Channel
@bookmark_club
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
259subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002432047040 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bookmark_club |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bookmark_club |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 259 | -3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 262 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 267 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 268 | -8 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:59 | 276 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 277 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 277 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
88 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 47 | 53.4% | |
| ⚡ | 12 | 13.6% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 10.2% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5327966841186826177 | 5 | 5.68% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.41% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.14% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📚 Yu Hua — "Yashamoq" Inson hayotining eng og‘ir sinovlari, dardlari va yo‘qotishlari orasida ham yashashga bo‘lgan intilish — bu kitobning eng asosiy g‘oyasi. Xitoy adabiyotining yirik vakillaridan biri Yu Hua qalamiga mansub "Yashamoq" romani oddiy inson taqdiri orqali hayotning qadr-qimmati, sabr va umidning haqiqiy ma'nosini ochib beradi. Asarda bosh qahramon Fu Gui hayoti misolida inson boshiga tushadigan sino…
❤1
📢 Eslatma! Kitob suhbati ertaga soat 11:00 da bo'lib o'tadi. 📍Manzil: Delight kafesi
📚 Doktor Abdurahmon Rof'at Al-Bosho — "Tobeinlar hayotidan lavhalar" Tobeinlar kimlar edi va nima uchun ularning hayoti bugungi kunda ham biz uchun ibrat bo'lib qolmoqda? Ushbu kitob sahobalardan keyingi eng fazilatli avlod — tobeinlar hayotidan hikoya qiladi. Asarda ularning ilmga chanqoqligi, taqvosi, odobi va Alloh yo'lidagi fidoyiligi ta'sirli lavhalar orqali yoritiladi. 💡 Bu safar suhbatimizda: — tobeinlarnin…
🔥4⚡1❤1
✨XUSH XABAR! ✨ Deyarli 2 yil kutish... va nihoyat — BUSA shaxmat turniri yana sizni kutmoqda! ♟🔥 Bu safar ancha jiddiyroq: yangi format, katta sovrinlar va albatta — o'sha adrenalin, o'sha strategik jang, o'sha g'alaba hissi! Mayli, shaxmatni professional darajada o'ynaysizmi yoki shunchaki do'stlar davrasida vaqt o'tkazishni yaxshi ko'rasizmi — farqi yo'q. Bu yerda har bir kishi uchun joy bor: yangi tanishuvlar, aq…
👏1🔥1
📚 Navbatdagi mutolaa uchun kitob tanlandi! Bookmark bu oy doktor Abdurahmon Rof'at Al-Bosho qalamiga mansub "Tobeinlar hayotidan lavhalar" kitobini o‘qiydi. Bu kitob orqali Rasululloh ﷺ sahobalaridan keyingi eng fazilatli avlod — tobeinlar hayoti bilan yaqindan tanishamiz. Asarda ularning ilmga muhabbati, taqvosi, sabr-toqati, ixlosi va Alloh yo‘lidagi fidoyiligi haqida ta'sirli lavhalar jamlangan. Har bir hikoya n…
🔥4⚡1❤1🎉1custom 53279668411868261771
Bugun yana bir kitob suhbatini muvaffaqiyatli yakunladik✨ 💬 Siyosiy mavzularga oid kitoblarni tushunish har doim ham oson emas. Ammo ularni boshqalar bilan birgalikda muhokama qilish orqali ko‘plab savollarga javob topish, turli nuqtai nazarlarni eshitish va mavzuga chuqurroq yondashish mumkin. Bugun biz Mamlakatlar tanazzuli kitobini muhokama qilib, undan olgan bilimlarimiz, asosiy g‘oyalari hamda ayrim bahsli jih…
👍6⚡1❤1custom 53279668411868261771
📢 Eslatma! Kitob suhbati ertaga soat 10:00 da bo'lib o'tadi. 📍Manzil: Cappucino kafesi
⚡2🔥2custom 53279668411868261771
IQTIBOS✨ Misr qashshoqligining sababi mamlakatni bir hovuch elita boshqargani, jamiyat esa elitaning aholi hisobidan foyda ko'rishini ko'zlab qurilganidadir. 📖Mamlakatlar tanazzuli sabablari
🔥2👀1🤔1
📚 Daron Ajemog‘lu va Jeyms A. Robinson — "Mamlakatlar tanazzuli" Nega ba’zi mamlakatlar rivojlanadi, boshqalari esa ortda qoladi? Bu kitob bunga oddiy misollar orqali javob beradi. Unda institutlar, boshqaruv va tarixiy qarorlar mamlakat rivojiga qanday ta’sir qilishi tushuntiriladi. 💡 Bu safar: — mamlakatlarning muvaffaqiyati va tanazzuliga nimalar sabab bo‘lishi — institutlarning jamiyatdagi o‘rni — tarixdan qan…
🔥5⚡1❤1👍1custom 53279668411868261771
IQTIBOS✨ Bilimsizlik nazariyasiga ko'ra, qashshoq mamlakatlarda bozor inqirozlari ko'p bo'lib, iqtisodchilar va siyosatchilar ulardan qutulish yo'llaridan bexabardir. 📖Mamlakatlar tanazzuli sabablari
🔥4👍1
Mamlakatlar odamlar kambag‘al bo‘lgani uchun tanazzulga uchramaydi. Aksincha. Noto‘g‘ri tizim odamlarni kambag‘al qiladi. Agar mehnat qilish foyda bermasa, iste'dod jazolansa, korrupsiya mukofotlansa — tanazzul boshlanadi. 📖 Mamlakatlar tanazzuli sabablari
❤2🔥2
IQTIBOS✨ Iqtisod inson xulq-atvorini maqsadlar va qo'llash uchun muqobillari bo'lgan cheklangan vositalar o'rtasidagi munosabat sifatida o'rganadigan fandir. 📖Mamlakatlar tanazzuli sabablari
🔥5⚡1👏1custom 53279668411868261771
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @bookmark_club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bookmark | Kitobxonlik klubi” (@bookmark_club), 259 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bookmark_club.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.