Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for леша сергеев

Channel

леша сергеев

@bokuwalesha

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

748subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001555274071
TypeChannel
Username@bokuwalesha
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bokuwalesha

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

748761754.57 August 2026 — 760 subscribers7 August 2026 — 760 subscribers7 August 2026 — 761 subscribers14 August 2026 — 753 subscribers21 August 2026 — 751 subscribers27 August 2026 — 752 subscribers3 September 2026 — 748 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 27 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 746–763 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 13:21748-4
27 Aug 2026, 23:28752+1
21 Aug 2026, 03:07751-2
14 Aug 2026, 22:26753-8
7 Aug 2026, 20:57761+1
7 Aug 2026, 01:46760no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:33760first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

405 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤27267.2%
custom 5319214110154432904389.38%
custom 5447358561124361156317.65%
🔥266.42%
🕊215.19%
💔163.95%
custom 522912776812131612410.247%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 405 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bokuwalesha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 May 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC275 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

я короче глянул «одиссею». пока могу сказать одно — рыдал завтра постараюсь накидать пост.

❤20🕊8💔1

31 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC309 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

псс, там вышел новый видос от меня 📺 Что происходит с «Ледниковым периодом»

❤12

10 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC577 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

тот факт, что я смеялся во время просмотра «картин дружеских связях» и плакал после, говорит обо мне больше, чем любой другой пост в этом канале не могу перестать думать об этом фильме. прекрасный и чувственный дебют, который вроде о прошлом, вроде о будущем, но при этом о каком-то неподвижном и вязком течении времени так или иначе, посмотрел я этот фильм в самый подходящий для этого период моей жизни

❤17🕊6

8 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC530 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

глянул первую серию нового «Призрака в доспехах», и мне очень даже понравилось я не фанат фильма, который выходил в 1995 году, хоть и считаю его великим. поэтому меня никак не беспокоит, что новое аниме очень сильно отличается по тону и настроению как я понял, эта экранизация старается быть ближе к оригинальной манге. и после просмотра всего одной серии мне даже захотелось почитать «Призрака в доспехах» пока что я…

❤10custom 54473585611243611564🔥3

2 Jul 2026, 11:39 UTC540 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

лежу в больнице после операции, а вам предлагаю посмотреть мое новое видео про «Историю игрушек 5»! 📺 ИСТОРИЯ ИГРУШЕК 5 — Шаг назад для Pixar?

❤23

21 Jun 2026, 11:36 UTC713 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

хочу с вами немного поговорить о моем youtube-канале если коротко — я не знаю, как мне дальше быть сразу после релиза эссе про «Идеальные дни», я сел за ролик про Джима Джармуша. несколько раз даже писал о моем прогрессе в тг-канал. и прогресс правда был — я провел ресерч, продумал структуру и в итоге написал сценарий. вот только мне он не понравился возможно, для кого-то он более чем нормальный, но мой внутренний…

❤21💔13custom 54473585611243611562

18 Jun 2026, 14:52 UTC515 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Закулисье реальности» особенно интересное для меня кино, и на то есть одна причина — смешение киношной эстетики с игровой одно дело смотреть на лиминальные пространства и объекты, которые проваливаются через текстуры, когда это игры или видосы для ютуба, но совсем другое — увидеть это всё на большом экране кинотеатра «Закулисье реальности» стоит вашего внимания как минимум из-за дизайна локаций и атмосферы, котору…

❤9custom 54473585611243611565custom 53192141101544329044🔥1

16 Jun 2026, 12:40 UTC481 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

выпустил новое видео! 📺 Как взрослая анимация захватила мир [история adult swim]

❤7🔥6

12 Jun 2026, 13:17 UTC642 views22 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

внимание, у КККК вышел ролик про Питера Джексона! я помогал с монтажом, да и сама история получилась очень крутой. буду рад, если посмотрите 📺Как «Хоббит» сломал карьеру Питера Джексона

❤14🔥4🕊2custom 53192141101544329042

9 Jun 2026, 10:14 UTC690 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Обсессия» — угарный хоррор с предсказуемыми пугалками идти в кино рекомендую либо с друзьями, либо в очень заполненный зал. иначе рискуете кринжевать с происходящего на экране вместо того, чтобы хохотать вместе с толпой людей лично меня во время просмотра преследовало три мысли: • фильм пропитан эстетикой западного ютуба, которая в свою очередь пытается сейчас смешать особенности вертикальных форматов с «киношной…

❤26custom 53192141101544329044custom 52291277681213161241

8 Jun 2026, 08:55 UTC525 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

о чем пишу пост для начала?

  1. «закулисье реальности»48%
  2. «обсессия»52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 May 2026, 10:50 UTC798 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

меня направили в больницу из-за травмы и тут вайб «Больницы Питт»… до этого бы максимум в поликлиниках, причем только в Норильске. так что какая-то огромная московская больница с кучей врачей меня искренне удивляет

❤22🕊5💔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @bokuwalesha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Jun 2026, 08:55 UTCFinal Results77 voters

о чем пишу пост для начала?

  1. «закулисье реальности»48%
  2. «обсессия»52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“леша сергеев” (@bokuwalesha), 748 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bokuwalesha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.