Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for блютузник | 18+ 🌘

Channel

блютузник | 18+ 🌘

@bluuuuesis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,785subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001853773397
TypeChannel
Username@bluuuuesis
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bluuuuesis

Growth

1,7851,8071,7967 August 2026 — 1,801 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,801 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,807 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,804 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,803 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,802 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,795 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,792 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,791 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,785 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 29 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,782–1,810 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 09:181,785-6
1 Sept 2026, 10:171,791-1
29 Aug 2026, 08:051,792-3
26 Aug 2026, 04:541,795-7
23 Aug 2026, 15:061,802-1
20 Aug 2026, 04:431,803-1
14 Aug 2026, 06:151,804-3
11 Aug 2026, 01:211,807+6
7 Aug 2026, 19:591,801no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:171,801first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
58s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,600 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥1,25248.2%
💋34413.2%
💘33412.8%
🍓30211.6%
🔥2288.77%
custom 5249402818372073313662.54%
custom 5249063524545626648441.69%
🌚80.308%
💅50.192%
🙏50.192%
👀30.115%
😍30.115%
🥰30.115%
😁20.077%
💯10.038%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,600 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 16 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bluuuuesis. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC471 views154 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#alnst

❤‍🔥98🔥25custom 524940281837207331318💋6🍓5💘2

4 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC554 views139 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

что еще публиковать как не лысых фэнцинов #спидпейнты

❤‍🔥85custom 524906352454562664823custom 524940281837207331316💘9🍓3💋3

3 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC598 views115 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zukozinePhoto

Несравненная bluuuuesis!🧡 ──────── • ✤ • ──────── ТГ: блютузник | 18+ #zukozine #zukozine_info

❤‍🔥77💘20custom 52494028183720733139🍓7🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC721 views239 reactions13 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💋133❤‍🔥54🔥26💘8custom 52490635245456266486🍓4custom 52494028183720733134💅3

2 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC690 views140 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я приболела чуть чуть ковыляю анимацию, но навряд-ли я её буду раскрашивать, это чтобы посмотреть как они тьмокаются

💋85❤‍🔥28🍓15💘9🌚3

1 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC790 views240 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

дай бог вам здоровья

❤‍🔥150💋32🔥28💘15custom 52490635245456266484custom 52494028183720733134🍓3🥰3

31 Jul 2026, 19:16 UTC942 views296 reactions11 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

И вторая иллюстрация 🙂‍↕️🙌💗

❤‍🔥202🔥40💋31🍓7💘4👀3custom 52490635245456266483😍2

31 Jul 2026, 19:16 UTC876 views244 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кусочек моего Зина❤️💗

❤‍🔥167🔥36💋24💘7🍓3🌚2💅2custom 52494028183720733132

30 Jul 2026, 22:44 UTC920 views199 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

жара и комары не дают мне спать....

❤‍🔥127🍓37🔥26💘5custom 52490635245456266484

30 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC881 views188 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

идиоты

💘105❤‍🔥41💋24custom 52494028183720733136🍓4custom 52490635245456266484🔥2😁2

30 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC803 views72 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Часто любила рисовать красный макияж на персонажах, что иногда так красилась. А еще линии такие вылизанные, все должно было быть красиво, поэтому я очень долго концетрировалась на лайне. В итоге я перешла беспорядочному подходу💻

❤‍🔥51💘11🍓7🔥3

29 Jul 2026, 22:03 UTC876 views96 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пока временно ставлю эту штуку, потому что мне написывают мошенники. Если что, есть анонимка. На те вопросы которые уже есть в группе, я отвечать повторно не буду 🙂‍↔️❣️

❤‍🔥60💘21🍓15

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @bluuuuesis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“блютузник | 18+ 🌘” (@bluuuuesis), 1,785 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bluuuuesis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.