Channel
@blueluffu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
355subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001678210148 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blueluffu |
| Created | 27 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blueluffu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 355 | +27 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 328 | +7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 321 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:10 | 315 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 314 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 314 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
189 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 28.6% | |
| 🍓 | 43 | 22.8% | |
| custom 5465357240053542396 | 26 | 13.8% | |
| 💘 | 22 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5328261660626921821 | 17 | 8.99% | |
| 🍌 | 16 | 8.47% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 4.76% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.06% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Немного всякого, чтобы не забывали про моё существование! ✨ Скетч с древней лотереи, про который я абсолютно забыла по какой-то причине ааа ужасно просто 😭😭😭😭😭(если я вдруууг забываю отдать вам что-то, то не стесняйтесь мне писать 😭😭🙏🙏конечно, я стараюсь все помнить, но, видимо, иногда меня может переглючить🥹) Плюс части випок коммишкииии: кусочки фонов и шакальные картошки. Смешные. Вроде.
❤11🍌2🐳2🍓1custom 53282616606269218211
Забыла ответить на анонимку! Привет-привет! У меня соц опрос. Как вы относитесь к людям, которые берут какую-то изюминку с других персонажей своему? Особую форму рогов, особенность конечностей и так далее. Практиковали ли подобное когда-нибудь? Привет! В целом, если как-то эту изюминку адаптировать под себя, немного поменять, чтобы не копировать точь-в-точь, вдохновиться ею, то, наверное, ничего? Наверное, это лучш…
custom 546535724005354239611
В общем было круто, но чутчут неловко АХВХ😭😭😭мне нельзя выходить в социум Картинки когда-то будут, честное слово 😞😞
💘11❤4🍓3🍌1
ААА жесть сходила я на сходку моей любимой Подушки!!! И заодно встретилась с замечательными моими инстаграмными бро Бурогривкой и Инсомнией :3 Делюсь репортажем 1) Картинка для Подухи, подарила ее ей ура ура Простите за тапок на полу АХВХХА 😍😍😍 2) КОТОВОИТЕЛЬСКИЙ КОВЕР-ПЛЕД ОФИГЕТЬ 3) Буро распечатала картинки из моего старого рефа для нее и сделала себе бейджик (?) и не только его?? 😭😭 4) Мыы радостные на месте (в ц…
❤11custom 54653572400535423968custom 53282616606269218214💘2🍌1🍓1
Ой, кстати, кто-то тут идёт на сходку Подухи (GrayPillow) в эту пятницу в Москве? 👉👈 Если кто хочет, можем пересечься там хихи ;] 💞
🍌8🍓2💘1
Нас тут (опять) 300!! Спасибо вам большое <3 Давайте представим, что это картинка не была нарисована несколько месяцев назад в твиттер на 100 подписчиков хдд
🍓21custom 532826166062692182112🍌4❤2❤🔥1💘1
Чутчут анимированную версию с Юмичкой отдельно скидываю!!
❤🔥8🍓5❤2💘1
ААА МЕНЯ АТАКОВАЛА ФЕЗЯЯ КАКАЯ КРАСОТА СПАСИБО БОЛЬШОЕ!!! 😭😭😭💞💞
🍓5💘3
Коммишка :] Забавно, но это снова снежный барс! X)) #арт
❤24custom 54653572400535423967🍓5💘3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @blueluffu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“bluwifu | Синя Блуви! |” (@blueluffu), 355 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blueluffu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.