bot), 10 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blazing_influencers_bot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.