Channel
@boris_psychologist
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
122subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001533078679 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @boris_psychologist |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/boris_psychologist |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 122 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 123 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 123 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 12 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
118 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 45.8% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 28.0% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 5.08% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 5.08% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 2.54% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 2.54% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2024 to 8 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сотрудники Живёт свою жизнь человек, и в ус не дышит. Интересуется, справляется, растёт. Потом встречает другого — и, начинает любить. Чудесным образом, то есть необъяснимо — отношения увлекают настолько, что забывается главное. То, что интересно. В чём человек рос, изучал и обретал себя — как личность. Деятельность, увлекающая человека незаметно покрывается пылью. И даже забывается. Подобно книге давно начатой…
🔥4❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥2🤝1
Выбираем тему для моего видео:
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✍️ Завершил работу с парой клиентов, и кажется освободилось время. Значит я могу взять ещё людей в работу (кому надо — пишите), и записать видео по длиннее, да пооснавательней.😎 🌱🌱🌱 Есть темы мне интересные, но с какой начать — вы, дорогие мои, очень можете помочь определиться! Что вам интереснее? (ниже опрос, приглашаю к участию)
❤2
С новым, психологически благополучным, годом! 🫡
❤7🤝1🥰1
Простой, доведённый до автоматизма вопрос — «почему?» (вариация вопроса «за что?») — снижает вероятность бодрого решения. Простой, доведённый до автоматизма вопрос — «что я могу с этим сделать?» (вариация вопроса «как я влияю и как могу это улучшить?») — расширяет вероятность и своего личностного роста (даже в ухудшающейся проблеме), и в решении этой самой проблемы — в космос. Просто подмечаем привычки своего проце…
❤7
Иронично, когда то именно сегодня был главный праздник. А теперь — День знаний. Понимаю все культурные и прочие приколы, из-за которых НГ вне конкуренции. Как по мне — сегодня по-настоящему объединяющий, усиливающий нас как человечество праздник. Пусть разнообразие жизни мира и сформировало запрос на обезболивающюю астрохиромантию. Но, знания живы. Учителя есть и они активны. Преподавание в андеграунде, но трени…
🎉3🔥2👍1
Размышления в #мудрость_дня Тем кто на старте отношений стоит следить за двумя процессами. Первый — своей идеализацией. То есть дорисовыванием реального человека красками своих «как бы» удовлетворённых потребностей. Типа «ах, какой он классный/ ох, счас как заживу!» Этот процесс все равно будет, просто наблюдай за ним. Хотя бы. В идеале — разделять, где человек реальный открывается тебе, а где ты сам ему пририсо…
❤6
С праздничком!❤️
❤6😁4🥰2🔥1
#подкастошная Была у меня одна отличная беседа, а я и не пригласил вас к просмотру. Вот, приглашаю🙃 Тарас Заславский — психолог, пригласил меня на подкаст, и мы глубоко говорили о всяком. Прошу к экрану 😉 ТГ Тараса: https://t.me/depression_false Сам подкаст: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUQD-Hw41mo
🔥2❤1🤝1
Ого! Да это же первый в 2025 году эфир с самим Петром Звоновым! Будем обсуждать важное и отвечать на вопросы. И всё по науке, как вы любите. Понедельник, 27 января, 18:00 Мск. На ютубчике, вот: https://youtube.com/live/BsjQngoC8BM?feature=share Вопросы можно заранее слать сюда, ответим не на все, но на многие: https://forms.gle/B3ycyDQKFjiSgNXRA __ Проект Петра [99 мыслей]: ВК: https://vk.com/99thoughtz?from=sea…
❤4👍2🔥2
Год ушёл, а знания остались. "Чем хуже — тем лучше, волшебная палочка-похудалочка и арт терапия" — каким был 2024 год в исследованиях. Мой субъективный топ Психологии как науки. Сперва по пунктам, а в комментарии ссылки на исследования. 1. Начну с любимого. Шнобелевскую премию в медицине вручили за открытие связи плацебо с побочкой. Если тебе хреново, например, от антидепрессантов — ты думаешь "значит работают". …
❤9🔥2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @boris_psychologist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выбираем тему для моего видео:
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2024 to 8 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@boris_psychologist named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Борис, что со мной? | Психология как наука” (@boris_psychologist), 122 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boris_psychologist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.