Sziget Festival 2026
❤172❤🔥38🔥27👍5😍5🌭1👾1💊1

Channel
@bmthofficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,551subscribers
-56 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001130696422 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bmthofficial |
| Created | 22 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bmthofficial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 10,551 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 10,552 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:55 | 10,554 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:34 | 10,555 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 10,559 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 10,561 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 10,564 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 10,565 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 10,566 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 10,561 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 10,563 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 10,562 | +7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 10,555 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 10,552 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 10,554 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 10,553 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 10,559 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 10,569 | -7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 10,576 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 10,578 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (10 July 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 24,390 |
| Reactions total | 1,085 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,456 reactions across 15 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,193 | 34.5% | |
| 🔥 | 1,114 | 32.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 303 | 8.77% | |
| 🏆 | 163 | 4.72% | |
| 🤯 | 147 | 4.25% | |
| 😈 | 138 | 3.99% | |
| ⚡ | 107 | 3.10% | |
| 👍 | 79 | 2.29% | |
| 😱 | 64 | 1.85% | |
| 😭 | 26 | 0.752% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 0.55% | |
| 🤣 | 17 | 0.492% | |
| 💊 | 12 | 0.347% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 0.347% | |
| 😍 | 12 | 0.347% | |
| 👀 | 8 | 0.231% | |
| 🦄 | 8 | 0.231% | |
| 🌭 | 6 | 0.174% | |
| 👻 | 6 | 0.174% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 0.145% | |
| 7 further kinds | 17 | 0.492% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,456 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sziget Festival 2026
❤172❤🔥38🔥27👍5😍5🌭1👾1💊1
Bring Me The Horizon have been working on new music they hope to release soon via new interview with MARVIN. Bring Me The Horizon работают над новой музыкой, которую надеются выпустить в ближайшее время.
🔥202❤42👍26👀8⚡4❤🔥1💯1🥰1
Sziget Festival 2026 🇭🇺 Update Setlist: 1. Dehumanized 2. DArkSide 3. MANTRA 4. Happy Song 5. Teardrops 6. AmEN! 7. Kool-Aid 8. Shadow Moses Itch for the Cure (When Will We Be Free?) 9. Kingslayer 10. Pray for Plagues 11. Follow You 12. Can You Feel My Heart 13. Doomed 14. Drown 15. Throne
🔥123❤25😱15🤯4❤🔥3😈3⚡2🗿2
Oli Sykes × Courtney LaPlante × Valorant Oli Sykes and Courtney LaPlante (Spiritbox) to team up on new theme song "If The Sun Burns Out Tonight" for Riot Games Valorant Champions Tour. The track will be written and produced by DJ Grabbitz. Оли Сайкс и Кортни ЛаПлант (Spiritbox) объединятся для создания новой заглавной песни «If The Sun Burns Out Tonight» для турнира Valorant Champions Tour от Riot Games. Песня вы…
🔥168❤51😱13⚡7❤🔥6👍3💊2😍2
Why the world hated this band | Bring Me The Horizon — YouTube Before becoming one of the biggest metal bands in the world, Bring Me the Horizon pushed past severe criticism and rejection, and in this conversation, they reflect on the moments that nearly broke them, the mindset that kept them going, and the journey that offers aspiring artists a blueprint for building a career on their own terms. Почему весь мир нен…
❤85❤🔥20⚡8👍2💊2🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤302⚡56👍28🔥15🦄7❤🔥4🤗4💊2
Funny fact by Oli «Изначально эта песня должна была называться "wine em dine ‘em 69 em", но Мэт тогда настаивал на варианте "Black & Blue"». wine em dine ‘em 69 em ➜ Black & Blue
❤156❤🔥33😭19👻5🤔5👍4🐳2😁2
20 fckin years
😈135❤65🔥31❤🔥8💯6🙏2
🏆 Bring Me The Horizon set a new record. Bring Me The Horizon’s Count Your Blessings: Repented has officially debuted at No. 6 on the UK Albums Chart, marking the highest-charting deathcore album in history. The newly re-recorded version also sets a new personal best for the band, comfortably surpassing the original Count Your Blessings, which peaked at just No. 96 upon its release in 2006. 🏆 Bring Me The Horizon у…
🏆163❤56🔥25👍3❤🔥1💯1
Video, posted without a caption
❤🔥125❤42😁17🤣15👍4🌭3💯2
COUNT YOUR BLESSINGS - REPENTED SHOW 1 - BEC, JULY 10th FULL SET [4k] Setlist: 1. Pray for Plagues 2. Tell Slater Not to Wash His Dick 3. For Stevie Wonder's Eyes Only (Braille) 4. A Lot Like Vegas 5. Black & Blue 6. Slow Dance 7. Liquor & Love Lost 8. (I Used to Make Out With) Medusa 9. Fifteen Fathoms, Counting 10. Off the Heezay 11. Dehumanized 12. Encore: 13. Suicide Season 14. Re: They Have No Reflections 15. M…
🔥109❤45😱12😍5❤🔥4💊1💔1
Count Your Blessings 20th Anniversary Show 🥵 Setlist: 1. Pray for Plagues 2. Tell Slater Not to Wash His Dick 3. For Stevie Wonder's Eyes Only (Braille) 4. A Lot Like Vegas 5. Black & Blue 6. Slow Dance 7. Liquor & Love Lost 8. (I Used to Make Out With) Medusa 9. Fifteen Fathoms, Counting 10. Off the Heezay 11. Dehumanized 12. Encore: 13. Suicide Season 14. Re: They Have No Reflections 15. Memorial 16. Blessed With …
🤯143❤66🔥30❤🔥13👍2👻1💊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @bmthofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bring Me The Horizon” (@bmthofficial), 10,551 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bmthofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.