Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Тупой нож

Channel

Тупой нож

@bluntmedia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,480subscribers

-79 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001147265694
TypeChannel
Username@bluntmedia
Created26 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bluntmedia

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,48012,55912,519.55 August 2026 — 12,559 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,559 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,558 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,555 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,552 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,549 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,545 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,540 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,537 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,540 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,538 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,533 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,524 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,522 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,517 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,515 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,516 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,510 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,507 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,502 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,501 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,496 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,495 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,494 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,492 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,491 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,488 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,480 subscribers5 August 20265 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 31 days, net -79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,468–12,571 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 10:5512,480-8
3 Sept 2026, 14:5912,488-3
2 Sept 2026, 05:3412,491-1
1 Sept 2026, 08:0512,492-2
31 Aug 2026, 10:1512,494-1
30 Aug 2026, 07:1712,495-1
28 Aug 2026, 05:3812,496-5
27 Aug 2026, 05:0812,501-1
26 Aug 2026, 04:4212,502-5
25 Aug 2026, 06:5212,507-3
24 Aug 2026, 07:2312,510-6
22 Aug 2026, 16:1912,516+1
21 Aug 2026, 03:4212,515-2
20 Aug 2026, 01:3612,517-5
19 Aug 2026, 01:0612,522-2
18 Aug 2026, 01:3312,524-9
16 Aug 2026, 22:1512,533-5
15 Aug 2026, 16:5812,538-2
14 Aug 2026, 06:1612,540+3
12 Aug 2026, 19:3312,537first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 12,480 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,410
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held32 (27 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total29,673
Reactions total569
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

908 reactions across 30 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33036.3%
😁23926.3%
👍10711.8%
🔥10011.0%
🗿384.19%
😱232.53%
💔181.98%
👎141.54%
😍131.43%
😢111.21%
🤩101.10%
🙏30.33%
👌20.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 963 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 15:05 UTC468 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Жители Колорадо выбрали самого толстого сурка Победителем стал — за него проголосовали и зоологи, и народ — сурок Рассвет (Dawn). Сколько же он весит? Зачем нужен конкурс? Рассказали в ЖЖ @bluntknife ⚖️

11😁6👌1

31 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC625 views34 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @knifemediaPhoto

На этой понедельничной ноте провожаем лето. Не расстраивайтесь, оно ещё вернется. А чтобы переходить на осенний режим было легче, наслаждайтесь подборкой фирменных мемов от редакции «Ножа». #Острота в Max

16😁11🔥6👍1

29 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC≈1,270 views29 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

На Тайване мужчина следил за женой через робот-пылесос Гаджет с видеокамерой застал супругу за изменой. В результате пострадали все: сам ревнивец попал под стражу, а его жена и её любовник выплатили компенсацию. Современные драматурги, история для вас! @bluntknife 💔

😁14💔131🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC≈1,530 views30 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Китайские инженеры изобрели робот-унитаз — он сам подъезжает к владельцу На что ещё он способен? Читайте в нашем ЖЖ. @bluntknife 🚽

😁16👍6🔥53

25 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,380 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @knifemediaPhoto

Наступающую осень приятнее встречать с новой книгой. А чтобы на это была мотивация и средства, решили разыграть сертификат на 3000 рублей вместе с книжным магазином «Чехов и Компания» на Таганке. Условия просты: 1. Подписаться на на журнал «Нож»; 2. Подписаться на «Чехов и Компания»; 3. Поставить реакцию на этот пост; 4. Нажать кнопку «Участвую». Через неделю выберем счастливчика, на полке которого появятся новые

👍75😁4😍2

25 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,240 views34 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Российский парашютист прыгнул с высоты 11,5 км и установил мировой рекорд Сергей Бойцов летел вниз 7 минут 19 секунд, разгоняясь до скорости 501 км/ч. К счастью, на высоте 1,5 км купол парашюта раскрылся, и спортсмен спокойно приземлился где-то на алтайской земле. ❤️, если приземлились на диван. @bluntknife 🪂

26🔥5😁2🗿1

24 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC≈1,170 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @knifemediaPhoto

Помогите «Ножу» стать ещё острее. Мы хотим узнать вас поближе, чтобы сделать журнал лучше и вернуться с новыми идеями. Пройдите пятиминутный опрос о ваших предпочтениях — все ответы строго анонимные.

7👍2🔥2

24 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC≈1,030 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @knifemediaPhoto

Вся жизнь — игра, а мы в ней — собиратели мемов. Оцените новую подборку смешных картинок, которые накопились у редакции «Ножа» за неделю. Надеемся, она поднимет вам настроение в это утро понедельника. #Острота в Max

😁158🔥7👌1🗿1

22 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC≈1,480 views15 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Video

Голландец разогнал башмак до рекордной скорости Клаас ван Круистум залез в машину-сабо и проехался на ней со скоростью 112,5 километров в час. @bluntknife 🏃

8🔥3😁3👍1

20 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,690 views23 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Учёные объяснили, почему спутник Марса похож на картофелину По их данным, когда-то в Деймос врезался астероид — так он превратился в космический клубень. Хорошо, что не в пюре. @bluntknife 🥔

😁16🔥52

19 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈1,780 views17 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Померанский шпиц Твинки побила один экстраординарный рекорд Чем же так хороша эта малышка? Разгадка — в нашем ЖЖ. @bluntknife 😈

9😁4👍3😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @bluntmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Журнал НОЖ
@knifemedia · 101,812
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тупой нож” (@bluntmedia), 12,480 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bluntmedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.