Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сергей Богатов | Транспортный юрист | Грузоперевозки

Channel

Сергей Богатов | Транспортный юрист | Грузоперевозки

@bogatovgroup

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,435subscribers

-210 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001289709850
TypeChannel
Username@bogatovgroup
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bogatovgroup

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,05711,64511,3517 August 2026 — 11,645 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,615 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,591 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,546 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,514 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,484 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,463 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,414 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,369 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,335 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,309 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,274 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,244 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,219 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,170 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,111 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,086 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,079 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,081 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,078 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,073 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,070 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,066 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,067 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,065 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,057 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,240 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,236 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,441 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,436 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,435 subscribers11,4357 August 202619 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net -210. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,969–11,733 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:3611,435-1
16 Sept 2026, 16:2011,436-5
14 Sept 2026, 19:5911,441+205
11 Sept 2026, 07:5511,236-4
8 Sept 2026, 09:4011,240+183
5 Sept 2026, 03:2111,057-8
3 Sept 2026, 09:5311,065-2
2 Sept 2026, 06:2311,067+1
1 Sept 2026, 07:1511,066-4
30 Aug 2026, 08:2211,070-3
29 Aug 2026, 09:1211,073-5
28 Aug 2026, 05:5611,078-3
27 Aug 2026, 09:1411,081+2
26 Aug 2026, 11:2411,079-7
25 Aug 2026, 10:5211,086-25
24 Aug 2026, 11:2811,111-59
22 Aug 2026, 18:2411,170-49
21 Aug 2026, 10:0711,219-25
20 Aug 2026, 10:1811,244-30
19 Aug 2026, 10:0211,274first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.47%
avg views ÷ 11,435 subscribers
Avg views / post
854
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.553%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held30 (17 June 20262 September 2026)
Views total3,417
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 14s
Average length
4m 14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

239 reactions across 24 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7832.6%
👍7029.3%
6025.1%
💯208.37%
👀41.67%
😱41.67%
🥴31.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 11:46 UTC367 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔥 3 сентября в 11:00 мск Открытая сессия с Фёдором Новиковым. С 1 сентября использование электронных перевозочных документов становится обязательным. Бизнес завалил ФНС вопросами: мы собрали самые актуальные – про НДС, расходы, штрафы и ответственность. 3 сентября на них ответит Фёдор Новиков, начальник Управления электронного документооборота ФНС России. Разберём: 💰 Примут ли расходы и вычет по НДС, если ЭТрН о

👍3🔥31

1 Sept 2026, 12:16 UTC526 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Запись вебинара «Особенности экспедиторской деятельности в «цифре» 25 августа 2026 г. провели бесплатный онлайн-вебинар для транспортно-экспедиционных компаний. 🎥 СМОТРЕТЬ ВИДЕО Спикеры: Сергей Богатов, юрист в сфере автомобильных грузоперевозок, Павел Белов (1001 ГРУЗ) и Антон Шевченко (Контур.Диадок). На вебинаре разобрали не теорию ради теории, а конкретные изменения, которые влияют на работу экспедиторов, пер

25 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈1,550 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Как на самом деле проходит работа с ЭТрН? Не на схеме и не в инструкции, а на конкретной перевозке от начала до конца. В новом видео Сергей Богатов вместе с «Перевозчиком 116» на практике показывает весь документооборот: создание и подписание ЭТрН, действия водителя, замечания при приёмке груза, QR-код для проверки, выгрузку и завершение перевозки. Если вы только готовитесь к работе с ЭТрН, смотрите видео целиком.

4

24 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC974 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

25 августа 2026 в 09:00 по Мск пройдет вебинар «Особенности экспедиторской деятельности в «цифре» Обязательна предварительная регистрация. https://bogatov-group.ru/vebinar/ ✅ Поможем спокойно подготовиться к новым цифровым требованиям На вебинаре разберем не теорию ради теории, а конкретные изменения, которые влияют на работу экспедиторов, перевозчиков и логистических подразделений. Регистрация по ссылке 🔗 https

👍2🔥2💯1

18 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,200 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

25 августа 2026 в 09:00 по Мск пройдет вебинар «Особенности экспедиторской деятельности в «цифре» Обязательна предварительная регистрация. https://bogatov-group.ru/vebinar/ ✅ Поможем спокойно подготовиться к новым цифровым требованиям На вебинаре разберем не теорию ради теории, а конкретные изменения, которые влияют на работу экспедиторов, перевозчиков и логистических подразделений. Регистрация по ссылке 🔗 https

🔥32

17 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC≈1,170 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

С 1 сентября теория закончится и начнётся самое интересное: как всё это будет работать на практике. Какой ID передавать контрагенту? Кто и какой титул должен подписывать? Где искать ЭТрН? Что делать, если документ не пришёл? Как исправлять ошибки? И что делать, когда у двух операторов на один вопрос внезапно три разных ответа? ❗️Для таких практических вопросов коллеги создали чат по ЭПД и ЭТрН в MAX. За первый ден

🥴3🔥2👍1💯1

14 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,070 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

А КАК ЭТрН БУДЕТ РАБОТАТЬ У ЗЕРНОВОЗОВ? После предыдущего поста в комментариях подняли еще один хороший вопрос: как оформлять ЭТрН там, где на погрузке никто не собирается сидеть с ноутбуком и вручную забивать каждую машину? Недавно был на конференции по ЭТрН в Нижнем Новгороде, там показывали одно из решений именно для перевозки зерна. Решение разработала эта компания https://sanador.ru/it Суть довольно интересн

🔥4💯21👀1

12 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,190 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Недавно принял участие в большом разговоре TransRussia Connect о переходе транспортной отрасли на электронные перевозочные документы. Вместе с экспертами разбирались не в теории и не в очередном пересказе закона. Говорили о том, как всё это будет работать в реальном бизнесе. В том числе обсудили: • кто должен заниматься переходом на ЭТрН: перевозчик, грузовладелец или обе стороны; • что сегодня вызывает больше всег

👍21💯1🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC≈3,500 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

🔥🔥🔥 ВАЖНАЯ НОВОСТЬ! ФСБ России дали разъяснения субъектам транспортно-экспедиционной деятельности по реализации отдельных положений Федерального закона от 30 июня 2003 г. № 87-ФЗ «О транспортно-экспедиционной деятельности» и принятых в его исполнение подзаконных актов Читайте, изучайте, будем разбираться! 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Пишите вопросы, мысли, инсайты!

🔥9👍3

10 Aug 2026, 05:07 UTC≈1,240 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

💬 Насколько рынок готов к новым правилам? Поделитесь мнением 2026 год меняет привычные процессы в логистике. С 1 марта заработал реестр экспедиторов, а с 1 сентября электронные перевозочные документы станут обязательными для всех участников перевозки. Команда Умной Логистики проводит исследование, чтобы понять: 🟠Что изменилось в работе компаний после запуска реестра. 🟠На каком этапе подготовки к ЭПД сейчас находи

5

5 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,460 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Щебень, кризис и электронные документы. Что происходит с перевозками? На днях меня попросили прокомментировать ситуацию на рынке перевозок щебня для отраслевого материала, где своим мнением также поделились представители крупных производителей, логистов и аналитики рынка. Если коротко, то практически все эксперты сходятся в одном: • спрос на щебень падает; • строительная отрасль испытывает серьезные финансовые сло

👍42

29 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Что будете делать, если заказчик попросит ЭТрН уже завтра? Представьте ситуацию. Вам звонит постоянный клиент. Говорит: "С понедельника работаем только через электронную транспортную накладную." Что будете делать? Искать сервис? Срочно звонить программисту? Просить отсрочку? Или отказаться от перевозки? 70% ответивших скорее вопрос к вам)) Самое неприятное в ЭТрН даже не сами документы. Самое неприятное, что кру

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @bogatovgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTCAnonymous Poll236 voters

Вы уже начали готовиться к работе с ЭТрН?

  1. Уже внедряем36%
  2. Пока только изучаем34%
  3. Даже не начали20%
  4. Не понимаю, с чего начать15%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Михаил Белоусов
@academylogistic · 40,220
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 31 August 2026
ATI.SU | Логистическая платформа: грузоперевозки и автоматизация
@birzha_atisu · 22,337
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 September 2026
Дальнобойщики
@truckers_club · 24,614
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 15 September 2026
Логистика 2.0
@logistica_2_0 · 61,189
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сергей Богатов | Транспортный юрист | Грузоперевозки” (@bogatovgroup), 11,435 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bogatovgroup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.