Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net +337. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,096–11,536 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 01:01
11,485
+17
16 Sept 2026, 14:59
11,468
+123
14 Sept 2026, 16:22
11,345
-116
13 Sept 2026, 05:19
11,461
+98
11 Sept 2026, 05:39
11,363
+96
8 Sept 2026, 10:15
11,267
+40
5 Sept 2026, 02:18
11,227
-6
3 Sept 2026, 10:13
11,233
+40
2 Sept 2026, 06:54
11,193
+9
1 Sept 2026, 07:48
11,184
-8
31 Aug 2026, 04:35
11,192
+2
30 Aug 2026, 07:36
11,190
-1
29 Aug 2026, 07:43
11,191
-1
28 Aug 2026, 10:17
11,192
-9
27 Aug 2026, 10:55
11,201
+6
26 Aug 2026, 11:52
11,195
-2
25 Aug 2026, 09:54
11,197
-2
24 Aug 2026, 11:53
11,199
-18
22 Aug 2026, 21:45
11,217
-5
21 Aug 2026, 15:08
11,222
first reading
Engagement
109 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 11,485 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,480
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 109 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
109 (2 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
106,800
Reactions total
1,916
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 42m
Average length
3m 56s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,668 reactions across 83 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,360
29.1%
👏
1,115
23.9%
👍
1,073
23.0%
🎉
1,054
22.6%
💯
11
0.236%
🍾
9
0.193%
🙏
8
0.171%
🤔
8
0.171%
custom 5413825479406789631
7
0.15%
🕊
6
0.129%
⚡
5
0.107%
❤🔥
5
0.107%
👎
3
0.064%
🤬
3
0.064%
👀
1
0.021%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 109 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,668 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 105 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @braiden_channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 109 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#braiden_answers №2313
❓I have a TRP and want to receive free medical care in Russia. Where should I apply for an OMS policy, how can I register with a state clinic, and is OMS required if I find official employment in the region where my TRP is issued?
📝 Our answer:
To receive free medical care at a state clinic, you first need to obtain a compulsory medical insurance policy (ОМС).
🔸 To apply for an OMS policy, …
💬 You can also write in the comments which factor is most important to you.
Rent cost54%
Proximity to the metro / public transport48%
Proximity to work or study32%
Size and condition of the apartment48%
Possibility to obtain registration61%
Shops, schools, and other infrastructure nearby29%
Quietness and comfort of the neighborhood38%
Your own option in the comments4%
The shares total 314%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❓Question 4. What problems did you encounter when searching for or renting housing?
High rent cost35%
Owners do not want to rent to a foreigner59%
Difficulties with registration at the place of stay66%
High realtor commission26%
The apartment did not match the photos or description8%
It was difficult to find a suitable neighborhood9%
There were no serious problems11%
Your own option in the comments4%
The shares total 218%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#braiden_surveys №2312
Dear friends! 👋
We invite you to take part in our new survey!
Today’s topic: Housing in Russia — where foreigners live, how much they pay, and what difficulties they face.
Finding housing is one of the first practical questions that almost everyone faces after moving to Russia.
However, the experience of foreigners can vary significantly depending on the city, type of housing, and rental co…
#braiden_services №2311
💢 Accompanying the receipt of a medical examination and fingerprinting
Over 10 cases processed weekly
➡️ Who is obliged to undergo medical examination and fingerprinting:
1. all foreign nationals who carry out labour activities in Russia on a work visa, including HQS work visas;
2. all foreign nationals who have a visa and is staying in Russia for more than 90 days, including on a bus…
#migration_news №2310
📢 New medical examination rules for foreigners take effect from September 1
Starting today, September 1, 2026, foreign citizens entering Russia on a visa or visa-free basis for a period of more than 90 days must undergo a mandatory medical examination within 30 days from the date of entry.
Previously, foreigners had 90 days to complete this requirement.
⚠️ If you are unable to complete the m…
❤17👍16👏13🎉11
Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @braiden_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@braiden_channel edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 24 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
💬 You can also write in the comments which factor is most important to you.
Rent cost54%
Proximity to the metro / public transport48%
Proximity to work or study32%
Size and condition of the apartment48%
Possibility to obtain registration61%
Shops, schools, and other infrastructure nearby29%
Quietness and comfort of the neighborhood38%
Your own option in the comments4%
The shares total 314%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❓Question 4. What problems did you encounter when searching for or renting housing?
High rent cost35%
Owners do not want to rent to a foreigner59%
Difficulties with registration at the place of stay66%
High realtor commission26%
The apartment did not match the photos or description8%
It was difficult to find a suitable neighborhood9%
There were no serious problems11%
Your own option in the comments4%
The shares total 218%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❓Question 2. How much do you pay for housing rent per month?
Up to 30,000 ₽14%
30,000–50,000 ₽25%
50,000–80,000 ₽20%
80,000–120,000 ₽6%
More than 120,000 ₽6%
I do not rent housing29%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Alabuga Start Programme @AlabugaStart · 23,034 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Live & Do Business in Russia 🇷🇺” (@braiden_channel), 11,485 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/braiden_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
