Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Brandfriend

Channel

Brandfriend

@brandfriend

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,715subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001090082551
TypeChannel
Username@brandfriend
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/brandfriend

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,7151,7221,718.56 August 2026 — 1,721 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,721 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,722 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,720 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,721 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,717 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,718 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,716 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,718 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,717 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,718 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,716 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,715 subscribers6 August 202614 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,714–1,723 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 12:211,715-1
10 Sept 2026, 17:381,716-2
5 Sept 2026, 20:161,718+1
1 Sept 2026, 10:571,717-1
29 Aug 2026, 10:571,718+2
26 Aug 2026, 18:441,716-2
23 Aug 2026, 15:251,718+1
20 Aug 2026, 00:261,717-4
17 Aug 2026, 09:471,721+1
13 Aug 2026, 08:581,720-2
6 Aug 2026, 21:241,722+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:051,721no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:291,721first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

102 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3534.3%
3332.4%
👍1817.6%
🙈76.86%
👏43.92%
🤔32.94%
🏆10.98%
👎10.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC148 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Студия из Лидса WPA-pinfold создала запоминающийся облик для местного крафтововго пива.

🔥53👍2🙈1

4 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC223 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот любят американцы все эти перчики. От острых до смертельных. И потому красиво оформляют. Вот как, например, калифорнийская студия ZIMO оформила острые соусы.

🔥63👍2👏2🙈1

30 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC252 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дизайн упаковки коктейлей от австралийской студии ZIG Design. Хорошая может линейка получится - вся колода.

🔥64👍1🤔1🙈1

28 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC252 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Какая то наивная и беззащитная перед критикой работа немецкой студии Milk для упаковки муки. Но критиковать почему то не хочется.

👍74🔥2🤔1

26 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC254 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Упаковка салфеток от чешской студии grain of design. Трогательно...

9🔥3👏2🙈1

24 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC284 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Много солнца, цветов и почти рандомная игра переднего и заднего фонов в упаковке ликера от испанской Yesbrand

6🔥4👍2🙈1

23 Jul 2026, 18:15 UTC327 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Студия из Дубая Golparvar создала нескучные упаковки для витаминов, что встречается нечасто.

👍4🔥31🤔1

20 Jul 2026, 18:20 UTC301 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Жив FALLOUT!" подумал я, глядя на ретро-лаконичные и при этом жизнерадосные упаковки вейпов от лондонской студии Design happy.

🔥63🙈2🏆1👎1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @brandfriend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ParaGraph
@paradigm_graphics · 34,990
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Brandfriend” (@brandfriend), 1,715 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brandfriend.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.