Жители Колорадо выбрали самого толстого сурка Победителем стал — за него проголосовали и зоологи, и народ — сурок Рассвет (Dawn). Сколько же он весит? Зачем нужен конкурс? Рассказали в ЖЖ @bluntknife ⚖️
❤11😁6👌1

Channel
@bluntmedia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,480subscribers
-79 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001147265694 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bluntmedia |
| Created | 26 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bluntmedia |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:55 | 12,480 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 12,488 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:34 | 12,491 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:05 | 12,492 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 12,494 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 12,495 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 12,496 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 12,501 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 12,502 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 12,507 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 12,510 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:19 | 12,516 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 12,515 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 12,517 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 12,522 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 12,524 | -9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 12,533 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 12,538 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 12,540 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 12,537 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (27 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 29,673 |
| Reactions total | 569 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 21:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
908 reactions across 30 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 330 | 36.3% | |
| 😁 | 239 | 26.3% | |
| 👍 | 107 | 11.8% | |
| 🔥 | 100 | 11.0% | |
| 🗿 | 38 | 4.19% | |
| 😱 | 23 | 2.53% | |
| 💔 | 18 | 1.98% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 1.54% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 1.43% | |
| 😢 | 11 | 1.21% | |
| 🤩 | 10 | 1.10% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.33% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 963 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Жители Колорадо выбрали самого толстого сурка Победителем стал — за него проголосовали и зоологи, и народ — сурок Рассвет (Dawn). Сколько же он весит? Зачем нужен конкурс? Рассказали в ЖЖ @bluntknife ⚖️
❤11😁6👌1
На этой понедельничной ноте провожаем лето. Не расстраивайтесь, оно ещё вернется. А чтобы переходить на осенний режим было легче, наслаждайтесь подборкой фирменных мемов от редакции «Ножа». #Острота в Max
❤16😁11🔥6👍1
На Тайване мужчина следил за женой через робот-пылесос Гаджет с видеокамерой застал супругу за изменой. В результате пострадали все: сам ревнивец попал под стражу, а его жена и её любовник выплатили компенсацию. Современные драматурги, история для вас! @bluntknife 💔
😁14💔13❤1🔥1
Китайские инженеры изобрели робот-унитаз — он сам подъезжает к владельцу На что ещё он способен? Читайте в нашем ЖЖ. @bluntknife 🚽
😁16👍6🔥5❤3
Не всё ж тупеть
😁6
Наступающую осень приятнее встречать с новой книгой. А чтобы на это была мотивация и средства, решили разыграть сертификат на 3000 рублей вместе с книжным магазином «Чехов и Компания» на Таганке. Условия просты: 1. Подписаться на на журнал «Нож»; 2. Подписаться на «Чехов и Компания»; 3. Поставить реакцию на этот пост; 4. Нажать кнопку «Участвую». Через неделю выберем счастливчика, на полке которого появятся новые …
👍7❤5😁4😍2
Российский парашютист прыгнул с высоты 11,5 км и установил мировой рекорд Сергей Бойцов летел вниз 7 минут 19 секунд, разгоняясь до скорости 501 км/ч. К счастью, на высоте 1,5 км купол парашюта раскрылся, и спортсмен спокойно приземлился где-то на алтайской земле. ❤️, если приземлились на диван. @bluntknife 🪂
❤26🔥5😁2🗿1
Помогите «Ножу» стать ещё острее. Мы хотим узнать вас поближе, чтобы сделать журнал лучше и вернуться с новыми идеями. Пройдите пятиминутный опрос о ваших предпочтениях — все ответы строго анонимные.
❤7👍2🔥2
Вся жизнь — игра, а мы в ней — собиратели мемов. Оцените новую подборку смешных картинок, которые накопились у редакции «Ножа» за неделю. Надеемся, она поднимет вам настроение в это утро понедельника. #Острота в Max
😁15❤8🔥7👌1🗿1
Голландец разогнал башмак до рекордной скорости Клаас ван Круистум залез в машину-сабо и проехался на ней со скоростью 112,5 километров в час. @bluntknife 🏃
❤8🔥3😁3👍1
Учёные объяснили, почему спутник Марса похож на картофелину По их данным, когда-то в Деймос врезался астероид — так он превратился в космический клубень. Хорошо, что не в пюре. @bluntknife 🥔
😁16🔥5❤2
Померанский шпиц Твинки побила один экстраординарный рекорд Чем же так хороша эта малышка? Разгадка — в нашем ЖЖ. @bluntknife 😈
❤9😁4👍3😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @bluntmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тупой нож” (@bluntmedia), 12,480 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bluntmedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.