clarx_am4 pinned a photo

Channel
clarx_am4
@boredyh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
62,941subscribers
+63 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001247449211 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @boredyh |
| Description | 🥨Since 15 may 2021 🥨jual AM prem https://t.me/m/GnUl4aieMjA1 https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VawoyLxDzgT97Zk3Qg0q 📨pp udh close || pl https://t.me/ppclarx/2 + Jasdit Own @iClarx |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 52 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/boredyh |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:26 | 62,941 | -15 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:48 | 62,956 | -23 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 20:21 | 62,979 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:59 | 62,981 | +22 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:50 | 62,959 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 62,957 | -35 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:40 | 62,992 | -27 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:29 | 63,019 | +103 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:29 | 62,916 | -9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:00 | 62,925 | +3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:35 | 62,922 | +14 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:50 | 62,908 | +25 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:47 | 62,883 | +3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:08 | 62,880 | -11 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:50 | 62,891 | -40 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 62,931 | +23 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 22:55 | 62,908 | +48 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 13:57 | 62,860 | +474 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 62,386 | +63 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 62,323 | first reading |
Engagement
236 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 193 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.31%
- avg views ÷ 62,941 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,970
- 56 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 79
- of 236 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 236 (14 July 2026 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 222,276 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Oct 2026, 16:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,290
- Videos
- ≈1,310
- Links
- ≈1,420
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 14m 02s
- Average length
- 19s
Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🙌🏻 READY NETFLIX ONHAND🙌🏻 ⚠️ Sharing 1 User⚠️ 1 days 800p 1 weeks 5.000 1 month 9.000 ⚠️ Sharing 2 User ⚠️ 1 days 750p 1 weeks 4.500 1 month 8.500 ⚠️Semi private ⚠️ 1 days 1.000 1 weeks 6.500 1 month 20.000 ‼️ ALWAYS READY, BISA LANGSUNG TF ‼️ ‼️ LOGIN LINK ONLY ‼️ ‼️ SEMI PRIVATE LOGIN BY LINK CANNOT REQUEST ‼️ ‼️ BLACKMARKET! DON'T EXPECT TO MUCH ‼️ ‼️ FULL GARANSI ASAL MEMATUHI SNK, SEND BUKTI LOGIN, ISI RNK ‼…
Signed clarx
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSgvSAmYh/
Signed clarx
clarx_am4 pinned «ㅤㅤ🧁💕 # (@aeravie) ★. PRICELIST TELEPREM VILOG » teleprem 1b : 58.000 » teleprem 1y : 365.000 ★. PRICELIST TELESTARS GIFT » 15 stars : 4.500 » 25 stars : 7.500 » 50 stars : 15.000 » 100 stars : 30.000 ★. PRICELIST TELESTARS TOPUP » 50 stars : 15.000…»
ㅤㅤ🧁💕 # (@aeravie) ★. PRICELIST TELEPREM VILOG » teleprem 1b : 58.000 » teleprem 1y : 365.000 ★. PRICELIST TELESTARS GIFT » 15 stars : 4.500 » 25 stars : 7.500 » 50 stars : 15.000 » 100 stars : 30.000 ★. PRICELIST TELESTARS TOPUP » 50 stars : 15.000 » 75 stars : 25.000 » 100 stars : 30.000 » 150 stars : 45.000 » 200 stars : 60.000 » 300 stars : 90.000 » 400 stars : 110.000 » 500 stars : 140.000 » 1000 star…
Signed clarx
🥺honeybee 🎁preset 🎁xml 🎁tt 🎁mnthn+FONT xml nnti gdrive lg error 🕳🕳🕳🕳 🤩paspres+vs 🤩untuk pl disini 🤩testie 5k+
Signed clarx
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSgGXp7nK/
Signed clarx
🪷limbo 🌟preset 🌟xml 🌟font 🌟cc 🌟tt 🕳🕳🕳🕳 🤩paspres+vs 🤩untuk pl disini 🤩testie 5k+
Signed clarx
clarx_am4 pinned «NYARI RESS TELEPREM, TELESTARS, APK PREM, NOKTEL, NOKWA, NOKOS ALL APK YANG MURAH MERIAH? SINI KE RESS KITTY AJAA TELEPREM 1 BULAN 50K TELESTARS 50S 14K NETFLIX 1U1D START 1K NETFLIX 2U1D START 900P CANVA 1B 100P CAPCUT 1B 1K YT FAMPLAN 1B 4K AM PRIVAT 1…»
NYARI RESS TELEPREM, TELESTARS, APK PREM, NOKTEL, NOKWA, NOKOS ALL APK YANG MURAH MERIAH? SINI KE RESS KITTY AJAA TELEPREM 1 BULAN 50K TELESTARS 50S 14K NETFLIX 1U1D START 1K NETFLIX 2U1D START 900P CANVA 1B 100P CAPCUT 1B 1K YT FAMPLAN 1B 4K AM PRIVAT 1 YEAR 500P SPOTIFY 1B 10K VIU PRIV ANLIM 1 YEAR 500P NOKTEL FS 6K NOKOS WA START 5K NOKOS ALL APK START 1K BURUAN JOIN, MASIH BANYAK PL LAIN YANG MURAH, YAKIN KALI…
Signed clarx
Long text ala cowo au?
Signed San Jèndral. @WAJIBRNK.
@au
Signed San Jèndral. @WAJIBRNK.
Showing the 12 most recent of 236 posts we hold for @boredyh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
pilih jj collab
- 16 orang75%
- 32 orangg42%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 236 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 31 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@kedairizee · 2,96920 posts♡
@infoaeravie · 12415 postsAlight Motion (am) Premium
@tokoampriv · 4,26514 postsJuliet archive
@Rpengusaha · 2713 postsfayeshil premium
@fayeshil · 1,3117 postsRESS KITTY
@Resskittyc · 183 posts𖹭 archive bunskith 𖹭
@archivejir · 461 postinfo ress riźe
@arsipressrize · 1871 post⌗ 𝗧𝗔𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗡 — 𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗛𝗜𝗩𝗘
@tavernarchive · 51 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@clarxzy · 1,87035 postsmentahan edit @clarx_am4
@gataupusinhj · 5,83929 postsrose-brined. Rize!
@arsiprize · 13320 posts𝜗𝜚๋ Rize shop
@kedairizee · 2,96920 postsLONG TEXT – BULOL “୭ৎ!
@LOONGTEXT · 48,16219 postsEH—lees!
@ehlees · 1,44716 postsAlight Motion (am) Premium
@tokoampriv · 4,26514 posts“ 𑣿 ”•──── the proof. 𓆪
@lhraastsha · 7313 postsKeep
@Bnunbaekhyun · 29 postsBuyer
@Bumyer · 139 postsJuliet archive
@Rpengusaha · 279 postsfayeshil premium
@fayeshil · 1,3118 postsproof @yuujtin
@vouchsley · 567 postsvouches
@Buktinor · 22 postsRRELIC ; GALLERY USN & GIFT
@rrelic · 2442 posts#𝟶𝟶𝟷 𝅄 ֹ 𝓛𝖾𝖼𝗂 𝖠𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗋 ( 🪽 ) testimoni ˖࣪ ıl ⋆ 𝒷𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖾'𝗌 𝄂𝄚𝅦
@testimonilecistoree · 31 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 3
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@boredyh named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 35 posts, 8 August 2026 – 14 September 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 32 posts, 8 August 2026 – 31 October 2026 · confirmed gone 25 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 4 posts, 11 September 2026 – 12 September 2026 · confirmed gone 4 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 10 September 2026 – 27 October 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“clarx_am4” (@boredyh), 62,941 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boredyh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.