Вообще этот текст стоило бы прибить гвоздём к дверям целого ряда профильных заведений (ну, как Мартин Лютер в 1517-м).
❤5👍1🔥1

Channel
@borisovinmedia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,092subscribers
-196 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002411049020 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @borisovinmedia |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/borisovinmedia |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 1,092 | -14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 1,106 | -11 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 1,117 | -16 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 1,133 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:05 | 1,144 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 1,156 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 1,162 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 1,175 | -26 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 1,201 | -21 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 1,222 | -20 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 1,242 | -23 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 1,265 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 1,284 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 1,288 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
187 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 65 | 34.8% | |
| ❤ | 44 | 23.5% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 20.3% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5188208446461188962 | 12 | 6.42% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 2.67% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 2.14% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.535% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.535% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @borisovinmedia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вообще этот текст стоило бы прибить гвоздём к дверям целого ряда профильных заведений (ну, как Мартин Лютер в 1517-м).
❤5👍1🔥1
На самом деле идея-то очень крутая. Это не просто «лепи любой шрифт», а именно набор пар. Пар - 80 и они максимально контрастные по стилю (верхний и нижний). В перспективе это просто огромная возможность для… коллекционирования мерча. А они будут играть с шрифтами под выставки и события. Итог: многократный возврат в воронку продаж)
👍3❤1
А вы заметили, как у нас незаметно выработалась коллективная «нейрослопная слепота»? Это такая продвинутая разновидность классической «баннерной слепоты», когда аудитория за доли секунды считывает мусорный контент и перестает видеть его в упор. Сториз, рекламные баннеры, музыка, продающие тексты и прочие результаты исскуственноинтеллектуальной деятельности (РИИД) стали настолько эффективно-рафинированными, что угады…
❤3👍3custom 51882084464611889623
Сидел сегодня на лавочке с ноутбуком после работы и смотрел на реку. Есть у меня такая странная привычка: шоссе предпочитать переулки, переулкам предпочитать дорогу через парк, а парку – дорогу вдоль набережной. Но не об этом пост. А пост о том, что наблюдая за мерцающей в предзакатных лучах «золотого часа» рябью Москвы-реки, я понял что среди моих старых друзей пиарщиков почти не осталось… пиарщиков. Более 10 уважа…
❤9👍7🔥5custom 51882084464611889622
Похоже я всё таки научусь играть на гитаре) P.S. Кстати, те кто хотел научится играть на пианино, но в детстве было лень, рекомендую умное пианино The One. Юзаю с дочкой уже год и доволен как слон)
🔥4❤1
#воскресноечтиво Занимательное интервью с живым классиком китайской научной фантастики. Рекомендую. P.S. Только не смотри экранизацию Netflix. Это не то что хотел сказать Лю Цысинь
🔥6❤2👍2
451° по Anthropic
🤯4🔥2😭1
Пост ко дню пиарщика Шёл на днях по набережной со стороны Яузы. Свернул на Земляной Вал и упёрся в кусок Берлинской стены. Настоящий. Расписан, в бетоне пробита дыра, в дыру летят бабочки. Смотрю, а в голове неловкая ассоциация про профессию, которую в этом сезоне опять хоронят. Пиар вообще штука эфимерная, а в эпоху тотальной цифровизации, так вообще физических артифактов почти не оставляющая. Заявления, посты, ре…
🔥8👍4❤2
В бизнесе есть устоявшиеся сокращения: SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time‑bound) – акцент на чёткости и сроках. HD‑RW‑RM (Header, Description, Result, Way, Redline, Motivation) – описание, результат, путь, срок и мотивация. PDATS (Problem - Task - Action - Responsible - Time). Только сегодня понял почему классический метод постановки задач не имеет в русском языке аббревиатуры/сокращения. Пр…
🔥7😁5❤2
Душевная история дизайнера Алисы Макаровой попалась тут мне на просторах интернета. И это прям хрестоматийный пример системного отставания вузов от задач бизнеса.
❤14🔥10👍8👎5
Немного цифр из мира вайбкодинга. 500–1500 токенов – таков диапазон для стандартного ответа на типичный запрос с решением домашки или рецепта. До 4000–8000 токенов – это уже среднестатистический объём сгенерированного отчёта или объёмного текста в ИИшке. Свыше 8000 токенов – такой размер возможен для сложных, детализированных ответов на платной подписке (в режиме запросов в одном окне). Выше принтскрин вечернего …
🔥4😁2👍1
Меня сейчас порвут на тысячу маленьких медвежат специалисты по шрифтам и брендингу… но я один вижу в новом шрифте Coca-Cola классический шрифт Marlboro?)
🔥4😁4👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @borisovinmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сказал Борисов” (@borisovinmedia), 1,092 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borisovinmedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.