Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Браун разберётся

Channel

Браун разберётся

@braunoff

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

256subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001313773758
TypeChannel
Username@braunoff
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/braunoff

Growth

256263259.57 August 2026 — 263 subscribers8 August 2026 — 263 subscribers21 August 2026 — 261 subscribers29 August 2026 — 260 subscribers8 September 2026 — 256 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 255–264 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 08:54256-4
29 Aug 2026, 04:58260-1
21 Aug 2026, 06:28261-2
8 Aug 2026, 09:03263no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:01263first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5345994257742200478423.5%
custom 5235639045916207782317.6%
custom 5467658895847608185317.6%
custom 5235910852921536776211.8%
custom 5454024578001025865211.8%
custom 5976305408787091589211.8%
custom 533460052125471165015.88%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 04:38 UTC84 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Странно, почему Курбатова нет на обложке

3 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC92 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мне так нравится, когда подобные эксперты рассуждают на тему блокировок или отечественных сервисов, используя местоимение «наш» Прикольно утверждать, что-то о «нашем» ведя либшизойдные выпуски откуда-то из-за границы. Как же им с кайфом тявкается Безотносительно самого видео, ВК, конечно, треш, но давайте мы сами как-то разберёмся без «вашей» помощи

2 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC100 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Напоминаю. ТГ до сих пор считает эти каналы похожими на мой

27 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC148 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Когда спросил руководителя проекта, как будем выбираться из сложившейся ситуации

26 Jul 2026, 05:38 UTC147 viewsread 8 August 2026

Почти победил Ютуб с рекомендациями видео с регистраторов, полицейских задержаний и прочей Karens Karma хуйни под этот трек Его борьба

24 Jul 2026, 04:47 UTC142 viewsread 8 August 2026

Всё было прекрасно на музыкальных сервисах, пока не появился ебучий фонк

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @braunoff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Браун разберётся” (@braunoff), 256 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/braunoff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.