Local community β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 90 days, net +252. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 11,016β12,154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 10:57
11,400
-52
3 Nov 2026, 09:17
11,452
+97
2 Nov 2026, 06:07
11,355
-23
1 Nov 2026, 09:09
11,378
-52
31 Oct 2026, 09:55
11,430
-28
30 Oct 2026, 09:49
11,458
-97
29 Oct 2026, 07:55
11,555
+35
28 Oct 2026, 03:10
11,520
+46
27 Oct 2026, 03:18
11,474
-79
26 Oct 2026, 05:05
11,553
-138
25 Oct 2026, 05:30
11,691
-161
24 Oct 2026, 02:17
11,852
-171
22 Oct 2026, 23:54
12,023
+353
21 Oct 2026, 22:41
11,670
+355
20 Oct 2026, 20:10
11,315
-22
19 Oct 2026, 16:46
11,337
-29
18 Oct 2026, 16:16
11,366
-70
17 Oct 2026, 14:19
11,436
-85
16 Oct 2026, 13:46
11,521
-96
15 Oct 2026, 12:40
11,617
first reading
Engagement
130 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
16.7%
avg views Γ· 11,400 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,900
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.58%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 130 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
130 (2 August 2026 β 3 November 2026)
Views total
40,000
Reactions total
966
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 07:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 43m
Average length
3m 20s
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
5,634 reactions across 103 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
β€
1,605
28.5%
π
1,363
24.2%
π
1,296
23.0%
π
1,284
22.8%
π―
13
0.231%
πΎ
9
0.16%
β‘
8
0.142%
π
8
0.142%
π€
8
0.142%
customΒ 5413825479406789631
7
0.124%
π
6
0.106%
β€βπ₯
5
0.089%
π
3
0.053%
π
3
0.053%
π±
3
0.053%
π€¬
3
0.053%
π
2
0.035%
π
2
0.035%
π€
2
0.035%
π
1
0.018%
3 further kinds
3
0.053%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 104 of the 130 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 5,634 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 130 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 126 we hold a reading for Β· 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @braiden_channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 130 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegramβs own βeditedβ marker: 2 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (9.52%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#braiden_services β2407
π’ OBTAINING A RESIDENCE PERMIT IN RUSSIA FOR A MINOR CHILD
A residence permit (VNZh) is a separate indefinite document (a blue passport) that confirms permanent residence in Russia.
β‘οΈ This service is relevant for the following foreign nationals:
1. A foreign national who already holds an RP in Russia and has a child born in Russia who needs to obtain an RP;
2. A foreign national who aβ¦
#resettlement β2406
π’ Pskov Region's model for integrating compatriots recognized as one of the most effective in Russia π·πΊ
At the World Thematic Conference of Russian Compatriots, held in Moscow on October 28-29, 2026, the Pskov Region's approach to supporting and integrating compatriots returning to Russia received high praise.
According to Pskov Region Governor Mikhail Vedernikov, the region's practices were reβ¦
We would like to remind you that new amendments to the law regarding the deportation of foreign nationals will take effect tomorrow. In August, the list of administrative violations subject to deportation was expanded.
Details: https://t.me/braiden_channel/4870
β‘οΈ Our help does not end with obtaining a Temporary Residence Permit (TRP) or a Residence Permit (VNZh)!
Moving to another country is not just about processing migration documents.
After obtaining residency, foreigners face many new tasks: from annual notifications and tax issues to opening a business, renting housing, and organizing finances.
That is why our team offers a comprehensive range of services that help β¦
Braiden Cases ‴οΈβ€΄οΈ
#braiden_cases β2405
π¨π¦ Case: Successful submission of the first annual notification for a Temporary Residence Permit (TRP) in Saint Petersburg
Hello everyone!π
We are starting the new work week with another successful case! This time, we helped our client from Canada fulfill an important migration obligation - submit the first annual notification confirming residence in Russia under an TRP.
Wβ¦
Good morning βοΈ
The Braiden team has had a good rest and is already back to work!
If you need a free consultation, post your questions in this chat or send a direct message to our specialist @braiden_support
We wish everyone a productive work week πͺ
π News (October):
βοΈ Online webinar on renting residential property in Russia for foreign citizens: practical advice, rental scam prevention, and introduction of our apartment search service in Moscow
βοΈ Russian Interior Ministry representative participates in UN refugee meeting in Geneva
βοΈ Russia introduces updated consular fees for visas from October 14, 2026
βοΈ Russia updates the list of territories with resβ¦
#braiden_news β2404
π’ OUR OCTOBER 2026 RECAP
Dear friends, summer is already here βοΈ
In October 2026, we published a wide range of useful content on migration and legal matters in Russia.
For your convenience, weβve gathered all key posts from last month below π
π Cases (October):
βοΈ Successful obtaining of a Temporary Residence Permit (TRP) under the Shared Values Program for our client from Italy
βοΈ Successβ¦
#braiden_answers β2403
β I have a Temporary Residence Permit (TRP) obtained in Krasnodar. Do I need to obtain a work permit to start working?
π Our answer:
According to the law, foreign citizens who have a TRP in Russia have the right to engage in labor activity without the need to obtain a work permit.
You can officially work in the region where the TRP was issued. That is, you can officially work not only in thβ¦
π π π π π π π π π
βοΈ Friends
β’ Today is the Russian language class with Yulia for absolute beginners
β’ At 17:00 (Moscow time)
Before entering the lesson, turn off the microphone and enter your real name. This will help the teacher to conduct the lesson normally.
γ°οΈγ°οΈγ°οΈγ°οΈγ°οΈγ°οΈγ°οΈγ°οΈγ°οΈγ°οΈγ°οΈ
πͺ Please set yourself a reminder of our lessons and try not to be late. Lessons will not be recorded.
π Do not forget to turn off yourβ¦
Friends, have an awesome weekend everyone π
If you have any questions, write them in our chat or private messages.
On Monday, we will process everything and give you feedback.
This week, the Russia-Africa Economic and Humanitarian Forum took place in Moscow on October 28-29, bringing together representatives of Russia and African countries to discuss economic cooperation, international relations and cultural ties.β¦
π22β€21π12π8π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 130 posts we hold for @braiden_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@braiden_channel edited 3 posts after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @braiden_channel as deleted β posts this register held that were missing from the channelβs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelβs public page, and when β not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 6 most recent of 24 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
π¬ If you used another method, write it in the comments. You can also share which housing search method you consider most convenient for a foreigner.
Through friends / acquaintances27%
Through a realtor or real estate agency14%
Through a classifieds website (CIAN, Avito, etc.)39%
Through Telegram / social networks4%
Through relatives / partner8%
By another method9%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
π¬ You can also write in the comments which factor is most important to you.
Rent cost54%
Proximity to the metro / public transport48%
Proximity to work or study32%
Size and condition of the apartment48%
Possibility to obtain registration61%
Shops, schools, and other infrastructure nearby29%
Quietness and comfort of the neighborhood38%
Your own option in the comments4%
The shares total 314%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
βQuestion 4. What problems did you encounter when searching for or renting housing?
High rent cost35%
Owners do not want to rent to a foreigner59%
Difficulties with registration at the place of stay66%
High realtor commission26%
The apartment did not match the photos or description8%
It was difficult to find a suitable neighborhood9%
There were no serious problems11%
Your own option in the comments4%
The shares total 218%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
βQuestion 2. How much do you pay for housing rent per month?
Up to 30,000 β½14%
30,000β50,000 β½25%
50,000β80,000 β½20%
80,000β120,000 β½6%
More than 120,000 β½6%
I do not rent housing29%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 130 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
Open Doors Russian Scholarship Project @opendoorsrussianscholarship Β· 20,720 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here β alongside 92 others β read 2 October 2026
Alabuga Start Programme @AlabugaStart Β· 22,238 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 61 here β alongside 60 others β read 19 September 2026
ΠΠ£ΠΠ ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ @ufmsmsk Β· 20,250 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here β alongside 78 others β read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βLive & Do Business in Russia π·πΊβ (@braiden_channel), 11,400 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/braiden_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.