Стартапер из Пакистана решил лично показать, как работает его технология беспилотного управления авто, но что-то пошло не так. Разработчик рассказывал о возможностях системы, но спустя несколько секунд тачка врезалась в полицейскую машину. Первый блин комом. 💢 Больше эксклюзивов в нашем канале МАХ

Channel
Брянский Водитель
@br_auto32
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,845subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001524010179 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @br_auto32 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/br_auto32 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:04 | 11,845 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:07 | 11,846 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 11,848 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 11,859 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 11,858 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 11,859 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 11,860 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 11,861 | +12 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 11,849 | +13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 11,836 | -37 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 11,873 | +5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 11,868 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 11,876 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 11,883 | +6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 11,877 | +10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 11,867 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 11,864 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 11,861 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 11,857 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 11,860 | first reading |
Engagement
357 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.19%
- avg views ÷ 11,845 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 259
- 357 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.544%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 357
- of 357 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 126 of 357 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 357 (6 August 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 92,586 |
| Reactions total | 189 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 17:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1h 30m
- Average length
- 36s
Measured directly from 150 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
189 reactions across 115 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 32 | 16.9% | |
| 🍌 | 24 | 12.7% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 6.88% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 5.82% | |
| 🏆 | 10 | 5.29% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 5.29% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 4.76% | |
| 🤮 | 8 | 4.23% | |
| 😡 | 6 | 3.17% | |
| 😨 | 6 | 3.17% | |
| 🤬 | 6 | 3.17% | |
| 🙉 | 5 | 2.65% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 1.59% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 1.59% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.59% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.59% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 1.06% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.06% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 1.06% | |
| 10 further kinds | 10 | 5.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 126 of the 357 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 357 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.56%
- 2 of 357 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 2
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 212
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 267
- over 355 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 82XWrD8mZVYXtierN96mjHXi4EE | 2 | 23 August 2026 | 24 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 357 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Последний день на работе 💢 Больше эксклюзивов в нашем канале МАХ
Posted without readable text
Ремонт улицы Деснянской в Сельцо вышел на финальную стадию Капитальный ремонт улицы Деснянской в городе Сельцо Брянской области завершается. После смены подрядчика работы ведутся без простоев и в соответствии с графиком. Ранее жители неоднократно жаловались на состояние дороги и задержки сроков. Чтобы наверстать отставание, подрядчика заменили. Сейчас дорожники подготовили основание, обустроили обочины и уложили н…
Дорогие наши близкие! Собрано 36.163 рублей из 150.000 рублей ❤️❤️❤️ Каждые 50-100-200-500 рублей спасают жизнь! Просим проявить активность и принять участие в сборе: https://pay.cloudtips.ru/p/b663d933 Для тех, кто боится переходить по ссылке, то мы прилагаем номер карты для перевода: 5536913911894653 (Т- Банк, Павел Ч.)
В Брянской области за сутки не произошло ДТП с пострадавшими За минувшие сутки, 31 августа, на территории Брянской области не зарегистрировано дорожно-транспортных происшествий с пострадавшими, сообщили в ГАИ. В авариях повреждения получили только автомобили. ДТП оформлялись как по европротоколу, так и с участием сотрудников ДПС. Ведомство призвало водителей, пешеходов, велосипедистов и мотоциклистов соблюдать ПДД,…
Лесники привели в порядок территорию на границе Брянской и Калужской областей Сотрудники Ивотского лесничества благоустроили придорожную полосу трассы Брянск — Дятьково — Людиново: скосили траву, убрали кустарник, древесный отпад и мусор, отремонтировали лесную мебель и указатели. Теперь участок вновь готов стать местом отдыха автомобилистов. 💢 Больше эксклюзивов в нашем канале МАХ
❤3
Берем на заметку 💢 Больше эксклюзивов в нашем канале МАХ
Водителям разрешат предъявлять права и СТС через «MAX» наравне с бумажными документами, сообщили в Минцифры Полностью переходить на электронный формат не потребуется — цифровые документы останутся добровольными. 💢 Больше эксклюзивов в нашем канале МАХ
Posted without readable text
На российских заправках снова разрешили продавать топливо классов Евро-2, Евро-3 и Евро-4 — послабление будет действовать до 30 июня 2027 года Раньше НПЗ могли поставлять такой бензин и дизель только по внутренним контрактам, теперь ограничение сняли. Топливо можно будет продавать на АЗС на обычных условиях. При этом заправки обязали указывать экологический класс прямо на колонке, чтобы водитель сразу видел, что и…
🏆1
На заправке произошел очередной вумен-момент Кстати, интересный факт, женский мозг более развит 💢 Больше эксклюзивов в нашем канале МАХ
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 357 posts we hold for @br_auto32. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,376,044 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@br_gorod · 93,801
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 16 August 2026
@bra_32 · 41,655
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 29 August 2026
@bryansk_smi · 73,516
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 19 August 2026
@tipicl32 · 158,976
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 14 August 2026
@bryansk_off32 · 59,845
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
@tipical32 · 46,595
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 27 August 2026
@barakholka32 · 64,290
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Брянский Водитель” (@br_auto32), 11,845 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/br_auto32.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.