Channel
@bloopers_ua
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
369subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002205441249 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bloopers_ua |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bloopers_ua |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 369 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:20 | 370 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 370 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
96 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 35.4% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 24.0% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 12.5% | |
| custom 5832260147073780752 | 5 | 5.21% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 5.21% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 3.13% | |
| custom 5237759703198474072 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5253900813067101773 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5283187018237484968 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5282999160662926097 | 1 | 1.04% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.04% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пройшов майже тиждень з моменту, як я подивився «Одіссею». Я тільки зараз зібрав свої думки до купи і готовий сформулювати їх у текст. Спойлерів тут не буде, тільки власні враження. Якщо ви тут, щоб запитати: «Чи варто це дивитися?», то я відповім — так. Однозначно варто. У мене не було такого захопливого перегляду кіно вже дуже багато років. Три години я безперервно сидів і дивився твір, сюжет якого і так добре з…
❤8🔥2
Побачив Одіссею. Прожив не дарма
🔥11❤6🤣1
Драпатий 💪
🔥10❤4
Ну вони ж виправлять ту коряву анімацію облич, так? Ну так? Ну виправлять же? Поділюсь з вами думками про новий "Шрек 5" Чергова непотрібна пригода заколупавшого всіх орга, разом з віслюком. Міміка — надмірна, картинка дуже перенасичена, а події відбуваються в такому темпі, що не зрозуміло нічого. Те, що треба для gen A. Пристарілим зумерам, як от мені, краще першої та другої частини уже не буде 😂
custom 58322601470737807523😁2🤡1
🥳 «Невразливий» знову вразив Слухайте, а 4 сезон реально вдався. Автори тримали планку до кінця, події розвивалися бадьоро, а фінал взагалі закрутили дуже круто. Мені щиро сподобалося — емоцій після перегляду купа, і серіал досі вміє дивувати. Але окремий кайф — це затравка на п'ятий сезон. Нас залишили на такій ноті, що зараз взагалі без поняття, як розплутають увесь цей заміс і чим усе закінчиться. Інтригу тримаю…
❤5custom 58322601470737807522custom 52539008130671017731
Дивлюся на тих, хто йде спати після відбою, збираючись на роботу Як ви? Всі пережили цей жах?
😢5🤝3🥴2
Я, звісно, фанат черепашок ніндзя. Але ж не на стільки 😱 Так, це реальні труни. Задизайнені під чотирьох черепах. У мене немає слів. До речі, замовлення уже були... Якось аж не хочеться у вас питати, яка ваша улюблена черераха П.С. фотки вкрав у "Датабот"
😁10🤡1custom 52539008130671017731
Чекаю «Абсолютно новий день», бо вірю в повернення легендарного героя Нікому не секрет, шо я люблю людину павука, але теж всім відомо, що практично всі фільми повʼязані з цим героєм, скажім, не дуже якісні. Здебільшого це щось інфантильне та підліткове, а хочеться дорослого і справжнього героя. Як це зробив Тобі більше 20 років тому І от зараз, я розумію, що Голланд може. Він уже дорослий, пройшов довгий шлях і ви…
❤6🌚2custom 52829991606629260971
Залишу це тут. Бо можу і бо вони круті Будете дивитися пʼяту частину? Ті хто вже подивився кажуть, що вони знову задрали планку
❤5custom 52377597031984740722custom 52831870182374849682
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @bloopers_ua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“БЛУПЕРС - про кіно і не тільки” (@bloopers_ua), 369 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bloopers_ua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.