Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BlumenSeele 18+

Channel

BlumenSeele 18+

@blumenseelee

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,415subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002014665573
TypeChannel
Username@blumenseelee
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/blumenseelee

Growth

1,4121,4231,417.56 August 2026 — 1,422 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,422 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,423 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,420 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,418 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,413 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,412 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,414 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,415 subscribers1,4156 August 202631 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 25 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,410–1,425 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 23:591,415+1
28 Aug 2026, 16:231,414+2
22 Aug 2026, 20:181,412-1
19 Aug 2026, 16:221,413-5
16 Aug 2026, 08:131,418-2
12 Aug 2026, 21:571,420-3
9 Aug 2026, 19:041,423+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:221,422no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:491,422first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,042 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
66463.7%
🔥21820.9%
🍓706.72%
🎉383.65%
❤‍🔥222.11%
👀121.15%
😱60.576%
👍50.48%
🌚20.192%
🌭20.192%
🥰20.192%
😭10.096%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,042 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blumenseelee. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 00:36 UTC420 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Новая атака от Fragonia 🔺Аккаунт на ФА Пасиба))📱 Редко захожу в тг и все время забываю выложить Скоро раб ота закончится, и я выдохну

35🔥2

26 Jul 2026, 03:15 UTC815 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Нам все-таки разрешили постить кусочки)) Вот тут я зависаю 6 дней в неделю Успела прорезать 2 ногтя и все руки убить, заболеть в первую же неделю, и тусить там с темпой 38.5 Честно говоря, настолько заебываюсь, что после работы чисто откисаю, а в вс отсыпаюсь на неделю вперед За 1.5 недели сделано 55,5 сегментов

24🔥5

16 Jul 2026, 11:59 UTC918 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Бэлляяя Не, ну это крит 🚬

🔥8

16 Jul 2026, 11:59 UTC966 views50 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @jackyspitPhoto

Бэмс, еще огонь по своим Ща походу опять меня по работе въебут, не теряйте

39🔥11

15 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC966 views71 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Скетч? Цветной для нового заказчика 🤩 Я сейчас на раб оту вышла, немного в ахуе Но в свободное время могу рисовать картиночки

58🔥13

13 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC≈1,080 views95 reactions10 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Гатоу В-)

70❤‍🔥20🔥5

12 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTC≈1,530 views65 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вторая атака на OSUTSO 👍 Быстро штука, хз, как там критерии выставлять Но сделалось оно за часа 4-5

54👀11

11 Jul 2026, 16:58 UTC918 views74 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Моя первая и ответная атака на DumDog 👉👈

55🔥19

10 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC≈1,020 views59 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ищо одна атака Спасибааа, это очин крута 🐾 Тоже сейчас потихоньку делаю штуки для артфайта 🔺ФА художника 🔺Ссыль на артфайт

🎉3811🔥10

10 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC855 views89 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Бля, это будет кайфова

🔥6128

7 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,150 views69 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Меня атаковали 😪 Это ахуенно, спасибо большое)) 🔺ФА художника 🔺Акк на артфайте

51🔥16🌭2

2 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,380 views55 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://artfight.net/~BlumenSeele Ладна, я тут впервые

41🔥14

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @blumenseelee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BlumenSeele 18+” (@blumenseelee), 1,415 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blumenseelee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.