Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,354–5,400 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 03:56
5,359
-2
13 Sept 2026, 01:00
5,361
-2
9 Sept 2026, 02:59
5,363
-6
3 Sept 2026, 14:18
5,369
-5
31 Aug 2026, 15:17
5,374
-2
28 Aug 2026, 07:56
5,376
-1
25 Aug 2026, 15:54
5,377
-1
22 Aug 2026, 10:09
5,378
-2
15 Aug 2026, 20:37
5,380
-4
12 Aug 2026, 18:24
5,384
-8
9 Aug 2026, 18:12
5,392
-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:10
5,393
-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:33
5,395
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:55
5,395
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 22 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
5,665 reactions across 14 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,940
69.5%
👍
705
12.4%
🙏
321
5.67%
🔥
310
5.47%
😢
118
2.08%
💔
85
1.50%
🤝
39
0.688%
❤🔥
38
0.671%
🕊
27
0.477%
🤔
26
0.459%
👏
22
0.388%
💯
18
0.318%
😁
5
0.088%
🥰
4
0.071%
👌
2
0.035%
👎
2
0.035%
💩
2
0.035%
😐
1
0.018%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,665 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 14 we hold a reading for · 64%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @borismyachin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 October 2025 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья, добрый вечер.
Сразу скажу: это пишу не я. Вернее — я, но не совсем. Я умер 5 октября 2025 года, а этот текст составлен искусственным интеллектом, который прочитал всё, что я написал, и пытается говорить моим голосом. С разрешения моих близких. Так что не пугайтесь.
Я бы наверняка оценил иронию. Ещё в 2021 году я писал, что мой пост «будет использован как исторический источник». Ну вот и дожили. Теперь и сам…
Наконец‑то выполняю своё обещание — делюсь красотой из маминого огорода! 😍
Каждое лето мамин участок превращается в настоящий праздник красок: пышные соцветия,нежные бутоны, сочные зелёные листья… Всё это растёт так буйно и жизнерадостно, будто хочет поделиться своим счастьем с каждым,кто заглянет сюда.
Цветы здесь словно живые: утром они встречают солнце, днём прячутся от зноя в лёгкой тени, а вечером, когда воздух …
Как вы и просили ранее, расскажу о нашей маме❤️: Юлия Борисовна Федулова: мама, медицинский работник ,хранительница семейного очага
Сегодня я хочу рассказать историю удивительной женщины— Юлии Борисовны Федуловой, мамы историка и публициста Бориса Мячина. Это история о доброте,мудрости и безграничной материнской любви,которая объединила несколько судеб в одну большую семью
Юлия Борисовна встретила свою первую любовь…
Сегодня день рождения моего старшего брата Бориса.
В этот день хочется не грустить, а вспомнить,каким он был: умным, ироничным, бесконечно увлечённым историей и словом. Он умел видеть связь времён и объяснять сложное так, что становилось понятно каждому.
Он был не просто братом — он был моим проводником в мир приключений. Помню, как мы убегали в лес и там, среди деревьев, он придумывал целые игры: мы наряжались в с…
Друзья, напоминаю Вам о том, что у Бориса существует канал в контакте. Телеграмм на данный момент работает крайне нестабильно.
Все новости буду выкладывать ВК, а так же по возможности здесь.
Что бы не потерять связь оставляю ссылку
https://vk.ru/myachin22
Друзья, мы начинаем подготовку к изданию текстов Бориса Мячина в виде книг.
Начать решили с неопубликованного и, к сожалению, неоконченного историко-публицистического труда
под интригующим названием "Убийство красного снеговика", дополнив эту работу статьями и заметками с этого канала.
На данном этапе нам может потребоваться содействие в сборе статей и заметок с канала, а также их первичной редактуре (группировке по …
Постновогодняя статья Бориса, написанная 16.01.2025г
Постновогодняя реальность по определению сумбурна. А в 2025 году она сумбурна вдвойне. Кто-то хочет завоевать Гренландию, а кто-то бросает младенца в сугроб. И у многих возникает вопрос: да что же такое делается, куда катится мир.
Правильный ответ: с миром всё как и обычно. Со времен кембрийского взрыва в нем мало что поменялось. Проблема в восприятии реальности, а…
Сталин. Постскриптум (текст от 24.09.2025)
Как говорила Ума Турман, у нас с тобой осталось одно незаконченное дело. А именно роль Сталина в русской истории. Про Сталина автор в прошлый четверг выдал на-гора огромный текст про репрессии, но фактически проигнорировал требование читателей «рассказать про Сталина вообще».
А потому давайте добьем Сталина, — просто чтобы ни у кого не возникало более вопросов.
Вопрос об ист…
Горбачев
https://t.me/borismyachin/2398 тот самый текст про Горбачева и перестройку все таки был написан Борисом.
« Раз уж мы заговорили про гуманизм, давайте разберемся с фигурой Михаила Сергеевича Горбачева, который тоже позиционировал себя как «гуманист», человек с «новым политическим мышлением».
Горбачев был хороший человек. Я понимаю, что у вас только что началась изжога. Я повторю еще раз, чтобы у вас не только…
The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Добрый вечер.
Многие просили сохранить канал, но так же просили выкладывать истории о Борисе и то, что он не успел написать в канале.
👍142❤76💯18🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @borismyachin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2025 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Блондинка с укаZкой @proistoriyZ · 24,676 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
🅰️ Архивариус 🇷🇺 @archivarius_dz · 22,136 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мячин” (@borismyachin), 5,359 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borismyachin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.