Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بـين ـ أروقة الكُتب "اليمن"

Channel

بـين ـ أروقة الكُتب "اليمن"

@booktemey

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,261subscribers

-75 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001491888142
TypeChannel
Username@booktemey
Created26 July 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/booktemey

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,26114,34314,3026 August 2026 — 14,336 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,343 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,335 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,328 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,326 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,325 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,330 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,337 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,340 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,330 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,327 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,336 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,331 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,338 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,342 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,343 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,341 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,328 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,330 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,338 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,335 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,328 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,319 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,310 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,318 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,316 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,301 subscribers7 September 2026 — 14,282 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,261 subscribers6 August 202610 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 35 days, net -75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,249–14,355 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 09:1914,261-21
7 Sept 2026, 03:1914,282-19
4 Sept 2026, 14:2214,301-15
3 Sept 2026, 00:1914,316-2
1 Sept 2026, 22:3414,318+8
31 Aug 2026, 22:2514,310-9
31 Aug 2026, 00:3614,319-9
29 Aug 2026, 21:2414,328-7
28 Aug 2026, 18:5414,335-3
27 Aug 2026, 20:2414,338+8
26 Aug 2026, 22:0314,330+2
25 Aug 2026, 19:1414,328-13
24 Aug 2026, 21:5414,341-2
23 Aug 2026, 10:5814,343+1
22 Aug 2026, 00:4814,342+4
20 Aug 2026, 18:1714,338+7
19 Aug 2026, 19:1214,331-5
18 Aug 2026, 15:4214,336+9
17 Aug 2026, 18:0714,327-3
16 Aug 2026, 15:0414,330first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 31 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.02%
avg views ÷ 14,261 subscribers
Avg views / post
146
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
48
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held80 (31 May 20262 September 2026)
Views total6,997
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:42 UTC20 viewsread 2 September 2026

خسارة تدرس طب🥼وما عندك هاي القنوات😍👇

Signed بوت دعم القنوات الطبية 🥼

2 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTC49 viewsread 2 September 2026

فنون الرد على الإهانة🚫🎩 https://t.me/+mJIiaNxkTXE2NTdk فنون الـرد 🔥 👆

Signed .

2 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC53 viewsread 2 September 2026

في زحمة القنوات… هناك قنوات تُشاهدها، وقنوات تشعر بها. 🤍 ادخلوا وتصفحوا بأنفسكم😉🫶🤍:

Signed لستة بين أروقة الكُتب

1 Sept 2026, 21:46 UTC118 viewsread 2 September 2026

"أن يُسَاء فهمك، أن يَسهُل تكذيب نواياك، أن تُنشَر عنك وشاية، أن يُستهان بِشخصك، أن يُستخفّ بقدراتك، أن يَتأسّى بك إنسانٌ بناءً على تصوُّرٍ رَسَمَه عنك، أن تكون شامخًا محبوبًا في نظر إنسان، مَكروهًا تافهًا في نظر الآخَر، كل هذه الانطباعات تثبت حقيقة أنه لا يعرفك إلا الله."

Signed سحر سلطان🍃.

1 Sept 2026, 12:36 UTC25 viewsread 1 September 2026

خسارة تدرس طب🥼وما عندك هاي القنوات😍👇

Signed بوت دعم القنوات الطبية 🥼

31 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC19 viewsread 31 August 2026

خسارة تدرس طب🥼وما عندك هاي القنوات😍👇

Signed بوت دعم القنوات الطبية 🥼

31 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC38 viewsread 31 August 2026

فنون الرد على الإهانة🚫🎩 https://t.me/+mJIiaNxkTXE2NTdk فنون الـرد 🔥 👆

Signed .

31 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC45 viewsread 31 August 2026

من ترك الأصيل باختياره، أذلته الحياة بالرديء رغمًا عنه، فما أشد تأديب الأيام حين تعلم المرء قيمة..

Signed لستة بين أروقة الكُتب

30 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC468 viewsread 2 September 2026

لم أكن أمتلك في السابق معيارًا واضحًا في اختيار من حولي من الناس، فمرةً يغريني في الإنسان سعة علمه واطلاعه، وتارةً يغريني ذكاؤه وسرعة بداهته، وكرةً فصاحته وحسن حديثه، وطورًا اجتهاده وتجلّده في العمل، وغير ذلك من المعايير التي تجعلك تميل للاقتراب منه والعمل معه. لكن حين عدتُ إلى القرآن وجدت المعيار واضحًا، وهو معيار الصدق {يا أيها الذين آمنوا اتقوا الله وكونوا مع الصادقين}. تساءلت: ما الفئات الأخرى التي أمرنا الله أ

Signed سحر سلطان🍃.

30 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC9 viewsread 30 August 2026

خسارة تدرس طب🥼وما عندك هاي القنوات😍👇

Signed بوت دعم القنوات الطبية 🥼

30 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC29 viewsread 30 August 2026

فنون الرد على الإهانة🚫🎩 https://t.me/+mJIiaNxkTXE2NTdk فنون الـرد 🔥 👆

Signed .

30 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC39 viewsread 30 August 2026

من ترك الأصيل باختياره، أذلته الحياة بالرديء رغمًا عنه، فما أشد تأديب الأيام حين تعلم المرء قيمة..

Signed لستة بين أروقة الكُتب

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @booktemey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

كن قويا | Be Strong تحفيزات ،
@Dr7step · 40,136
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
💊 ثقافة صحية طبية 😉(اساسيات طبطوب)
@drtabtob · 65,635
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
همسات ٲطباء...🇵🇸✊🏻💜
@teeb_kasha · 108,486
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بـين ـ أروقة الكُتب "اليمن"” (@booktemey), 14,261 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/booktemey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.