Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Blockkid cartel

Channel

Blockkid cartel

@blockkidcartel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,903subscribers

+335 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001799812344
TypeChannel
Username@blockkidcartel
CreatedBetween 1 April 2022 and 30 June 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/blockkidcartel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,56813,90313,735.56 August 2026 — 13,568 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,568 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,626 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,642 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,650 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,661 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,667 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,673 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,672 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,677 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,686 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,692 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,679 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,678 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,681 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,684 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,693 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,695 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,692 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,700 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,699 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,708 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,717 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,814 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,820 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,819 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,826 subscribers7 September 2026 — 13,838 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,877 subscribers12 September 2026 — 13,889 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,893 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,894 subscribers17 September 2026 — 13,903 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +335. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,518–13,953 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 21:1813,903+9
15 Sept 2026, 21:1813,894+1
14 Sept 2026, 06:5713,893+4
12 Sept 2026, 17:3713,889+12
10 Sept 2026, 18:1913,877+39
7 Sept 2026, 16:5813,838+12
4 Sept 2026, 18:1513,826+7
3 Sept 2026, 05:5413,819-1
2 Sept 2026, 04:0413,820+6
1 Sept 2026, 03:4813,814+97
30 Aug 2026, 04:5913,717+9
29 Aug 2026, 01:3513,708+9
27 Aug 2026, 22:4613,699-1
26 Aug 2026, 19:1213,700+8
25 Aug 2026, 17:3413,692-3
24 Aug 2026, 17:2413,695+2
23 Aug 2026, 03:4913,693+9
21 Aug 2026, 14:2713,684+3
20 Aug 2026, 13:0413,681+3
19 Aug 2026, 15:4113,678first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
81.5%
avg views ÷ 13,903 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,300
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held32 (20 June 20261 September 2026)
Views total45,350
Reactions total2,297
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 02s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15,481 reactions across 32 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8,33853.9%
🕊3,13620.3%
💯2,87018.5%
🏆1,1377.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,481 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 14:08 UTC≈5,150 views549 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Кто с кем ссорится?😱😱 Кто с кем спит?😮😮😮 Просто бред 🤦 Я просто пришел дать любви и ухватить чуть сыра 🧀 для ребятишек💰💰

329💯117🕊83🏆20

25 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC≈15,300 views622 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Тяжелое время бывает у всех,оно пройдет. В этом мой посыл. Я не дед инсайд. Просто много думаю

390🕊114💯92🏆26

25 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC≈12,900 views530 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Но это норм. Большую часть дня, я искренне рад всему . Я вообще могу лежать в кровати и широко улыбаться.

329🕊101💯87🏆13

25 Aug 2026, 22:35 UTC≈12,000 views596 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Ночью мысли бывают тяжелые как гири 🏋🏿 . Я знаю это. Всем знакомо это

354🕊123💯108🏆11

21 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈11,400 views226 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Москва, давно не виделись с вами 28 числа встречаемся читать “4 The Better” и ваши любимые треки в MM Bar Проводим лето красиво 🎫 Билеты FC/DC, 18+

142🕊47💯34🏆3

17 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC≈9,150 views437 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Есть тут Москвичи? Вспоминая,кажется что в Мск я уже очень долго не выступал. Под конец августа увидимся 🥳

💯219136🕊78🏆4

14 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC≈11,300 views393 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

245🕊75💯58🏆15

14 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈11,100 views448 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

А вы знаете как зовут мою собаку?…

277🕊89🏆70💯12

12 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC≈8,410 views174 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Санкт-Петербург! 29 августа встречаемся с вами на Trapgladiator Почитаем рэпа, посмотрим бои, жду всех своих 🎫 билеты

109🕊36💯25🏆4

12 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC≈9,360 views266 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

175🏆51🕊32💯8

7 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC≈9,030 views688 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Ну привет друзья мои спасибо за теплые слова вам. Это не для коммерции,а для лучшего 🎧🏆.! есть вайб тут на ресток футболок LoveWorldPrayGod или че нить новое лучше 🤔. Дайте понять внизу 👇🏾

407🕊142💯106🏆33

6 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC≈9,440 views298 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

https://band.link/4thebetter anim by jozfie

176🏆71🕊42💯9

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @blockkidcartel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Whole Lotta Swag
@wholelottaswag1 · 38,074
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 31 August 2026
YASMI FACE CONTROL
@yasmi1eader · 50,689
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
KIZARU | HAUNTED FAMILY
@mostvaluableghost · 108,544
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 August 2026
ALBLAK 52
@alblaker · 56,328
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 August 2026
ATLANTA
@atlantaact · 46,164
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 27 August 2026
ICEGERGERT
@iceicegergert · 73,309
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Blockkid cartel” (@blockkidcartel), 13,903 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blockkidcartel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.