🫠🫠🫠
❤107😁39👍1👎1

Channel
@bloo_me
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
7,719subscribers
-174 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001181765160 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bloo_me |
| Created | 10 December 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bloo_me |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:30 | 7,719 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:09 | 7,725 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 7,730 | -5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:07 | 7,735 | -8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 06:35 | 7,743 | -7 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 04:37 | 7,750 | -7 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 11:31 | 7,757 | -11 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 22:18 | 7,768 | -16 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 7,784 | -24 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 7,808 | -12 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 7,820 | -5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 7,825 | -14 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:42 | 7,839 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:13 | 7,848 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 7,856 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 7,863 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 7,867 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 7,875 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 7,879 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 7,883 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 21 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
670 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 441 | 65.8% | |
| 😁 | 122 | 18.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 53 | 7.91% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 1.64% | |
| 😭 | 11 | 1.64% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 1.19% | |
| 🗿 | 7 | 1.04% | |
| 🥴 | 5 | 0.746% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.597% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 0.597% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.299% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.149% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.149% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 670 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2024 to 24 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🫠🫠🫠
❤107😁39👍1👎1
і сміх і гріх 😅
😁70❤26🤔3👍2👎2😢2🕊1
*кінець приколу*
❤91❤🔥5👍2👎1
А зараз, з приходом весни, все більше почалися форситись зелені баночки цього бренду 🧐🥗 Тому щира рекомендація: Ідентичним аналогом для LA SULTANE DE SABA BODY LOTION THE VERT GINGEMBRE — є бюджетніший парфумований крем для тіла Elizabeth Arden Green Tea Honey Drops Body Cream 🫶🏻 Понюхавши перший, з’являється державю, що це Elizabeth Arden 😳
❤15👎1👏1
Так активно, як засоби для тіла La Sultan De Saba, ТікТок продавав нам тільки дайсон 😄🫣 Потрібно було покористуватися цілою лінійкою, щоб дати відгук ☑️ • ціна точно завищена, вау-ефекту як такого – не існує; • про запах «дорогого шлейфу», як говорять у кожному огляді важко сказати, бо це справа смаку. Якщо описувати його, то він класично важкий, але й не такий вже стійкий та шлейфовий (хіба спрей); • щодо батеру д…
❤4❤🔥4👎1
Ой що підписниця нам надіслала 👀🥰 З’явилая інформація, коли в Києві планують відкрити три магазини Zara. 3 квітня та два 5-го. А у Львові вказана дата відкриття — 11 квітня. Хто чекає? Пишіть в коментрях з якого ви міста 🤍
❤🔥17❤7🗿6👎1
Добірка манікюру з зірочками ✨ Виглядає мило і стильно водночас 🤍 Як тобі? Обрала б собі його?
❤29❤🔥3👎1🤝1
Аню Тейлор-Джой звинувачують у нормалізації голодування 😕 Актриса виклала знімок в інстаграмі, на якому позує у корсеті. Користувачі здивувалися об'єму талії зірки і навіть почали її звинувачувати у нормалізації голодування. Коментарі від підписників: «Як вона дихає?», «А де ребра?», «Ви доб'єте людей такою рекламою краси. Будь ласка, видаліть це» Зараз це іноді спостерігається за нашими блогерами також 🙈 Тебе це …
❤🔥21🥴5❤4👍1👎1🤔1
Просто скажіть як це працює 😁🫠
❤74😁10❤🔥1👍1👎1
до речі, так
❤84😭11🤝3😁3❤🔥2👍1👎1🗿1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @bloo_me. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BlooMe” (@bloo_me), 7,719 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bloo_me.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.