Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Борис Марцинкевич

Channel

Борис Марцинкевич

@borisgeoenergetic

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,637subscribers

+224 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001762941985
TypeChannel
Username@borisgeoenergetic
DescriptionГлавный редактор аналитического издания об энергетике, полезных ископаемых и промышленности «Геоэнергетика ИНФО» @geonrgru
Created16 July 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/borisgeoenergetic

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

32,400 average views per post against 17,637 subscribers — an engagement rate of 183.7%. Across the 21,335 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.84% and 23.6%, with a median of 12.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured22 of 22 published in the window (0 exact, 22 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled712,930
Mature posts only183.7% over 22 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers17,637 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 21,335 channels · p10 2.94% · p25 5.84% · p50 12.1% · p75 23.6% · p90 42.5%
Position in cohort99.859th percentile · 15.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.169% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

17,36617,67517,520.56 August 2026 — 17,413 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,413 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,411 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,412 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,419 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,418 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,416 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,419 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,417 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,414 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,408 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,412 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,417 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,416 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,419 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,414 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,417 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,416 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,419 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,416 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,410 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,409 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,410 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,406 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,402 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,398 subscribers8 September 2026 — 17,402 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,407 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,390 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,383 subscribers16 September 2026 — 17,376 subscribers18 September 2026 — 17,366 subscribers1 October 2026 — 17,405 subscribers9 October 2026 — 17,392 subscribers13 October 2026 — 17,669 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,673 subscribers15 October 2026 — 17,675 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,670 subscribers17 October 2026 — 17,665 subscribers18 October 2026 — 17,659 subscribers19 October 2026 — 17,656 subscribers20 October 2026 — 17,652 subscribers22 October 2026 — 17,637 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,634 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,628 subscribers26 October 2026 — 17,626 subscribers26 October 2026 — 17,621 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,616 subscribers28 October 2026 — 17,615 subscribers29 October 2026 — 17,612 subscribers31 October 2026 — 17,632 subscribers1 November 2026 — 17,625 subscribers2 November 2026 — 17,626 subscribers3 November 2026 — 17,629 subscribers4 November 2026 — 17,634 subscribers5 November 2026 — 17,637 subscribers6 November 2026 — 17,636 subscribers8 November 2026 — 17,637 subscribers17,6376 August 20268 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 94 days, net +224. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,320–17,721 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 12:2117,637+1
6 Nov 2026, 05:3517,636-1
5 Nov 2026, 07:0817,637+3
4 Nov 2026, 05:1617,634+5
3 Nov 2026, 04:4917,629+3
2 Nov 2026, 03:4717,626+1
1 Nov 2026, 01:2017,625-7
31 Oct 2026, 01:0817,632+20
29 Oct 2026, 22:1117,612-3
28 Oct 2026, 21:2117,615-1
27 Oct 2026, 23:1917,616-5
26 Oct 2026, 23:5717,621-5
26 Oct 2026, 03:0917,626-2
23 Oct 2026, 23:1817,628-6
23 Oct 2026, 00:5717,634-3
22 Oct 2026, 01:3917,637-15
20 Oct 2026, 17:5817,652-4
19 Oct 2026, 16:3617,656-3
18 Oct 2026, 17:3417,659-6
17 Oct 2026, 17:4717,665first reading

Engagement

84 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
168.7%
avg views ÷ 17,637 subscribers
Avg views / post
29,800
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.407%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 84 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held84 (28 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total744,010
Reactions total3,030
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 17:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈181
Videos
≈755
Links
≈1,140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6h 02m
Average length
12m 57s

Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,704 reactions across 84 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4,45651.2%
🔥1,61918.6%
❤1,00911.6%
💯6217.13%
🤔5746.59%
🤯1151.32%
😡1121.29%
👎600.689%
⚡510.586%
😢460.528%
🕊230.264%
❤‍🔥120.138%
🫡60.069%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,704 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 84 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @borisgeoenergetic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 84 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (36.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 10:25 UTC≈1,690 views65 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Росатом» планирует построить крупнейший в России завод по переработке уранового сырья Если отбросить все красивости про"роботизацию-автоматизацию-цифровизацию", которые не несут никакого смыслового содержания (зато журналистам нравится просто до судорог), то перед нами - одна из самых огромных загадок Росатома за последние несколько десятков лет. Вот данные из материалов "Росатом недра" по итогам 2024 года (в перес…

🤔44💯15❤4🔥1😡1

6 Nov 2026, 16:48 UTC≈6,120 views108 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Сделка Трампа по российскому дизелю срывается, считают эксперты FT. Даже если на минутку забыть, что Financial Time входит в состав всемирного информационного холдинга "Один Блумберг Сказал" (сокращенно - ОБС) и решить, что в этот раз новость соответствует действительности - все равно непонятно, что нового мы видим. То, что досужие журналисты называют "дизельной сделкой Трампа и Путина" таковой, разумеется, не явля…

👍86🤔9🔥7💯4😡2

6 Nov 2026, 12:09 UTC≈2,810 views158 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Выгодна ли нам ситуация в Ормузском проливе и на мировых рынках? В краткосрочной перспективе – конечно – мы поправляем свой бюджет, у нас же расходы выросли. Всё, что происходит на линии боевого соприкосновения, требует весьма серьёзного финансирования. Но в долгосрочной перспективе для нас в этом никакой выгоды нет. Самая пострадавшая страна сейчас во всей этой ситуации —Иран. Там скачет уровень инфляции, там разру…

💯116👍24❤12🤔5😡1

6 Nov 2026, 10:49 UTC≈2,940 views149 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Европейские санкции никто не отменяет, что в нынешних экономических условиях выглядит совершенно дико. О чём нам сообщает Урсула фон дер Ляйен? О том, что, не получив ни одного грамма нового энергетического сырья, они потратили на его закупку примерно на 100 миллиардов больше. Сколько Европа в таком режиме выдержит? От поставок энергетических ресурсов она зависит на 92 процента. Так почему санкции не отменяются? Кр…

💯109👍21🤔8🔥7😡4

3 Nov 2026, 08:50 UTC≈6,400 views219 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Минстрой подготовил концепцию введения инвестиционных надбавок в тарифы на тепловую энергию, водоснабжение и водоотведение. Надбавки должны стать дополнительным источником финансирования для прекращения наращивания износа сетей. Прекращение износа сетей — это техническая проблема, которую необходимо решить. Решение ЛЮБОЙ технической проблемы начинается с технического аудита — это базис, аксиома, краеугольный камень,…

🔥135👍57😡17🤔5🤯5

2 Nov 2026, 20:04 UTC≈4,710 views162 reactionsread 8 November 2026

США предлагают возобновить поставки российского газа в Европу через Украину, - The Wall Street Journal Великолепная инициатива, талантливые журналисты, совершенно реальный проект". Решить нужно какие-то мелочи и пустяки. 1) Отменить регламент ЕС 2026/261, запрещающий поставки российского трубопроводного газа с 01.11.2027; 2) отменить указа Президента России № 172 от 31.03.2022; 3) объяснить Газпрому, за каким ангело…

🔥86👍42💯26😡5🤔3

2 Nov 2026, 06:32 UTC≈4,500 views174 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @elgacompanyPhoto

Морской угольный терминал «Порт Эльга» вышел на проектную мощность По итогам октября 2026 года в морском угольном терминале «Порт Эльга» отгружено 2,5 млн т угля. Это соответствует 30 млн т в годовом эквиваленте – проектной мощности порта. Таким образом, терминал вышел на запланированные показатели всего через два месяца после официального запуска. Старт работе терминала на ВЭФ-2026 дал Президент России Владимир Пут…

👍128🔥35❤9👎1😡1

31 Oct 2026, 14:13 UTC≈4,390 views91 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Уголь Якутии: феномен Эльги, кризис добычи в РФ и скрытые богатства недр Борис Марцинкевич детально разбирает реальное состояние угольной промышленности Якутии на фоне затяжного кризиса отрасли в России и жесткого санкционного давления. Вы узнаете, почему показатели Эльгинского месторождения идут вверх вопреки спаду у гигантов «Колмар» и «Мечел», и какую фактическую пользу от частных сырьевых проектов получает регио…

👍68🔥16🫡3🤔2😡2

30 Oct 2026, 12:02 UTC≈4,550 views104 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Росатом в Африке: почему АЭС не спасут континент и что решит энергокризис? Борис Марцинкевич детально разбирает энергетические итоги саммита «Россия - Африка» и перспективы экспансии Росатома на континент. Анализируем, почему атомная энергетика и возобновляемые источники энергии требуют слишком много времени и не способны быстро ликвидировать жесточайший дефицит электроэнергии у сотен миллионов людей. Ключевым решен…

👍80❤14🔥5💯3😡2

30 Oct 2026, 10:33 UTC≈3,880 views30 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @energounionPhoto

‼️ Прием заявок на соискание Премии-2026 продлен до 6 ноября 📍 Прием заявок на соискание XII Международной премии «Малая энергетика – большие достижения» продлен до 6 ноября (включительно) 🔸 10 ноября на сайте проекта будет опубликован Шорт-лист Премии - список номинантов, допущенных организаторами к конкурсу. 🔸 После этого к анализу поступивших заявок приступит Международный экспертный совет. В него вошли 40 учен…

👍27😡2❤1

30 Oct 2026, 06:55 UTC≈529,000 views141 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Новостей о перспективах сотрудничества России, Росатома со странами Африка на полях третьего саммита «Россия — Африка» - много, запутаться довольно легко. Если систематизировать, то получается приблизительно вот так: Египет - АЭС «Эль-Дабаа», возможные блоки №5–6, ПЭБ. Четыре блока строятся; расширение обсуждается. Эфиопия - Большая АЭС. Дорожная карта на 2026–2027 годы, подготовка к выбору площадки. Руанда - Назем…

👍88🔥25❤15🤔11⚡2

27 Oct 2026, 15:21 UTC≈8,880 views230 reactionsread 8 November 2026

И снова о дизельной сделке. Сегодняшнее сообщение Financial Times по данным отслеживания судов: ожидаемый срок прибытия танкера Agioi Fanendes в Нью-Йорк - 7 ноября. Нет, не так - СЕДЬМОЕ НОЯБРЯ. Готовиться надо! Исключительно в благотворительных целях подготовил речь для Д. Трампа, который наверняка ведь явится в порт. "Товарищи! В этот знаменательный день, 7 ноября, российский дизель, о котором так много плакали …

🔥161👍47❤15💯5🕊2

Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @borisgeoenergetic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@borisgeoenergetic edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 11 posts on @borisgeoenergetic as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

"Нефтегазовая игра" с Александром Фроловым
@OilGasGame · 24,830
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Геоэнергетика ИНФО
@geonrgru · 138,946
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Сделано в России
@madeinrussia_ru · 24,992
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
ИнфоТЭК
@Infotek_Russia · 33,196
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
Dave_englishbad
@dave_englishbad · 21,789
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
Испания Наизнанку
@realspaininsideout · 21,652
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Борис Марцинкевич” (@borisgeoenergetic), 17,637 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borisgeoenergetic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.