Use these domains: shreewin22.com shreewin44.com shreewin41.com shreewin29.com shreewin10.com https://www.shreewin44.com/#/register?invitationCode=14153100693
โค2๐1

Channel
@bombersmmm
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
18,103subscribers
-903 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001648042386 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bombersmmm |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bombersmmm |
Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 18,103 | -22 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 18,125 | -59 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 18,184 | -52 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 18,236 | -69 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 18,305 | -68 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 18,373 | +265 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 18,108 | -94 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 18,202 | +268 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:34 | 17,934 | -40 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 17,974 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 17,989 | -25 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 18,014 | -30 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 18,044 | -22 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 18,066 | -26 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 18,092 | -45 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 18,137 | -51 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 18,188 | -90 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 18,278 | -79 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 18,357 | -63 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 18,420 | first reading |
579 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 155 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 579 (7 August 2026 โ 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,580 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 08:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
51 reactions across 21 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 16 | 31.4% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 11 | 21.6% | |
| ๐ | 9 | 17.6% | |
| ๐ฅ | 9 | 17.6% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 5.88% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.96% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.96% | |
| ๐ฏ | 1 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 579 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 579 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Use these domains: shreewin22.com shreewin44.com shreewin41.com shreewin29.com shreewin10.com https://www.shreewin44.com/#/register?invitationCode=14153100693
โค2๐1
https://www.shreewin.net/#/register?invitationCode=14153100693
https://www.shreewin.net/#/register?invitationCode=14153100693
Be Ready Shreewin Coming !!! ๐จ
๐ฅ3โค2๐2๐1๐ฏ1
https://t.me/ShreeWins/27
๐ฅฐ4
Shree win - Advance Giving Started , Dแด ~ @ShreeWins
โค3๐1๐1๐ฅ1๐ฅฐ1
Platform launch at 3rd September ๐ Ready Everyone Join Our Team https://t.me/ShreeWins https://t.me/ShreeWins https://t.me/ShreeWins
๐ฅ2๐ฅฐ2๐1
๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ SOMEONE IS DEFINITELY MAKING MONEY. โ๏ธ YOU CAN CHECK THE SCREENSHOT TO SEE HOW MUCH PROFIT THESE PEOPLE ARE MAKING. ๐ฐ SO, IF YOU ALSO WANT TO MAKE THIS KIND OF PROFIT, SIMPLY CREATE AN ACCOUNT USING OUR LINK AND DEPOSIT FUNDS. ๐คฉ ๐ฅ REGISTER LINK ๐ฅ https://yaarwin.app/#/register?invitationCode=74252113695
๐1๐ฅ1๐ฅฐ1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
โค2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 579 posts we hold for @bombersmmm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฉ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฆ๐ต๐ผ๐ ๐ข๐ณ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐นโ (@bombersmmm), 18,103 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bombersmmm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.