Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net +231. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,288–9,717 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Sept 2026, 02:37
9,584
-16
10 Sept 2026, 00:40
9,600
-27
4 Sept 2026, 07:37
9,627
-29
1 Sept 2026, 07:07
9,656
-11
28 Aug 2026, 22:58
9,667
+34
26 Aug 2026, 04:02
9,633
+69
22 Aug 2026, 23:56
9,564
-2
19 Aug 2026, 22:26
9,566
+38
16 Aug 2026, 20:18
9,528
+46
13 Aug 2026, 04:58
9,482
+145
10 Aug 2026, 02:51
9,337
-7
6 Aug 2026, 23:05
9,344
-9
6 Aug 2026, 04:52
9,353
first reading
Engagement
51 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.3%
avg views ÷ 9,584 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,140
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 51 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
51 (18 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
32,038
Reactions total
1,874
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 46s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,579 reactions across 46 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,168
38.9%
🥰
734
13.2%
❤🔥
679
12.2%
🔥
607
10.9%
💘
509
9.12%
🍓
249
4.46%
😍
225
4.03%
😢
184
3.30%
💯
50
0.896%
🤣
50
0.896%
💋
40
0.717%
😁
27
0.484%
💔
22
0.394%
🕊
16
0.287%
🙈
9
0.161%
👀
6
0.108%
👍
3
0.054%
😎
1
0.018%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,579 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 46 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @book_world_5. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩🤩🤩🤩Прошлой ночью я
🤩🤩🤩🤩похитил ее из
🤩🤩🤩🤩постели, связал и
🤩🤩🤩🤩положил в свой багажник, а затем отвез в лес, приставил к ее голове пистолет, дал ей лопату и велел копать могилу. Большинство людей наложили бы в штаны, если бы такое случилось. Но что сделала она? Она швырнула лопату обратно в меня и сказала, чтобы я сам ее выкопал.
🧚♀️🍷🤩
book: Манящая тьма
avtor: Рейвен Вуд
😊Какие они ром…
🤍🤍— Как бы… моя работа обязывает тебя остановить, но… мне интересно, сколько же в тебя влезет?.. — с удивлением произнесла девчонка, неотрывно смотря на Итана. Ее нежный голос пронесся по кухне.
Это вообще кто такая? Наша няня? Это няня? Они молодеют с каждым разом.
Скрестив руки на груди, я, подошел ближе, привлекая внимание.
— Я так понимаю это наша новая няня? — обратился я в частности к девушке. Она же, в свою оч…
💍💍💍Отзыв на книгу
💍💍💍«Эндшпиль» Камилы
💍💍💍Соколовой
▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️
Дорогой автор, почему ты не попадалась мне раньше?! Это мое первое знакомство с твоим творчеством, и ты сразу же попала в топ моих любимых писателей!
▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️
🐾Интересная ли книга? Стоит ли читать и покупать? Да, да и еще раз да!
🐾Если честно, сначала я не ожидала ничего особенного, учитывая, что прочла уже очень много книг на х…
Девчуль, хотела задать вам вопрос)) В каком формате вам больше нравятся отрывки из книг: с коллажем эстетики или с Артами (их начала делать совсем недавно.. я наконец наладила отношения с ИИ!!!)
Коллаж53%
Арты62%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
💖💖– Мира, – начал Роберт, и у
💖💖меня внутри все упало. Все барьеры, которые я выстроила. Потому что он снова произнес имя так… словно снял его с небес. – Почему ты не отвечала на звонки и сообщения? – он дотронулся до моей руки. – Только честно?
Я сглотнула комок, который поцарапал мне горло. Вот и что сказать?
– Э-э-э… мне было некогда.
Роберт кивнул с видом «я так и знал».
– Ты испугалась? – спросил он так нежно, с…
❤️🔥❤️🔥— Я отпущу ее, — обещает
❤️🔥❤️🔥Кейден. — В обмен на
❤️🔥❤️🔥брата. И имя.
Взгляд Михаила становится острее.
— Что?
Кейден смотрит на меня сверху вниз, все еще прижимая лезвие к моему подбородку.
— Как тебя зовут, маленькая лань?
Мое сердце делает странное сальто от того, как он произносит этот вопрос.
— Ты, блять... — начинает Михаил.
Я перебиваю его, прежде чем он успевает сказать что-то еще, что может сно…
🕯️🕯️— На какое расстояние мне
🕯️🕯️отойти? — шепчет.
— Вставай к стене, я сама отойду. — шепчу в ответ.
Брайан отходит к стене и, расслабленно убрав руки в карманы штанов, замирает в ожидании моих действий. Отхожу в другой конец комнаты на расстояние около пяти метров от Брайана, рассчитывая количество оборотов, которое успеет совершить нож.
— Так, всё. Сандра, мы все поверили. Правда, ребят?
Они дружно поддакивают, н…
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
ПРИРУЧИ МЕНЯ, 💚💚
ЕСЛИ СМОЖЕШЬ 💚💚
💚Аннотация:
В свободное от учебы время Лекси Максфил подрабатывает няней. Этих денег как раз хватает, чтобы помогать отцу. Поэтому она сразу соглашается стать няней младших братьев Лендона Роя — одного из самых популярных парней школы. Лендон умный, красивый и харизматичный, и он прекрасно это понимает. Но все, что ему важно — это музыка. В ней…
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @book_world_5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@book_world_5 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Девчуль, хотела задать вам вопрос)) В каком формате вам больше нравятся отрывки из книг: с коллажем эстетики или с Артами (их начала делать совсем недавно.. я наконец наладила отношения с ИИ!!!)
Коллаж53%
Арты62%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Bookssloover @bookssloveer · 30,227 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 7 September 2026
𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒂.𝒃𝒐𝒐𝒌𝒔 💚 @hinabooks · 29,934 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книжный мир” (@book_world_5), 9,584 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/book_world_5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.