Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🤍

Channel

🤍

@bragiinss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

219subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001916869059
TypeChannel
Username@bragiinss
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bragiinss

Growth

21930 Aug 2026, 15:31 — 219 subscribers30 Aug 2026, 15:53 — 219 subscribers30 Aug 2026, 15:3130 Aug 2026, 15:53
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 218–220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 15:53219no change
30 Aug 2026, 15:31219first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 27s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

395 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18847.6%
❤‍🔥4711.9%
custom 53259349565835971874411.1%
custom 5244680854017423444379.37%
🍓174.30%
💔174.30%
💯133.29%
💘123.04%
🔥102.53%
💊30.759%
🕊30.759%
💅20.506%
🐳10.253%
💋10.253%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 395 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2025 to 4 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jan 2026, 10:23 UTC331 viewsread 30 August 2026

https://t.me/FanMarishaa Вернулась)

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆

18 Oct 2025, 15:59 UTC476 views13 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @FanMarishaaVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

13

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆

1 Oct 2025, 17:36 UTC535 viewsread 30 August 2026

https://t.me/FanMarishaa Напоминаю

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆

18 Aug 2025, 15:30 UTC593 views6 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

6

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆

9 Aug 2025, 18:52 UTC495 views26 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @FanMarishaaVideo

Ты любовь моя... Я без тебя никто #МарияКуликова #Склиф #брагины

17🍓4🕊2💯1custom 52446808540174234441custom 53259349565835971871

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆

6 Aug 2025, 22:27 UTC785 viewsread 30 August 2026

https://t.me/FanMarishaa Напоминаю

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆

14 Jul 2025, 14:56 UTC791 views14 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Я создала другой канал. Чтобы там не было "лишних' акков. Переходите кто действительно хочет следить за моими видео) https://t.me/FanMarishaa

❤‍🔥9🍓2custom 52446808540174234442custom 53259349565835971871

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆

13 Jul 2025, 21:32 UTC658 views23 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Как вам идея создать новый канал,и перейти туда? Просто я сейчас посмотрела статистику,и там только у 28% включены уведомления. То есть,больше половины людей почти не следят за каналом. Ну и зачем мне это? Проще создать новый,и кому интересен мой контент тот и перейдет туда. Что думайте по этому поводу?

💯126🍓3❤‍🔥2

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆

13 Jul 2025, 18:08 UTC768 views42 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Вы только посмотрите на эти глазки 🥹

25❤‍🔥8custom 53259349565835971875custom 52446808540174234443🍓1

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆

13 Jul 2025, 15:25 UTC363 viewsread 30 August 2026

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSHgkKJurxTor-4piRx/ Новое видео в тиктоке подъехало)

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆

12 Jul 2025, 15:05 UTC337 views17 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Аккаунт абсолютно новый. Был создан вчера. Я не думала, что там будут залетать самые первые видео. Но ТТ умеет удивлять😊 Ссылочка: https://www.tiktok.com/@fan_marisha_?_t=ZM-8xy87Lpu3q4&_r=1

10custom 53259349565835971874custom 52446808540174234443

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆

12 Jul 2025, 15:04 UTC450 views20 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Бешеный актив чуть больше чем за сутки. Я в шоке 🥹

16custom 52446808540174234442custom 53259349565835971872

Signed 𝕻𝖔𝖑𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @bragiinss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

СМОТРИМ
@smotrim_ru · 39,846
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🤍” (@bragiinss), 219 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bragiinss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.