Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Boxing.teacher

Channel

Boxing.teacher

@boxingteache

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,237subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001793845461
TypeChannel
Username@boxingteache
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/boxingteache

Growth

5,2185,2505,2347 August 2026 — 5,218 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,218 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,219 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,235 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,230 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,237 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,238 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,240 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,250 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,237 subscribers5,2377 August 20262 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 26 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,213–5,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 06:585,237-13
30 Aug 2026, 00:165,250+10
27 Aug 2026, 02:535,240+2
23 Aug 2026, 22:585,238+1
20 Aug 2026, 05:545,237+7
17 Aug 2026, 12:535,230-5
14 Aug 2026, 14:175,235+16
11 Aug 2026, 05:445,219+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:455,218no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:365,218first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 18m
Average length
7m 09s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,314 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍51339.0%
🔥48837.1%
937.08%
👏685.18%
👌453.42%
👎453.42%
🤬231.75%
141.07%
🙏90.685%
🏆80.609%
❤‍🔥20.152%
💯20.152%
🥴20.152%
😱10.076%
🤣10.076%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,314 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2024 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @boxingteache. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 November 2024 to 27 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2026, 11:17 UTC≈2,100 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚀 NartVPN — современный VPN для комфортного интернета без ограничений. ✅ YouTube без рекламы ✅ Telegram, сайты и сервисы без ограничений ✅ Ozon, Wildberries, VK, Сбербанк и другие приложения работают без необходимости отключать VPN ✅ Умная нода «Авто + YouTube» — автоматически выбирает оптимальный маршрут и отключает рекламу в YouTube ✅ Высокая скорость и стабильное соединение ✅ Простая установка и подключение за па

🔥62👏1

Signed Батик

23 Feb 2025, 08:36 UTC≈14,200 views80 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кто смотрел бой друзья? Ваше мнение?

🔥69👍92

Signed Батик

23 Feb 2025, 08:36 UTC≈13,900 views71 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @tv_boxingVideo

Дмитрий Бивол vs Артур Бетербиев ПОЛНЫЙ БОЙ Бокс Тв🥊 - Подписывайся

👍44🔥225

Signed Батик

22 Feb 2025, 21:21 UTC≈13,400 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Друзья, бокс будут транслировать по 1 каналу 00:45 по Москве

👍15👏52

Signed Батик

14 Feb 2025, 09:29 UTC≈12,900 views114 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Менни Пакьяо великий человек и чемпион. Как говорится, смеется тот, кто смеется последним Ко всем надо относиться с уважением, особенно к старшим и тренерам

🔥87👍234

Signed Батик

13 Feb 2025, 11:45 UTC≈12,200 views52 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

3-х кратный великий Олимпийский Чемпион Феликс Савон Мощная речь про Олимпийский бокс и профессиональный бокс А вы как считаете?

👍35🔥122💯2👏1

Signed Батик

28 Dec 2024, 08:08 UTC≈11,500 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Кто не прав?

  1. Рефери72%
  2. Регбист10%
  3. Имеля11%
  4. Фомич7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Батик

28 Dec 2024, 08:08 UTC≈9,840 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Всех приветствую, друзья, коллеги, спортсмены. Интересно ваше мнение, кто не прав в данной ситуации?

🤬23🔥32👍1😱1

Signed Батик

22 Dec 2024, 12:05 UTC≈9,720 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Для тех кто не смотрел бой 🥊 Нарезка лучших моментов реванша 🇺🇦 Усика и 🇬🇧 Фьюри 🔥

👍24🔥8👎4🏆32

Signed Батик

22 Dec 2024, 00:10 UTC≈8,510 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Только что в Эр-Рияде завершился реванш Тайсона Фьюри и Александра Усика, в котором Усику судьи отдали победу со счетом 116-112. Счет по раундам во время просмотра: Участники главного боя уже в ринге. Ждем объявления. 1 раунд: Фьюри начал активнее, чем в пером бою, активно действует передней рукой, целит в корпус: 10-9 Фьюри 2: Ровный раунд, Усик чуть активнее, 1-1 3: Урона практически нет, легкие удары, Усик ак

👍295🔥2👎1👏1

Signed Батик

21 Dec 2024, 23:54 UTC≈6,090 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Ну что скажете, кто победил в этом бою, ваше мнение? Мое мнение 💯 ничья!

  1. Усик71%
  2. Фьюри14%
  3. Ничья14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

Signed Батик

21 Dec 2024, 20:53 UTC≈6,500 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Кто победит в бою Усик vs Фьюри 2?

  1. Усик победа58%
  2. Фьюри победа25%
  3. Усик нокаутом победа8%
  4. Фьюри нокаутом победа4%
  5. Ничья5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

Signed Батик

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @boxingteache. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Dec 2024, 08:08 UTCAnonymous Poll657 voters

Кто не прав?

  1. Рефери72%
  2. Регбист10%
  3. Имеля11%
  4. Фомич7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Dec 2024, 23:54 UTCAnonymous Poll421 voters

Ну что скажете, кто победил в этом бою, ваше мнение? Мое мнение 💯 ничья!

  1. Усик71%
  2. Фьюри14%
  3. Ничья14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Dec 2024, 20:53 UTCAnonymous Poll557 voters

Кто победит в бою Усик vs Фьюри 2?

  1. Усик победа58%
  2. Фьюри победа25%
  3. Усик нокаутом победа8%
  4. Фьюри нокаутом победа4%
  5. Ничья5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2024 to 27 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ВСЕМ БОКС ЛАЙВ
@vsembokslive · 38,638
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Boxing.teacher” (@boxingteache), 5,237 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boxingteache.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.