送10个包赔 金额100-500U 联系我~
❤2🎉1👍1👏1
Signed 奇迹

Channel
@bocaishe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
5,893subscribers
+54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002065199924 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @bocaishe @qijijiaoyi |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 49 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bocaishe |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:19 | 5,893 | +8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:25 | 5,885 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:14 | 5,888 | +6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:19 | 5,882 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:11 | 5,884 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:48 | 5,890 | no change |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:09 | 5,890 | +8 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:55 | 5,882 | +16 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:10 | 5,866 | +17 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:26 | 5,849 | +16 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:39 | 5,833 | +22 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:26 | 5,811 | +13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:36 | 5,798 | +32 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:29 | 5,766 | +9 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 06:28 | 5,757 | -10 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 23:55 | 5,767 | -16 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:29 | 5,783 | -2 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 09:49 | 5,785 | +21 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 08:37 | 5,764 | +17 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 21:00 | 5,747 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (3 July 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,057 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
34 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 38.2% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 32.4% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 8.82% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
送10个包赔 金额100-500U 联系我~
❤2🎉1👍1👏1
Signed 奇迹
@jinfucai 金富电子 每日的流水红包都在这个频道发送 大家记得关注一下
Signed 奇迹
👑 金富游戏|@JFYX 👑 💎 新客首充豪礼 · 最高赠送 3688 🔥 新人专属福利,首充好礼相送! 🎁 多档充值奖励,活动长期有效! 💰 首充福利一览 首充 50 ➜ 赠送 8 首充 100 ➜ 赠送 18 首充 300 ➜ 赠送 58 首充 500 ➜ 赠送 88 首充 1000 ➜ 赠送 158 首充 5000 ➜ 赠送 388 首充 10000 ➜ 赠送 888 首充 50000 ➜ 赠送 1888 首充 100000 ➜ 赠送 3688 ✨ 金富游戏 · 尊享首充礼遇 ✅ 新会员首次充值专享 ✅ PG、PP指定游戏适用 ✅ 活动长期有效 📌 领取规则:首次充值后保持金额不变,主动联系客服申请;本金与彩金合计需完成5倍流水方可下分,具体以活动规则为准。 🎯 金富游戏|首充有礼,精彩由此开启! 🔞 仅限符合当地法律规定的成年人参与,请理性娱乐。
❤1👍1
打德州 你为什么会输钱? 因为你在凭感觉打牌 但德州是个概率游戏~ PS: 金富德州水鱼很多 快来捡鱼 @jfdz
Signed 奇迹
1961年,数学家靠凯利公式横扫赌场 1961年,数学家爱德华·索普带着1000美元进赌场,一个周末赢了2.1万美元。他靠算牌拿到赢面,靠一条公式决定每一把押多少。 这条公式叫凯利公式, 1956年诞生于贝尔实验室。 我用电脑模拟了1000个人玩同一个游戏:抛硬币,六成赢、四成输,每人100块,抛300把。 · 每把梭哈:第1把就没了375人,5把后只剩86人 · 每把押一半:887人输光 · 每把押两成:517人把100块变成了4.2万以上 同样的运气,只差一件事:押多少。放到股市,这叫仓位管理。 PS: 你现在,是几成仓?
👍1🔥1😁1
Signed 奇迹
金富德州 一局百万输赢 兄弟们来观战了 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 金富鱿鱼桌 · 高手集结 50/100/200(50)实力对局 牌桌见真章 · 战绩看实力 实时榜单 · 数据透明 · 高额竞技 正在开局,等你入局!
🔥 博彩社·TG事件 关于 @gaode 高德担保 × @fjqb 飞机钱包合作争议 近日,围绕 @gaode 高德担保、@fjqb 飞机钱包与七天担保 @qtdb 之间的一笔 50万U合作资金,出现多项争议。 据七天方面说法,此前高德主动联系七天,称有一名“大客户”,并提出双方共同出资 50万U 参与项目。 其中: 七天出资:35万U 高德称出资:15万U 然而,合作结束后,双方对于客户身份、充值情况、投注过程、资金来源以及钱包资金路径产生争议。 ⚠️ 争议焦点 七天方面提出,希望核验包括: ① 客户是否真实存在? ② 50万U资金是否全部真实到位? ③ 客户是否真实完成充值? ④ 35万U进入后,完整资金流向是什么? ⑤ 投注记录、开奖记录能否完整对应? ⑥ @fjqb 飞机钱包相关资金路径能否核验? 据七天方面称,其要求提供完整充值记录、资金流水、投注明细、开奖记录及钱包资金路径,但目前其认为获得的材料仍不足
❤1
Signed 奇迹
鱿鱼上线 速来火拼了 金富德州俱乐部 @JFDZ
Signed 奇迹
💚平台通知 平台将于明日,9月24日(周四)早上8点停服更新,预计更新持续2小时30分钟! 06:00起将停止增加新桌,请各位玩家于07:50前离开牌桌,避免造成不必要损失! ⚠️ 请各俱乐部提前通知所属玩家,合理安排牌局。更新完成后将第一时间通知恢复。感谢各俱乐部的理解与配合。 金富德州俱乐部 @JFDZ PS:上线🦑鱿鱼模式,开始抢鱿鱼。激情对战 喜欢鱿鱼模式的 速来
Signed 奇迹
博彩社·今日视频(体验天才交易员的一生)
👍1
Signed 奇迹
夜间局 全是市场大佬♠️ 这一局,等你落座。 ━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🏠 房名:独享长牌VIP桌 10/20/40 🆔 房号:8028797 🔰 盲注:10/20/40 (20) (USDT)
福利来担保更名为法拉利担保
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @bocaishe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@bocaishe edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“博彩社【赌狗日记】” (@bocaishe), 5,893 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bocaishe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.