Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
2,370 average views per post against 1,901 subscribers — an engagement rate of 124.4%. Across the 1,429 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,161 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 5.22% and 21.7%, with a median of 10.7%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (24 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Posts measured
17 of 17 published in the window (3 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
40,210
Mature posts only
140.9% over 14 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,885–1,903 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 02:00
1,901
+9
14 Sept 2026, 12:41
1,892
+5
13 Sept 2026, 00:22
1,887
no change
12 Sept 2026, 23:47
1,887
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
124.4%
avg views ÷ 1,901 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,370
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
17
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026
Posts held
20 (13 August 2026 – 12 September 2026)
Views total
40,210
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Sept 2026, 00:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
السلام عليكم
اذا أكو طالبات من منطقة السياسين يشكلون خط في فترة الدوام الرسمي
او إذا أكو سائق خط ياخذ طالبات من المنطقة، ياريت تخبروني 🌷
وأيضاً إذا أكو طالبات من السياسيين يريدن يشاركن بخط، حتى يتفقن ويجّن سوه. يا ريت اللي عدهه معلومه تدخل خاص
الطالبات أدناه
شهد محمد فلاح
مريم ميثم مجيد
كوثر علي فليح
حنين احمد كاطع
يرجى بيان عدم رغبتكم باداء الامتحان الخاص غدا ان شاء الله يتم تسليم الأسماء مع المبلغ الى مديرية التربيه عندها يسقط حقكم في تأدية الامتحان
الطالبات المشمولات بالامتحان الشامل الدور الخاص اربع دروس و١٠ قرار
من السادس العلمي
بتول زهراو عوده
زينب علاء شامل
شهد محمد فلاح
علياء ممصطفى علاوي
كوثر علي فليح
مريم محمد علي
نبأ مالك حسن
مريم ميثم َمجيد
من السادس الأدبي
حنين احمد كاطع
فاطمه جميل حميد
الطالبات المشمولات بالدور الخاص من الصف السادس العلمي والادبي وسبق نشرت اسماؤكم الحضور غدا إلى المدرسه لتسجيل اسماؤكم مع مبلغ ٥٠ الف للعلم فقط غدا نكون متواجدين في المدرسه
الطالبات المشمولات بالامتحان الشامل الدور الخاص اربع دروس و١٠ قرار
من السادس العلمي
بتول زهراو عوده
زينب علاء شامل
شهد محمد فلاح
علياء ممصطفى علاوي
كوثر علي فليح
مريم محمد علي
نبأ مالك حسن
مريم ميثم َمجيد
من السادس الأدبي
حنين احمد كاطع
فاطمه جميل حميد
Signed om ahmed zain
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bntalhuda666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تربية محافظة ميسان( علي ابن العماره ) @missan6 · 26,374 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اعدادية بنت الهدى للبنات (ميسان)” (@bntalhuda666), 1,901 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bntalhuda666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
