Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Боря программирует

Channel

Боря программирует

@bminaiev_blog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,029subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001596955442
TypeChannel
Username@bminaiev_blog
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bminaiev_blog

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,0297,0507,039.56 August 2026 — 7,045 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,045 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,043 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,046 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,050 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,042 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,038 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,035 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,033 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,032 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,031 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,036 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,029 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,026–7,053 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 00:207,029-7
13 Sept 2026, 07:597,036+5
9 Sept 2026, 10:167,031-1
4 Sept 2026, 04:177,032-1
31 Aug 2026, 22:087,033-2
26 Aug 2026, 11:437,035-3
23 Aug 2026, 05:447,038-4
19 Aug 2026, 10:167,042-8
16 Aug 2026, 17:377,050+4
13 Aug 2026, 06:257,046+3
10 Aug 2026, 05:217,043-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:457,045no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:337,045first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,760 reactions across 20 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥62035.2%
53530.4%
👍30717.4%
🎉724.09%
🤯543.07%
🥰301.70%
🤔281.59%
😁191.08%
😍170.966%
😭110.625%
🎄80.455%
🤡70.398%
60.341%
🎃50.284%
🤪50.284%
👀40.227%
😱40.227%
30.17%
❤‍🔥30.17%
👏30.17%
11 further kinds191.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,760 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 07:30 UTC≈3,160 views44 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Решение второй части задачи К: https://t.me/pushing_buttons/95 Главное не испугаться линейной алгебры вначале поста и дочитать до красивых картинок.

👍28🔥133

21 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC≈4,340 views83 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Поздравляю Дениса с тем, что он первый решил обе части задачи К! Про решение первой части он написал в своем канале https://t.me/pushing_buttons/94 Подписывайтесь, чтобы прочитать и про вторую часть тоже!

🔥749

17 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈29,100 views61 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Midnight Code Cup 2026 Finals Давно ничего не писал — надо исправляться. Недавно в Белграде прошёл финал 24-часового соревнования Midnight Code Cup, в организации которого я участвовал. На соревновании мы разрешаем пользоваться AI, поэтому в этом году пришлось постараться, чтобы задачи не решались одним промптом. Условия можно почитать здесь: https://2026.midnightcodecup.org/problems/ Для некоторых задач открыто до

🥰2916🔥12👍2🏆1🤔1

12 Apr 2026, 11:28 UTC≈10,000 views78 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Midnight Code Cup 2026 Qualification Round. Results. Прошел квалификационный раунд, интересные ощущения от него. Вот тут можно почитать задачи: https://codeforces.com/gym/106478 Вот тут посмотреть финальные результаты: https://ranker.codeforces.com/ranklist/106471 Мы в этих контестах разрешаем пользоваться AI, и очень интересно наблюдать, насколько быстро все меняется. В финале прошлого года (который был летом) ко

🔥47👍168🤪5🦄2

9 Apr 2026, 18:48 UTC≈7,500 views46 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Midnight Code Cup 2026 Qualification Round Уже в эту субботу пройдет квалификационный раунд Midnight Code Cup! Сегодня последний шанс зарегистрироваться на раунд, так что если вы все еще это не сделали — самое время! Если вы вдруг не знаете, что такое Midnight Code Cup, то это контест с финалом в Белграде, который будет длиться 24 часа (а квалификация всего 4 часа). Мы стараемся придумывать интересные необычные зад

👍299🔥5🎃3

24 Mar 2026, 20:06 UTC≈9,570 views92 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Parameter Golf Мы (OpenAI) недавно запустили контест, в котором нужно натренировать как можно более хорошую модель фиксированного размера (не больше 16МБ) на фиксированном датасете. Лидерборд (и код сабмитов) публичный, поэтому уже можно посмотреть какие типы оптимизаций помогают, и что примерно можно еще попробовать. Размеры всего достаточно маленькие, так что для экспериментов не нужно слишком много ресурсов, но

👍54🔥2711

15 Feb 2026, 16:32 UTC≈9,960 views47 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Чтение мыслей Тестировал сегодня новую модель. В качестве теста ей нужно было угадать случайную последовательность из десяти букв пользуясь некоторыми подсказками. К сожалению, в генерации подсказок я немного набагал, и единственная подсказка, которую получила модель, была "вторая буква из десяти это y" (по-английски). Мои баги ее не сильно волновали, поэтому она немного подумала, и выдала правильный результат. Как

🤔219🤡7🤯7👀3

31 Dec 2025, 19:38 UTC≈11,900 views255 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Вместо итогов 2025 года тут будет кот! С новым годом!

154🎉63😍17🎄8👍63🎅2🌚1

22 Dec 2025, 11:38 UTC≈11,800 views49 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Чем заняться первого января? Если у вас все еще нет планов на первое января, то очень рекомендую поучаствовать в контесте от Андрея — https://t.me/andgein_notes/192! Это не обычный контест типа CodeForces или ICPC, тут можно пользоваться LLM и задачи довольно нестандартные. Вот тут можно почитать задачи прошлого года с решениями: https://2025.andgein.ru/about-tasks. Я участвовал в прошлом году (даже выиграл 🥇), мне

26😁9🔥7👍4❤‍🔥3

10 Oct 2025, 17:07 UTC≈11,900 views100 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Красивые детальные статьи Выходные это отличное время, чтобы потратить пару часов на то, чтобы прочитать какую-нибудь очень детальную статью и подробно в чем-то разобраться. По этому поводу хочу поделиться несколькими качественными длинными постами. 1. https://www.aleksagordic.com/blog/matmul — очень подробно про перемножение матриц на GPU. Что-то в стиле "What Every Programmer Should Know About Memory", только про

🔥6521👍11🤔2🗿1

30 Sept 2025, 18:47 UTC≈9,140 views80 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Дерево Фенвика Дерево Фенвика это структура данных, которая позволяет быстро обрабатывать две операции: - a[pos] += x - посчитать сумму a[i] для i <= r. Вместо массива a будем поддерживать некоторый массив f. Сами функции выглядят так: void add(int pos, int x) { for (int i = pos; i < n; i = up(i)) { f[i] += x; } } int sum(int pos) { int res = 0; for (int i = pos; i >= 0; i = down(i)) { res += f[i];

43🔥17👍11👏3🤯3👀1👎1😁1

18 Sept 2025, 17:01 UTC≈13,100 views200 reactionsread 20 August 2026

ICPC is solved Вчеры мы рассказали как AI от OpenAI поучаствовал в финале ICPC. Он смог решить все задачи — больше чем любая другая команда. Это очень крутой результат! Единственный раз в истории ICPC, когда команда решила все задачи во время финала, был 10 лет назад (и в этой команде был я). За последние несколько месяцев мы поучаствовали в разных соревнованиях и везде добились хороших результатов. Первое место на

104🔥71😭11👍5😁4🤩3🎃2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bminaiev_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Jul 2025, 16:40 UTCAnonymous Poll1,230 voters approx.

Какое место займет AI на AtCoder World Tour Finals 2025 (heuristic)?

  1. 119%
  2. 2-329%
  3. 4-626%
  4. 7-1326%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2025 to 22 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Боря программирует” (@bminaiev_blog), 7,029 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bminaiev_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.