Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бокс-Ту-Бокс

Channel

Бокс-Ту-Бокс

@boxtoboxvrn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

413subscribers

+74 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002375860691
TypeChannel
Username@boxtoboxvrn
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/boxtoboxvrn

Growth

339422380.57 August 2026 — 339 subscribers7 August 2026 — 339 subscribers15 August 2026 — 349 subscribers21 August 2026 — 409 subscribers27 August 2026 — 422 subscribers5 September 2026 — 413 subscribers4137 August 20265 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 29 days, net +74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 327–434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 05:17413-9
27 Aug 2026, 12:56422+13
21 Aug 2026, 08:17409+60
15 Aug 2026, 02:54349+10
7 Aug 2026, 06:17339no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:02339first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

356 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12134.0%
👍8122.8%
👏5615.7%
5014.0%
custom 5436011373492470626246.74%
👌61.69%
💯61.69%
🥰41.12%
❤‍🔥30.843%
custom 531219667905364129820.562%
🤝20.562%
🤔10.281%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 356 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
43
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 19 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @boxtoboxvrn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC118 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Продвинутая статистика «Факел» — «Динамо» Дополню стандартную статистику некоторыми продвинутыми показателями, в том числе фитнес-метриками, с разбивкой по таймам: Владение мячом • 1 тайм: «Факел» — 41% «Динамо» — 59% • 2 тайм: «Факел» — 35% «Динамо» — 65% Атаки/с ударами • 1 тайм: «Факел» — 37/2 «Динамо» — 45/9 • 2 тайм: «Факел» — 36/3 «Динамо» — 50/7 Единоборства • 1 тайм: «Факел» — 81/34 «Динамо» — 8

👍72🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC159 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Итоги матча «Факел» — «Динамо» Обидное поражение «Факела» в первом кубковом матче после автогола Юрганова на 2-й добавленной минуте. Очень кратко выделю несколько тезисов по кубковой игре: • «Факел» начал игру в привычной схеме 3-5-2, комбинируя в позиционной обороне 5-3-2/4-4-2 в среднем/низком блоке, практически отказавшись от высокого прессинга. Выход из обороны также выглядел привычно — длинные передачи в напр

🔥127custom 54360113734924706264👍3

5 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC591 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Cостав на матч «Факел» — «Динамо» На кубковый матч против «Динамо» тренерский штаб ожидаемо проводит масштабную ротацию, что значительно усложняет задачу по определению стартовой формации. Особенно в контексте перестроений команды во втором тайме в матче против «Краснодара». Одновременное появление в стартовом составе Юрия Журавлева и Матвея Бардачева может намекать на переход к схеме 4-4-2. При этом нельзя исключа

🔥5custom 543601137349247062632

5 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC169 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Турищев против «Краснодара» 🥇Забитые голы — 1 🥈ТТД в штрафной/удачные — 4/2 🥈Единоборства в атаке/удачные — 8/4 🥈Удары/в створ — 2/1 🥈Обводки/удачные — 1/1 🥉xG — 0.17 Поддержать проект: Tribute | Donation Alerts | Boosty Бокс-Ту-Бокс

👍92🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC172 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Гиоргобиани против «Краснодара» 🥇Голевые передачи — 1 🥇ТТД в штрафной/удачные — 4/3 🥇Передачи в финальную треть/точные — 24/19 🥇Передачи в штрафную/точные — 7/3 🥇Единоборства в атаке/удачные — 11/6 🥈Заработанные фолы — 2 🥈Входы в финальную треть через продвижение — 2 🥈Единоборства внизу/удачные — 12/7 🥈Количество рывков и спринтов — 58 🥉Подборы/на чужой половине — 3/2 🥉Единоборства/удачные — 14/7 🥉Перехваты/на чужой

🔥7👌4custom 543601137349247062631👍1

5 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC164 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Запись стрима Обсудили со Стасом из ФКФВ поражение «Факела» в матче против «Краснодара», перфоманс и незабитый пенальти Гнапи, а также трансфер Эль-Мхассани и предстоящие матчи против «Динамо» и «Ахмата». Спасибо всем за активность в чате и донаты! Запись доступна по ссылкам: 📺 YouTube 📺 VK Буду благодарен вашим лайкам, комментариям и подпискам на удобной для вас платформе для дальнейшего продвижения видео! Под

🔥12👍5🥰4👌21

4 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC169 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нетфуллин против «Краснодара» 🥇Входы в финальную треть — 6 🥇Точность передач — 90% (42/38) 🥇Передачи в одно касание/точные — 24/22 🥇Перехваты/на чужой половине — 9/4 🥇Передачи в штрафную/точные — 4/3 🥈Единоборства в атаке/удачные — 8/4 🥈Передачи вперед/точные — 21/18 🥈Передачи длинные/точные — 3/3 🥈Отборы/удачные — 3/2 🥈Возвраты/на чужой половине — 8/2 🥈Общая дистанция, м — 10743 🥈Количество ускорений — 101 🥈Количес

🔥8👍6custom 54360113734924706263

4 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTCviews —

Бокс-Ту-Бокс pinned «Бокс-Ту-Бокс × ФКФВ стрим Всем привет! Завтра в 20:00 (ВРН) вместе со Стасом из ФКФВ проведем стрим по итогам матча против «Краснодара». Обсудим: • Матч-план и выбор стартового состава • Общекомандные и индивидуальный перфоманс игроков «Факела» • Структурные…»

4 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC189 views33 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

Разбор двух пропущенных голов «Факела» в матче против «Краснодара» Как обещал ранее, выкладываю разбор второго и третьего пропущенных голов «Факела» в матче против «Краснодара». В этот раз основные тезисы вынесены в сам разбор для вашего удобства. Как видно на GIF, помимо индивидуальных ошибок, у обоих пропущенных голов есть общий паттерн, а именно — нарушение баланса и несогласованные действия игроков центра поля

👍16👏7🔥7custom 54360113734924706263

4 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC128 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fakelonvrn36Photo

🔥 ВЫИГРАЙ ФУТБОЛКУ «МЫ СТОЛИЦА ЧЕРНОЗЕМЬЯ» «Факел» возвращает большой футбол в столицу Черноземья во второй раз за 25 лет — Воронеж снова будет жить РПЛ. Чтобы оставить себе частичку этого события и новой главы «Факела» — разыгрываем футболку. Как выиграть? 1. Подписаться на «Только Факел. «Факел» Воронеж» 2. Подписаться на «Сквозь Туман | ВРФ» 3. Подписаться на «Воспитанник Спортса» 🤞 Итоги розыгрыша будут по

custom 543601137349247062632

3 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC604 views19 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Бокс-Ту-Бокс × ФКФВ стрим Всем привет! Завтра в 20:00 (ВРН) вместе со Стасом из ФКФВ проведем стрим по итогам матча против «Краснодара». Обсудим: • Матч-план и выбор стартового состава • Общекомандные и индивидуальный перфоманс игроков «Факела» • Структурные и индивидуальные ошибки в эпизодах с двумя пропущенными голами • Матч-менеджмент и переход на схему с четырьмя защитниками • Ожидания от матчей против «Динам

👏113❤‍🔥2custom 53121966790536412982🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC449 views26 reactions12 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ходейфа Эль-Мхассани — игрок «Факела» «Факел» подписал контракт по схеме «2+1» с 26-летним латералем. Последние два сезона Эль-Мхассани выступал за марокканский «ФУС-Рабат», где был практически бессменным игроком стартового состава. В прошедшем сезоне на счету латераля 2163 минуты в чемпионате и 3+1 по системе «гол+пас». Эль-Мхассани — правоногий крайний защитник/латераль, также уверенно владеющий и левой ногой. И

🔥14👏83👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @boxtoboxvrn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTCFinal Results89 voters

Лучший игрок «Факела», вышедший на замену в матче против «Краснодара»

  1. Турищев69%
  2. Ковалев1%
  3. Пуси10%
  4. Багамаев1%
  5. Сутормин19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бокс-Ту-Бокс” (@boxtoboxvrn), 413 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boxtoboxvrn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.