جایزه ها تحویل داده شد ، به زودی جایزه ها بیشتر میشه
❤2

Channel
@bot4what
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
71subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001356554733 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bot4what |
| Created | 26 September 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bot4what |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 71 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 72 | +5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 67 | +5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 62 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 62 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 26 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (26 September 2022 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 836 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
28 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 82.1% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2022 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
جایزه ها تحویل داده شد ، به زودی جایزه ها بیشتر میشه
❤2
این پایین تاس بندازید اولین و دومین نفری که ۶ بیارن ، هر نفر دو تا شانس داره ، یه تدی هم جایزه هر برندست
⭐️ https://t.me/giftstarsin?start=check_53IQKUBuXqYy سه استارز واسه بازی میده بزنید ، برسونیدش شصت استارز برداشت کنید . تموم شد ❌
❤2
#edgegift خب بریم یه ترفند هم از edge بگم برای کسایی که اک زیاد دارن ، شما میتونید هر روز تسک و کیس فری رو بزنید و سیلور جمع کنید ، با اونا میتونید برید arena بازی کنید و گلد بدست بیارید ، با گلد ها هم میتونید شانستون رو برای گرفتن nft امتحان کنید یا اینکه تدی و قلب و .. غیر قابل تبدیل بگیرید . عکس اکانت خودم هم گذاشتم .
#edgegift این رباته هم که گیفت میده با پنج تا رفرال اگه گیفتتون رو انتقال بدید بین اکانتا و اونو رفرال خودتون کنید حساب میکنه ، مثلا گیفتو انتقال بدید از اکانت A به B بعدش ۲۵ استارز بدید و انتقال بدید اک بعدی و در اخر بزنید به خودتون ، ۱۵۰ استارز اینا هزینه برمیداره گیفتی که میده ۳۵۰ استارز به بالاست مسئولیت قبول نمیکنم ممکنه یهو گیفتو نده یا .. ولی یکی از دوستان انجام داد و شد 👍
❤1
رباتستان pinned «تو این چنل ، باگ ها ، کلاه برداری ها ، و تمام نکات مربوط به ربات های قمار تلگرام گفته میشه ، شاید تونستی پول هم در بیاری کسی چه میدونه 👍 من خودم تا حالا تقریبا از تمام ربات ها باگ پیدا کردم و زیر و بم همشون رو میدونم ، هم بازی کردم داخلشون هم چون یه مقدار…»
Posted without readable text
بعضی ها داخل ویروس یه مقداری استارز جمع کردن حالا از اسپین یا به هر نحو دیگه ای ولی وقتی میرن بازی کنن بازی هاش ارور میده که فلان قدر واریز کن و اون مقدار زیاده و نمیصرفه ، چیکار میتونی بکنی ، یه مقدار کم واریز میکنی ، ( بعضی وقت ها بدون واریز هم میشه ) صبر میکنی تا چند مدت بعد که یهو بهت بونوس داد ، ۵۰ استارز حدودا میده ، اون موقع میتونی همه بازی هاشو تا ۴۸ ساعت انجام بدی و بدون شرط برداشت کنی ، حتی میتونی بری داخ…
❤2💘2
#virus ربات ویروس که الان همه باهاش آشنایید سر این مسخره بازی جدیدش که گیفت میده با رفرال ، یه نیمچه باگی داره اونم سر محاسبه قیمت استارزشه ، تو تصویر میبینید که مثلا ۲۲۰ استارز رو میده ۱.۸۶ در حالی که ۱.۸۶ تون الان ۲.۷ دلاره و ۲۲۰ استارز ۳.۳ دلار ، حالا قیمت تون پایین ترم که بیاد باز همین نرخ ۱.۸۶ رو حساب میکنه ، اصلا روش های دیگش به صرفه نیستن فعلا ، الانم که تدی تروریست اومده با قیمت پنجاه استارز ازش میتونید بگی…
❤3👍3
#epic اولین رباتی که میخوام یه سری اطلاعات راجع بهش بهتون بگم ربات اپیکه چون خیلی معروفه ، این بی شرف اصن باگ نمیشه ، درصد ایتم هایی که میده داخل کیس هاش هم با توجه به تغییرات قیمت تغییر میکنه ، یعنی مثلا من دیدم قیمت کیس اسنوپ ،۵ تون بود ، بدترین ایتم کیس ۴.۹۵ بود ، ولی هرچییی زدم همون سگ اسنوپ رو داد و در نهایت ضرر میشد ، این نکته اول ، سمت فارم کیسشم نرید که خیلی ریسکیه ، من نزدیک پنجاه تون زدم داخلش حتی یک ایتم …
❤7
تو این چنل ، باگ ها ، کلاه برداری ها ، و تمام نکات مربوط به ربات های قمار تلگرام گفته میشه ، شاید تونستی پول هم در بیاری کسی چه میدونه 👍 من خودم تا حالا تقریبا از تمام ربات ها باگ پیدا کردم و زیر و بم همشون رو میدونم ، هم بازی کردم داخلشون هم چون یه مقدار برنامه نویسی میدونم کد هاشونو دیدم ، درصد کیس هاشون و .. چنلو دنبال کن پولتو از دست نده جاش پول بدست بیار 🙏
❤6
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @bot4what. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رباتستان” (@bot4what), 71 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bot4what.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.