Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
23 measurements spanning 89 days, net -110. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,017–6,160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 12:18
6,033
-5
31 Oct 2026, 08:37
6,038
-9
28 Oct 2026, 07:20
6,047
-7
22 Oct 2026, 15:09
6,054
-4
19 Oct 2026, 12:10
6,058
+7
16 Oct 2026, 07:45
6,051
-5
13 Oct 2026, 17:58
6,056
+10
8 Oct 2026, 10:54
6,046
-6
2 Oct 2026, 06:59
6,052
-12
16 Sept 2026, 12:37
6,064
-5
13 Sept 2026, 02:40
6,069
-3
9 Sept 2026, 00:20
6,072
-7
3 Sept 2026, 19:18
6,079
-6
31 Aug 2026, 07:24
6,085
-6
28 Aug 2026, 17:17
6,091
+5
25 Aug 2026, 15:42
6,086
-12
22 Aug 2026, 15:37
6,098
-8
19 Aug 2026, 12:54
6,106
-17
16 Aug 2026, 08:57
6,123
-5
12 Aug 2026, 22:25
6,128
first reading
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 6,033 subscribers
Avg views / post
629
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
37 (24 June 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
11,326
Reactions total
148
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 17:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,440
Videos
≈35
Links
≈1,080
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 32s
Average length
2m 16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
280 reactions across 34 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
136
48.6%
👍
79
28.2%
🔥
28
10.0%
🎉
18
6.43%
👏
7
2.50%
👌
4
1.43%
😱
3
1.07%
🤝
2
0.714%
🥰
2
0.714%
🙏
1
0.357%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 280 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
حملة بينانس لتقدير مجتمعها
تقديرًا لثقتكم ودعمكم المستمر، تطلق بينانس حملة خاصة للتعبير عن إمتنانها لمجتمعها.
سيكون المستخدمون المؤهلون مؤهلين تلقائيًا للمشاركة في تقاسم مكافآت التداول والحصول على عائد يصل إلى 10% APR.
تعرّف على المزيد هنا 👇
https://www.binance.com/ar/support/announcement/detail/dad3f7336cd343fd9752c63b21f8d52a?ref=Y1VXX9CE&utm_source=MenaArTelegram&utm_medium=GlobalCommunity&utm_campaign=Communi…
اختراق Binance.. هل حان وقت شراء العملات قبل الارتداد؟
رغم الاختراق الذي تعرضت له Binance، فإن تراجع السوق كان محدودًا نسبيًا، ومع الاستقرار الحالي أرى أن رد فعل السوق كان أكثر هدوءًا مما كان متوقعًا. إذا استمر الاستقرار وتمت إعادة عمليات السحب بشكل طبيعي، فقد نشهد عودة قوية للسيولة وثقة المتداولين، وهو ما قد يدفع العديد من العملات إلى ارتفاعات جيدة.
لهذا أرى أن المرحلة الحالية قد تكون مناسبة لبناء مراكز تدريجية في …
كل الشكر والتقدير لجميع أعضاء هذه المجموعة الكرام، و لكل من صوت لي و دعمني في هذه الرحلة حتى دخلت ضمن 10 الأوائل. 🙏❤️
الدعم الكبير في هذه الانتخابات ليس مجرد تصويت، بل هو ثقة ومساندة لن أنساها أبدًا. أقدّر لكم هذه المبادرة الكريمة، وأعتز كثيرًا بكل شخص وقف إلى جانبي وساندني في هذه الرحلة حتى استطعت الدخول ضمن الفائزين 🏆
جزاكم الله خيرًا جميعًا، وبارك الله فيكم وفي جهودكم. هذا الدعم سيبقى بالنسبة لي من أجمل ما عشته…
🤍 اليوم هو آخر يوم أطلب فيه منكم التصويت والدعم، وبعده سأختتم هذه الحملة. ❤️
طوال هذه الرحلة، كنتم دائمًا إلى جانبي، وكان دعمكم وتشجيعكم يعنيان لي الكثير. شكرًا من القلب لكل شخص صوّت، شارك، أو دعم حملتي بأي طريقة. 🫶
لنمنحها دفعة أخيرة معًا! 🚀
إذا لم تصوّت بعد، فهذه فرصتك الأخيرة للتصويت. صوتك قد يصنع الفرق. ❤️
https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/cact26user/668?uc=app_square_share_link&us=copylink
جمعت أكبر عدد من نقطة في لعبة «كنوز قافلة» خلال رحلتي ✨ انضم إلى رحلة قافلة وشارك في مكافآت بقيمة 1,000,000 دولار بعملة USDC.
https://www.binance.com/ar/ti/act/Qafila?utm_medium=app_share_link_telegram
✔️ منشور مهم من هنا
https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/cpos/380536436085580?r=NLW63171&l=ar&uco=99MgkcfoYlvsG4oTEi4TSA&uc=app_square_share_link&us=copylink
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @blkhayat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
القناة الرسمية علاء الشامي للعملات الرقمية IDOs, Crypto trading|توصيات عملات رقمية بيتكوين @m2zealaa · 26,758 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 3 September 2026
Bitcoin Alerts | أخبار البتكوين @BitcoinAlerts0 · 20,752 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“توصيات كريبتو otmanino” (@blkhayat), 6,033 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blkhayat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.